Speculation: Pierre-Luc Dubois Mega thread. (LAK frontrunner, but Montreal has circled back)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,869
31,241
Shift Perfetti to C and flip Niederreiter over to LW. Put Vilardi in 2RW slot

Conner - ??? - Ehlers
Niederreiter - Perfetti - Vilardi
Iaffallo - Lowry - Stenlund
Barron - Gus - Apples

That bottom 9 is not bad but that hole between Connor and Ehlers is like a Florida sinkhole.
 

Mersss

Registered User
Jul 12, 2014
5,001
2,201
We see that happen every year, fans want to win/max and hope for the best & cheapest outcome and rarely does it ever happen. PLD is a good 2C and will sign I'm guessing about 8.25 x 8 which is basically the same deal as Suzuki got taken into consideration the extra UFA year. Both guys have virtually the same stats as each other, one played with better players and the other one was given more TOI/opportunities bc lack of depth on the team, they have basically the same value overall.
You mean same stats while one of them played with shitty ish player for most of his career while the other player with the likes of Blake Wheeler. kyle Connor, Scheiffle, Ehelers... Even if Suzuki player 25min a night... When the best player you play with is Mike Hoffman or any Habs winger you won't be PPG.

FYI, Suzuki was PPG right to until Caufield season was over. Pretty sure guu van reach 70-80 points if they can stay healthy together.
 

Goal Caufield50

Registered User
Jul 13, 2007
932
326
If LAK can sign PLD to Fiala money then they have gotten themselves a pretty good deal. If Clarke and Byfield fulfill their potential they will have a vg team. Talented Vets(Doughty, Kopi, Arvidsson, Danault), players in their prime(Fiala, Kempe, PLD), young players(Clarke, Byfield, Kaliyev, Anderson).

Goalie might be a problem, though.
It is the problem
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

Heldig

Registered User
Apr 12, 2002
17,635
11,320
BC
They would be stupid when they have a burgeoning 2C in Dach that is on a team friendly contract. Trading significant assets and then overpaying (reportedly 9M AAV longterm) for PLD is the highest level of stupidity.
My point is Montreal is a bad team. Balking at trading for a very good player because you have a guy that may be as good in the future seems like a way to continue to be bad. And make no mistake, PLD would make your team better and be one of your best players.

Reported trade is not paying significant assets.

Might be the report of $9 million was only a hometown tax.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass

RandomTask26

Registered User
Jan 6, 2020
851
995
Dang, really wanted him in Montreal but the team just doesn’t have the assets Winnipeg would want (since they don’t want a full rebuild). Trading Dach+ for him just doesn’t make sense and nothing else likely is attractive to the Jets

Too bad
 
  • Like
Reactions: MardyBum

Sugi21

Registered User
Dec 7, 2016
3,126
2,806
In terms of trade compensation, it’s looking slightly :sarcasm: better than Dvorak, Kidney and Florida’s 1st rounder.
Depends what PLD signs for? if it’s for the reported $9 million per year then yikes
 

Junohockeyfan

Registered User
Dec 16, 2018
15,088
12,823
My point is Montreal is a bad team. Balking at trading for a very good player because you have a guy that may be as good in the future seems like a way to continue to be bad. And make no mistake, PLD would make your team better and be one of your best players.

Reported trade is not paying significant assets.

Might be the report of $9 million was only a hometown tax.
We are balking at trading for a player and giving up significant assets when we might not even need him given Dach's development. Plus we may still draft a C at 5OA. Overpaying PLD on top of it is the height of stupidity.

Hughes made the right decision here. Its not his problem that PLD wants to be a Hab. He's not obligated to lose significant assets and overpay because PLD wants to play in Montreal.

People are losing sight of the fact that Montreal made its decision on the 2C position last year at the draft when they traded for Dach. Dach has only affirmed this move by Hughes. And Dach signed a team friendly contract. Habs are in player development mode and are accumulating picks / prospects. Not throwing them away.

PLD is a distraction and a potential disaster if he was in Montreal.
 

Mersss

Registered User
Jul 12, 2014
5,001
2,201
My point is Montreal is a bad team. Balking at trading for a very good player because you have a guy that may be as good in the future seems like a way to continue to be bad. And make no mistake, PLD would make your team better and be one of your best players.

Reported trade is not paying significant assets.

Might be the report of $9 million was only a hometown tax.
The team is rebuilding and anking for another 2 year minimum. We don't want to get better. Being PLD here means Habs will be contending for playoff next year, likelly miss and draft around 10-20 for the next 15years again. Why exactly?

If the price paid is more than a late 1st + B prospect + Cap dump, I am glad Hughes passed, and kept course into building a contender that will last for 10-15 years by adding young top talent to the team.
 

Bond

Registered User
May 10, 2012
4,394
3,322
Pat Brisson is best bros with Luc Robitaille. The contract won't be an issue. The Kings know the asking price.
I always thought it was weird that agents became GMs but it totally makes sense. Brisson is brokering PLD, Hanifin, and Toffoli. That's some solid experience.
 

Frank Drebin

Likes are suspended, sorry for inconvenience
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,503
23,137
Edmonton
NO! The team needs a starting goalie, bigger defense, and an entire 4th line that is over 5-10" .
This acquisition feels a for similar to when Toronto added Tavares.
I mean you have to get a guy like that when he's available, but you don't really need him
 
  • Like
Reactions: kingsfan28

GirardSpinorama

Registered User
Aug 20, 2004
21,788
10,782
We are balking at trading for a player and giving up significant assets when we might not even need him given Dach's development. Plus we may still draft a C at 5OA. Overpaying PLD on top of it is the height of stupidity.

Hughes made the right decision here. Its not his problem that PLD wants to be a Hab. He's not obligated to lose significant assets and overpay because PLD wants to play in Montreal.

People are losing sight of the fact that Montreal made its decision on the 2C position last year at the draft when they traded for Dach. Dach has only affirmed this move by Hughes.

PLD is a distraction and a potential disaster if he was in Montreal.

Ya he's certainly a 8000 post distraction for Montreal fans. Better for this chapter to be over. The only winners are the bad journalist that got fans hopes up.
 

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
58,869
31,241
scheifele. dont believe the nonsense that he is going anywhere. helle will bring back a 2nd line center

And Scheifele + the Helle return C will be completely wasted with (fill in with any substandard backup you like) as the starter in net.
 

Junohockeyfan

Registered User
Dec 16, 2018
15,088
12,823
Ya he's certainly a 8000 post distraction for Montreal fans. Better for this chapter to be over. The only winners are the bad journalist that got fans hopes up.
haha, its so easy for journalists to bait Habs fans. Just put "PLD", "Montreal" and "likely" in a sentence and you get 8000 hits / hour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GirardSpinorama

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,695
7,955
As per the Johansen trade. Cap space is also very important. Not claiming PLD is the next Johansen but he will get paid a significant salary and you have to give up assets also.
For the Kings, it might help them beyond Kopitar but there is a risk that PLD dissapoint and now you are stuck with him. A bit like Calgary with Huberdeau.
Huberdeau and Johansen are 30. Dubois just turned 25 a couple days ago. Not even remotely comparable contracts/situations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass

Bond

Registered User
May 10, 2012
4,394
3,322
Not at all. Just pointing out that in the majority of cases it's not the cityvof Winnipeg .It's issues that management and ownership should have fixed years ago and other reasons. It's not that hard to understand my post.
Yeah, I think Calgary, Edmonton, and Winnipeg have to have competitive teams to keep and attract talent. Once they start to slide then the city isn't going to hold most young millionaires
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad