It doesn't matter.. did you see the cup run? He was unconscious... he has a cup hank doesn't.. hank isn't the better goalie
Crawford is the most underrated goalie in the league the guy is good...and both of them just got on another level a level hank hasn't been at
I'm officially a Hawks fan. I can't imagine how nice it must be to have management that can add guys like Sharp and Hossa to a core like Toews, Kane, Keith, Seabrook and then keep drafting guys like Saad.
So the Rangers haven't scored in 2 games, have had maybe 4 quality chances yet it's lundqvists fault for not stopping breakaways according to some of you. Yet Richter keeps on being brought up, like he would have made a difference. Lundqvist has yet to play on a team close to that 94 team.
No, but St. Louis is contributing in all facets of the game.
We also had 4 pipeshots right?
Team looked snakebit tonight...Really wanted the W tonight
Yes, plus the PP would certainly be better.
He is the best REGULAR SEASON goalie in this franchise's history. I'll never forget those magical post season runs Mike Richter gave us. Lundqvist? He can't even string together 2 good playoff games in a row, let alone win a cup.
Let me ask you a question...what has Lundqvist done for us? A bunch of 2nd round exits? I think we could have done that with a mediocre goaltender, don't you?
He gets paid BIG BUCKS to win games like tonight and he failed...AGAIN. Forgive me for not being in awe of him the way you are.
He is the best REGULAR SEASON goalie in this franchise's history. I'll never forget those magical post season runs Mike Richter gave us. Lundqvist? He can't even string together 2 good playoff games in a row, let alone win a cup.
Let me ask you a question...what has Lundqvist done for us? A bunch of 2nd round exits? I think we could have done that with a mediocre goaltender, don't you?
He gets paid BIG BUCKS to win games like tonight and he failed...AGAIN. Forgive me for not being in awe of him the way you are.
All these arguments about Lundqvist are detracting from the real issues of PP ineptness and inability to finish. Maybe it's a deflection tactic orchestrated by Sather![]()
Fleury has faced twice as many shots, and guess what? HE HAS STOPPED EVERY SINGLE ONE until his team scored.
No, you can win 1-0 in overtime.
Even still, Lundqvist hasn't been able to shut anyone out yet. Yes, sometimes you need to rely on the goalie to keep the game 0-0 and hope that the team can luckily pot one. Game 7 was the only playoff game so far out of 10 where the Rangers went into the 3rd period with zero goals against.
Of course there would be a lot less Lundqvist talk if they PP was actually even decent, if Nash, St. Louis, Stepan, etc. would wake up and all that. I feel like it's the same story year after year with the Rangers. The forwards completely disappear come playoff time and then everyone bashes Lundqvist. Either way, Lundqvist isn't blameless like many people want to say, but he also isn't the main culprit either.
Some guy said... and i thought it was funny...Stepan before faceoffs telling all the guys what to do...he never wins a faceoff...ohhhh i was laughing hard at that...LGR!!!!!!!!!
The goal against Crosby was not a breakaway. He was at an angle and Lundqvist gave up a bad goal. He needed to make that save. He failed...again.
If you have to do that, you probably aren't winning anything.
You can't rely on your goalie to get a shut out every game. And that's what's he would've had to do the past 2 games seeing as the Rangers have been shut out in both of them.
Start showing it on the ice, Hank. That Crosby goal was junk tonight. He has no angle and you let him beat you 5 hole (the only place he had to shoot). Then you came up small on the JOKE-inin breakaway and failed to keep us in the game. Bad game, dude.
If you have to do that, you probably aren't winning anything.
You can't rely on your goalie to get a shut out every game. And that's what's he would've had to do the past 2 games seeing as the Rangers have been shut out in both of them.
What revision? Winning a cup?
The 1997 Rangers were garbage and Richter carried them to the ECF that year. In 1994 he went the distance and won the cup for us. Lundqvist has ONE ecf under his belt that he BARELY achived by the team winning 2 game 7 series in 2012.
I don't see a comparsion between him and Richter in the playoffs. Richter will always be regarded higher than Lundqvist, that's a fact.