Player Discussion: Brock Boeser | III | Our Boy in College

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

The Iron Goalie

Formally 'OEL for Norris'
Feb 8, 2012
3,538
3,127
Langley, BC
Pretty much what I expected.

Boeser himself probably surprised himself with how good he was and can see himself in the NHL sooner then later. Wouldn't surprise me one bit if he is in the NHL next season.

I could see a 50/50 NHL/AHL split. But you never know with this management.

A start in the AHL is probably best, unless he kills it at main camp, or even makes main camp. Let him play against men for 15-20 games then decide if his play deserves a call up. No need to rush this guy.
 

Rex Banner

Custom User Title
Aug 22, 2013
1,914
3
I'd almost prefer him to do a second year at UND. Clearly a good development environment.
 

Karl Hungus

Registered User
Oct 6, 2007
2,470
0
I like the idea of Boeser going to the AHL. The biggest thing he needs to work on is quickness and explosiveness. I think the AHL will be a better place to do that than UND.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,231
89,969
Vancouver, BC
He has absolutely destroyed college hockey. No reason for him to stay another year. Get him signed and move him up levels.

I don't like rushing guys but when they've shredded their current level like this you don't want them to stagnate.
 

tantalum

Hope for the best. Expect the worst
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2002
25,372
14,496
Missouri
The Canucks do have a choice. He can't play pro hockey in north america until the team that drafted him and owns his rights offers him a pro contract.

I guess he could go play in Europe.

As I said it's not really up to the canucks. He can indeed go play pro hockey. In leagues comparable and better than the AHL even. It would also be remarkably stupid for the canucks to try to say no. Pretty much guarantees a trade demand.
 

Love

Registered User
Feb 29, 2012
15,159
12,591
I also think Utica would be ideal for Boeser.

How much fun would it be to watch Boeser, McCann, Demko, and Subban all in Utica next season? Would probably be the most exciting young team we've had in the AHL in a long time. And I could easily see McCann, Boeser, and Subban getting called up to the big club throughout the season as well depending on how they play and injuries.
 

GetFocht

Indestructible
Jun 11, 2013
9,077
4,373
I can't get enough of this list:

Points per game for draft+1 since 2005:

Kyle Connor - 1.71
Jaden Schwartz - 1.57
Brock Boeser - 1.36
Jonathan Toews - 1.35
Dylan Larkin - 1.34
Colin Wilson - 1.28
James van Riemsdyk - 1.10
Max Pacioretty - 1.05 0.41
TJ Oshie - 1.02
Kyle Okposo - 1.00
 

kanuck87

Registered User
Oct 12, 2008
7,172
1,468
I can't get enough of this list:

Points per game for draft+1 since 2005:

Kyle Connor - 1.71
Jaden Schwartz - 1.57
Brock Boeser - 1.36
Jonathan Toews - 1.35
Dylan Larkin - 1.34
Colin Wilson - 1.28
James van Riemsdyk - 1.10
Max Pacioretty - 1.05 0.41
TJ Oshie - 1.02
Kyle Okposo - 1.00

Holy **** this is an impressive list of NHLers. I would literally take any one of those guys on this list as potential outcomes for Boeser. Wilson might be the exception, but even he's been a decent NHLer thus far
 

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
39,839
25,442
Vancouver, BC
I can't get enough of this list:

Points per game for draft+1 since 2005:

Kyle Connor - 1.71
Jaden Schwartz - 1.57
Brock Boeser - 1.36
Jonathan Toews - 1.35
Dylan Larkin - 1.34
Colin Wilson - 1.28
James van Riemsdyk - 1.10
Max Pacioretty - 1.05 0.41
TJ Oshie - 1.02
Kyle Okposo - 1.00

I hadn't seen that before!
That is an amazing list!
 

GetFocht

Indestructible
Jun 11, 2013
9,077
4,373
I hadn't seen that before!
That is an amazing list!

If you want to know something eve more impressive is that Boeser's goals per game is higher than any of those except for Kyle Connor.

Also the NCHC is the toughest division of NCAA which makes Boeser's season even more amazing.
 

DL44

Status quo
Sep 26, 2006
17,946
3,872
Location: Location:
I can't get enough of this list:

Points per game for draft+1 since 2005:

Kyle Connor - 1.71
Jaden Schwartz - 1.57
Brock Boeser - 1.36
Jonathan Toews - 1.35
Dylan Larkin - 1.34
Colin Wilson - 1.28
James van Riemsdyk - 1.10
Max Pacioretty - 1.05 0.41
TJ Oshie - 1.02
Kyle Okposo - 1.00

If that's an all inclusive list, that is exciting.
 

ahmon

Registered User
Jun 25, 2002
10,417
1,994
Visit site
Kyle Connor has much better speed and quickness than Boeser.

Boeser has the better shot and finish.
 

Nucker101

Foundational Poster
Apr 2, 2013
21,813
17,795
Kyle Connor was 6th overall for me...I still have no idea how he fell so far.

I forgot exactly where I had him on my list, but definitely top 10. He impressed the hell outta me the few times I saw him play.

No idea why so many teams passed him up, Boston 3x especially. Him falling was more surprising than Barzal for me. Saw that Larkin-like upside.

I liked Boeser too, but had him in the late teens. Didn't expect him to progress like this.
 

ProstheticConscience

Check dein Limit
Apr 30, 2010
18,459
10,108
Canuck Nation
He has absolutely destroyed college hockey. No reason for him to stay another year. Get him signed and move him up levels.

I don't like rushing guys but when they've shredded their current level like this you don't want them to stagnate.

Wasn't he going to stay to work on his degree in whatever? IIRC somewhere I read he'd be staying at uni for at least another year. Can't remember where.

Although damn, I'm hoping to see him at training camp in Sept.

Very, very impressed with his progression.
 

timw33

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 18, 2007
26,027
20,581
Victoria
Wasn't he going to stay to work on his degree in whatever? IIRC somewhere I read he'd be staying at uni for at least another year. Can't remember where.

Although damn, I'm hoping to see him at training camp in Sept.

Very, very impressed with his progression.

Signing bonus more than pays for him to go back to college at any time in the future if it doesn't work out.
 

CanaFan

Registered User
Feb 19, 2010
19,887
5,849
BC
I forgot exactly where I had him on my list, but definitely top 10. He impressed the hell outta me the few times I saw him play.

No idea why so many teams passed him up, Boston 3x especially. Him falling was more surprising than Barzal for me. Saw that Larkin-like upside.

I liked Boeser too, but had him in the late teens. Didn't expect him to progress like this.

Ditto. I had him down as our pick in our mock but never expected he'd have a Fr year like this. TBH I'd have been stoked with anything around 18-20 goals and a PPG rate overall. Outside of Connor (who I had going 6-9), he's the biggest NCAA debut in years.
 

ahmon

Registered User
Jun 25, 2002
10,417
1,994
Visit site
had him in the top 15 comfortably. said on draft day Boeser will be top 10 in future re-drafts.

Shot is too good, and has a rounded game.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad