Porter Stoutheart
Seen Stamkos?
- Jun 14, 2017
- 16,062
- 12,512
Maybe I just never really bought into "the hype" like other people did, I don't even really remember, but for some reason every time people talk about "the hype" as a factor with Tolvanen, it just rubs me the wrong way. Because I never really experienced that the same way others seem to have? Or anyway, "the hype" seems like a total red herring issue to me, 4 years later. We've had ample time to see Tolvanen progress and evolve as a hockey player, and stopped caring about his performance as a teenager several years ago. Or we should have anyway.I have to check my own emotions on this move. I think realistically it doesn't really move the needle for us either way in a vacuum. I think the hype and hope I had for his development was higher than most just based on how he showed so early, so that brings my frustrations to the fore front. I'll say I have learned my lesson on buying into the hype. There are :insert team color: tinted glasses and then there's a huge leap up to get to the level of bias you see in the European market for "their" player". Tolvy was a prime example of this, but I suspect it happens on all the different national perspectives. Maybe Americans are the exception as they don't seem to care enough to hype their hockey guys I guess or maybe I have missed those threads.
He's an ok player, it's not going to sink the franchise to lose him anymore than it did to lose Jarnkrok or dozens of other middle lineup players along the way. Not in isolation. It's more how it is just another example of an ongoing issue that touches on other players and the direction our team seems to be taking with its young players lately. He is just one more example in what is becoming a pattern that I don't like.