Speculation: Pierre-Luc Dubois Mega thread. (LAK frontrunner, but Montreal has circled back)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Guffman

Registered User
Apr 7, 2016
6,357
8,534
Personally, I think PLD is mistake for Kings. He is never going to be more then 60-70 pt C who isn't all that great at faceoffs or any other facet of game

Giving up Vilardi is a mistake IMO

He is really coming together as player and is only 23

I think Vilardi could be a PPG 1st line winger for years to come who could be 35-40 goal scorer

Y’know, Dubois is just one year older than Vilardi. Dubois has already established himself, while Vilardi has not.

As a Jets fan, I would have much preferred to have extended Dubois in Winnipeg if that was an option rather than trade him for Vilardi.
 

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
8,169
14,590
Kansas City, MO
PLD is objectively a better talent than Vilardi at a position that is valued higher. But you gotta pay him.

I think this could be a good trade for both teams although the Jets look really think at center now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

Junohockeyfan

Registered User
Dec 16, 2018
15,088
12,823
I will say this though. There are indeed Habs fans who will be upset. The same fans who believe that having French Canadian star players are more important than a team that can compete for a cup. The type of fan that gives higher value and esteem to a player who has a french name over a better player with an english name.

Yes, make no mistake, there will be very disappointed Habs fans. And this Habs fan sends my sincere sympathies to you weak ass putzes! ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

howkie

Registered User
Dec 13, 2014
4,291
2,618
a third overall that never amounted to much and signed an offer sheet...that was not a trade. You could say that all teams that lose free agents didn't do very well with the ROI.
So it is oki to smack Jets but we cant do the same to Montreal because they made a worse draftpick? Both are equal bad, but looks like Jets can salvage some value but Montreal just wasted a third overall on nothing..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snowman

Guffman

Registered User
Apr 7, 2016
6,357
8,534
I’m one of the most perceivably on board with his joining the habs and still I would not give anything but salary and whoever’r’s spot he’d be taking in return.

Well, he would have taken Dach’s spot as 2C lol but who are we kidding? Dach will likely be a winger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BKarchitect

Junohockeyfan

Registered User
Dec 16, 2018
15,088
12,823
Well, he would have taken Dach’s spot as 2C lol but who are we kidding? Dach will likely be a winger.
Then why did Dach finish the season as the Habs 2C and was our best play driver after Suzuki? Your hate for Habs trollish offers shouldn't cloud your better judgement on players that you really don' know much about. lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

Bringer of Jollity

Registered User
Oct 20, 2011
13,700
9,064
Fontana, CA
1687707810203.png


1687707845952.png
 

Go Wings

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
6,337
4,429
Chatham, ON
This has all the makings of an awful trade for LA. Giving up a young Vilardi and less young Iafallo for PLD. A guy who is on his 3rd team at 25 and going to be signed to much more money they he is currently worth.
It might work out in the end for them but it has big potential to blow up in LA's face.
 

Rob Sense

Registered User
Apr 26, 2015
2,550
3,189
At Dach's age PLD had scored 32 more goals and 61 more points in about the same number of games and he's only gotten better since. In Dach's "breakout" season he was barely more productive than PLD's rookie year despite playing in a much higher scoring league. Chances Dach will ever be as good as PLD is right now have to be less than 5%, maybe lower.
right and he is looking for a European Beer League backup plan as we speak!
 

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
190,336
23,269
Chicagoland
Last i checked, Habs traded for a big, young C in Dach who made great strides last season and is set to be the Habs 2C of the future. They have the answers from within. And they can double down at 5 if Smith is available (or even Leonard who can play C).

The point is - PLD at 9M AAV as reported would have been a huge mistake. And giving up a potential C in Dach who is on a team friendly contract in the process would have exacerbated this mistake.

The question now is - what are the Jets going to do for a 2C? Perfetti ain't it and apparently Viliardi is not a C.

Your not a viable solution at C if your 38.3% at faceoffs. Dach has shown no improvement at dot

Dach has major issues as a NHL C at this point he needs to fix going forward if that is plan from Habs

Its looking more and more like Dach will be winger in NHL not C
 

Barriwhite

Don’t be shocked by the tone of my voice
Nov 8, 2005
1,972
367
Montreal
I will say this though. There are indeed Habs fans who will be upset. The same fans who believe that having French Canadian star players are more important than a team that can compete for a cup. The type of fan that gives higher value and esteem to a player who has a french name over a better player with an english name.

Yes, make no mistake, there will be very disappointed Habs fans. And this Habs fan sends my sincere sympathies to you weak ass putzes! ;)
Come on now… name 1 poster that does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naslundforever

Junohockeyfan

Registered User
Dec 16, 2018
15,088
12,823
I feel Blake tends to overpay for stuff like this. Trading Vilardi is going to haunt us.
I really think the Jets win this trade if Vilardi ++ is the return. But it depends solely on what the LA Kings sign PLD to. If its over 8M AAV, then Jets win. If its under 8M then its a good hockey trade for both.

Vilardi + Iafallo + Turcotte + 2nd?
That's a win for the Jets IMO. Unless the Kings sign PLD to 8 x 6M.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlappyGiraffe

Guffman

Registered User
Apr 7, 2016
6,357
8,534
Last i checked, Habs traded for a big, young C in Dach who made great strides last season and is set to be the Habs 2C of the future. They have the answers from within. And they can double down at 5 if Smith is available (or even Leonard who can play C).

The point is - PLD at 9M AAV as reported would have been a huge mistake. And giving up a potential C in Dach who is on a team friendly contract in the process would have exacerbated this mistake.

The question now is - what are the Jets going to do for a 2C? Perfetti ain't it and apparently Viliardi is not a C.

Dach’s 38-point “break-out” season was him playing on the wing more than at center. His production was largely as a winger.

He’s not had any meaningful development at center so for you to pencil him in as your 2C is a huge stretch. Also…

 

SI90

Registered User
Jul 25, 2011
86,677
65,252
StrongIsland
It’s weird because I could see Villardi becoming at least on par with PLD or even better. I’m guess Kings really like PLD
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad