Archijerej
Registered User
I don't doubt that. Narrow-minded fanatics have pretty predictable patterns of behavior.And I will be here to laugh at their idiocy each and every time.
I don't doubt that. Narrow-minded fanatics have pretty predictable patterns of behavior.And I will be here to laugh at their idiocy each and every time.
I think unfortunately you're going to have to come to terms with the fact that our players' spouses are not always going to share your political opinions.
It's bizarre, I know.
Like freely setting up a tent in the middle of a city street to complain about how unfree you are?I don't doubt that. Narrow-minded fanatics have pretty predictable patterns of behavior.
Agreed. I don't follow defensemen much unless they appear capable of 50+ points so I knew nothing about Matheson. I would have cheered if Ty Smith was the d acquired and I would likely have been wrong because according to Devils fans he can't skate but Matheson is apparently a very good skater.
Woke and elite in one post!Ah yes, the liberal elite. They are all woke, progressive, and understanding, but only if you agree blindly with their views.
He might, actually, like many other habs. Most of the team would be OK if they had a few play drivers up front and a few guys to carry the puck on D. Problem isn’t the middle guys it’s the complete lack of top guys.A lot of players show potential but very few ever fulfill said potential and are able to stay in the league. The obsession that many HF posters have with potential like life is a video game is laughable. Poehling could not grab a spot on a terrible and depleted Montréal Canadiens team but he will somehow make it on a much stronger Penguins team.
What’s with the superimposed triangles above his dome — is that some kind of alien symbol or portal?![]()
Matheson first this team
Transition game and good skater
He didn't have a toxic attitude he just played bad because he wasn't focused mentally.I can tolerate bad play but i will never tolerate a toxic attitude at the workplace.
Staal was also a washed up rental unlike Petry who was supposed to be the #1 defenceman.
And yet, that Diaz trade was instrumental in … landing Dach:I mean it is par for the course. Habs fans love their 4th liners and 6th defencemen. I will never not remember the outrage on this board when they traded Diaz...like we gave up on Bobby Orr or something. He was back in Europe 2 years later lol.
I think a 4th is a good return for Poehling. But I see him a bit differently than you. I see him as a guy who might be a 4th liner in the NHL but might not be good enough to regularly play in the NHL. I do think if he can become a fixture on a 4th line he could maybe possibly play up in the lineup. I also think that he was probably not going to make the Habs this coming season out of training camp. Watching Poehling last year, I thought he might be traded soon. It seems the Habs like Pezzetta and Pitlick more, and I sort of don't blame them.He's a NHL 4th line forward and if he has that modest growth, he might turn into a decent bottom 6F. That's worth more than a 4th but you can't force his value onto someone else.
Pens were trading someone who looks like Petry did at the age of 28 so there is a 6 year age gap. They requested Poehling in the deal and I'm sure Hughes tried to get something better than a 4th added on but they didn't budge. With the cap space in the NHL, we had little leverage to hold out for a better deal.
He has his qualities, but Poehling didn't earn his way to play on the top line.
Geez I was trying to cut her some slack, the lack of travel must have been tough, but yikes. It's not politics, unfortunately, it's funded intimidation and the people funding it are really not nice people.Before last season nobody knew his wife was a conspiracy nut.
![]()
The more I look into Matheson, the more I'm content. I was looking for cap relief but Hughes was looking for a NHL body with experience.
Matheson is basically where Petry was at age 28. Similar body size, skating, and mobility. Hughes don't want to expose the young D so you can't fault him for this move too much.
Like freely setting up a tent in the middle of a city street to complain about how unfree you are?
Always such homerism when a player isn’t ours anymore. HuGo are not perfect. They will make mistakes. This is one of them.Crosby is only under contract for 3 more years. It's questionable whether Poehling can net 30 goals total in that time.
And we want him playing well why? To trade him I guess but nothing else. We have to lose as many games as possible.Hughes seems to believe in Matheson as a quality asset. We'll see how it goes.
His 4.85 cap hit and age should be easier to move if he plays well.
So it all comes down to how well he plays.
You need NHL players to play on that D. The youngsters are not ready at all.Always such homerism when a player isn’t ours anymore. HuGo are not perfect. They will make mistakes. This is one of them.
And we want him playing well why? To trade him I guess but nothing else. We have to lose as many games as possible.
Petry at 50% retention would have returned strong assets for the future.
Then you bring in a cheap veteran. You don’t make this move.You need NHL players to play on that D. The youngsters are not ready at all.
I get it. You like Poehling, while I thought he was a disappointment and likely to be on waivers at the start of the season. Could call both - - or neither - - views homerism.Always such homerism when a player isn’t ours anymore. HuGo are not perfect. They will make mistakes. This is one of them.
Always such homerism when a player isn’t ours anymore. HuGo are not perfect. They will make mistakes. This is one of them.
And we want him playing well why? To trade him I guess but nothing else. We have to lose as many games as possible.
Petry at 50% retention would have returned strong assets for the future.
Well said @Pompeius MagnusPoehling got good enough to be a serviceable depth guy on an NHL team, but it does look like he's plateaued a bit. In the end, he was getting buried in the chart and was pretty expandable, even more so with Dach coming in. He didn't get to the 100 NHL games mark though so it's still early for him, there's a possibility he could still get better. It's a risk, but IMO it's not a big one. At least we got something for him when he still had some value.
I think the same can be said who funds CBC, and other big networks. He who owns the narrative, owns the minds to an extent. To bring this back to hockey, look at what the media did to Shane Wright- over 80% of this board was hook, line, and sinker into drafting this guy.. Buddy went 4th.Geez I was trying to cut her some slack, the lack of travel must have been tough, but yikes. It's not politics, unfortunately, it's funded intimidation and the people funding it are really not nice people.
The media is just going by what scouts are saying. Oddly enough most scouts had Wright 2nd even if they ranked Slav 1st. And he still went 4th.I think the same can be said who funds CBC, and other big networks. He who owns the narrative, owns the minds to an extent. To bring this back to hockey, look at what the media did to Shane Wright- over 80% of this board was hook, line, and sinker into drafting this guy.. Buddy went 4th.