Power vs L. Hughes vs Edvinsson vs Clarke

Who would you take 1st in a redraft?

  • Owen Power

    Votes: 20 13.1%
  • Luke Hughes

    Votes: 92 60.1%
  • Simon Edvinsson

    Votes: 32 20.9%
  • Brandt Clarke

    Votes: 9 5.9%

  • Total voters
    153

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
4,107
3,743
Only advanced stats matter. Nothing else.

These teams will be playing in future playoff games and if this guy does this:

View attachment 944190

Imagine what edvinsson is gonna do.
No Mr Seider post is not food
Screenshot 2024-12-14 at 12.05.18 AM.png




Might be time to hit the weight room Mo if you're getting sent flying by Jack Hughes reverse hits. Nice sell job tho.
 

Pavels Dog

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
20,978
16,863
Sweden
Not the claim I am making at all.

I am pointing out the stupidity of your claim about help when I know that you think Edvinsson has a SIGNIFICANTLY better partner, and that if I actually went and asked you about the forwards, you would favour a significant number of detroits.

I can almost guarantee that you think Seider is significantly better than pesce, and that Detroits 1st and 4th lines have better players than NJD. (I'm less confident about line 3, but I still expect that you think it's the case).

Answer the question.

Pesce vs Seider

and each of the lines.

And yet you are claiming that there is a MASSIVE gap in help around him favouring Luke.

And if we compared Nico to Larkin you'd say the same thing and so on and so on and so on.

It's a weak argument by fans of bad teams to make themselves feel better. Blame it on having "less help" and then apply that to every single player on your team.
Everything in this post is completely made up in your own head.

And yet you are claiming that there is a MASSIVE gap in help around him favouring Luke.
Where was this claim for example?

Luke leads the entire league in xG% among defenseman (>200 mins) at 60.1%. Playing on a good team obviously helps, but he takes that team from good to great when he's on the ice. That's not an easy thing to do.
It may not be easy, but it's not like he's breaking the mold on the Devils. Every D but Hamilton is above 55% and Kovacevic for example is right up there with Hughes. Among forwards Meier, Hischier, Hughes, Tatar etc. are all going in the 58-61% range and no regulars are below 50%.

Meanwhile Edvinsson is the only d-man above 50% on Detroit. His relative xGF% is more than twice as good as Hughes. It's like Edvinsson is able to float above the massive gravity that is dragging down nearly the entirety of the rest of the roster. To me, that's more impressive than Hughes numbers.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

will post scouting reports for food**
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,606
34,683
**or compliments
It may not be easy, but it's not like he's breaking the mold on the Devils. Every D but Hamilton is above 55% and Kovacevic for example is right up there with Hughes. Among forwards Meier, Hischier, Hughes, Tatar etc. are all going in the 58-61% range and no regulars are below 50%.

Meanwhile Edvinsson is the only d-man above 50% on Detroit. His relative xGF% is more than twice as good as Hughes.
It's a lot easier to have an inflated rel xG% on a terrible team. it's still impressive, but Hughes would have to be at ~65% to get the same rel xG%. It's just not realistic.
It's like Edvinsson is able to float above the massive gravity that is dragging down nearly the entirety of the rest of the roster. To me, that's more impressive than Hughes numbers.
Debrincat and Kasper are also floating above that gravity. Larkin, Raymond, Berggren, and Maatta are all in 48-51% range as well.
 

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
4,107
3,743
Everything in this post is completely made up in your own head.


Where was this claim for example?


It may not be easy, but it's not like he's breaking the mold on the Devils. Every D but Hamilton is above 55% and Kovacevic for example is right up there with Hughes. Among forwards Meier, Hischier, Hughes, Tatar etc. are all going in the 58-61% range and no regulars are below 50%.

Meanwhile Edvinsson is the only d-man above 50% on Detroit. His relative xGF% is more than twice as good as Hughes. It's like Edvinsson is able to float above the massive gravity that is dragging down nearly the entirety of the rest of the roster. To me, that's more impressive than Hughes numbers.
Yes, Kovy Siegs and Dillon-Hamilton are also quality defensive pairs. 3 excellent pairings.

Seider-Edvinsson being better than Chiarot, Holl, Petry, and Gustafsson isn't some crazy accomplishment.

Meanwhile after today Luke Hughes will likely move to 1st in the league in xGoals% (minimum 200 minutes) at around 61.5%.

At a certain point when does it stop. What more could luke possibly do beyond 1st in the f***ing league.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WhiskeyYerTheDevils

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
4,107
3,743
It's a lot easier to have an inflated rel xG% on a terrible team. it's still impressive, but Hughes would have to be at ~65% to get the same rel xG%. It's just not realistic.

Debrincat and Kasper are also floating above that gravity. Larkin, Raymond, Berggren, and Maatta are all in 48-51% range as well.

Yup. If the claim is

"the gap between Edvinsson-Seider and Petry,Holl,Chiarot, Gustafsson is bigger than the gap between Luke-Pesce and Dougie-Dillon and Siegs-Kovy"

That would be true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiskeyYerTheDevils

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad