Speculation: Pierre-Luc Dubois Mega thread. (LAK frontrunner, but Montreal has circled back)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Naslundforever

43-67-110
Aug 21, 2015
4,231
5,038
Those garbage offers were going on since last offseason.

The “for free” and ”Dvorak, Kidney and Florida 1st” will forever be a meme on these forums. :laugh:
Well to be fair much of the fan base on hab board just figured wait it out one year and sign him for free, even if most see plenty of holes in the line up for him.
 

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
33,847
37,169
Personally I think PLD is mistake for Kings. He is never going to be more then 60-70 pt C who isn't all that great at faceoffs or any other facet of game

Giving up Vilardi is a mistake IMO

He is really coming together as player and is only 23

I think Vilardi could be a PPG 1st line winger for years to come who could be 35-40 goal scorer
PLD was doing well in the dot in the playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hn777

Guffman

Registered User
Apr 7, 2016
6,357
8,534
Pitching garbage deals was kind of entertaining though from my end. (can't speak for Habs fans). It was fun to gain the Jets fans ire with them! ;)

Realistically though, i knew the garbage offers wouldn't stick. Too many other teams would offer more even if it was for 1 year. I was wrong though - i thought he would go to the Avs. Can't believe the Avs gambled on a hobbled RyJo.

I do think Chevy comes out of this unscathed. Kinda happy for him.

Correct me if I am wrong but I believe that is what is called “trolling”. Honestly, that is why I gave Hab fans a hard time over these fake pitches.
 

bmr

Registered User
Jan 23, 2013
1,883
1,710
Personally I think PLD is mistake for Kings. He is never going to be more then 60-70 pt C who isn't all that great at faceoffs or any other facet of game

Giving up Vilardi is a mistake IMO

He is really coming together as player and is only 23

I think Vilardi could be a PPG 1st line winger for years to come who could be 35-40 goal scorer
Completely agree. Any trade involving Vilardi is idiotic IMHO.
 

Rob Sense

Registered User
Apr 26, 2015
2,550
3,189
Well, chances are you aren't getting a C at 5.

So that means either a C you draft at 31 OR someone you draft next year will be making a difference as either a 20 or 21 year old player in the league.

Can you point a few of those guys out? Guys who were drafted in 2020 at 31 or higher OR a high pick in 2021 that are carrying the mail at 2C for a contending team?

If not, it's because your statement that someone who is drafted this year will be a difference maker in 3 years is actually the ridiculous take
This is not the final NHL draft ever! We will probably be in the bottom 8 again next year and the next... Also...the NHL is implementing a new initiative this year...it is called "player trades" and it is way where some teams can acquire other team's players in exchange for players or picks. It is a novel concept!
 

FSL KINGS

Registered User
May 10, 2021
2,932
2,630
Personally, I think PLD is mistake for Kings. He is never going to be more then 60-70 pt C who isn't all that great at faceoffs or any other facet of game

Giving up Vilardi is a mistake IMO

He is really coming together as player and is only 23

I think Vilardi could be a PPG 1st line winger for years to come who could be 35-40 goal scorer
King's can't afford that cap hit & have too much money on the wings right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hn777

Naslundforever

43-67-110
Aug 21, 2015
4,231
5,038
If we were going to get him it was for free yes that was the plan all along its not hard to comprehend . It was always for free or just not getting the guy
I’m one of the most perceivably on board with his joining the habs and still I would not give anything but salary and whoever’r’s spot he’d be taking in return.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

Junohockeyfan

Registered User
Dec 16, 2018
15,088
12,825
Well, chances are you aren't getting a C at 5.

So that means either a C you draft at 31 OR someone you draft next year will be making a difference as either a 20 or 21 year old player in the league.

Can you point a few of those guys out? Guys who were drafted in 2020 at 31 or higher OR a high pick in 2021 that are carrying the mail at 2C for a contending team?

If not, it's because your statement that someone who is drafted this year will be a difference maker in 3 years is actually the ridiculous take
Last i checked, Habs traded for a big, young C in Dach who made great strides last season and is set to be the Habs 2C of the future. They have the answers from within. And they can double down at 5 if Smith is available (or even Leonard who can play C).

The point is - PLD at 9M AAV as reported would have been a huge mistake. And giving up a potential C in Dach who is on a team friendly contract in the process would have exacerbated this mistake.

The question now is - what are the Jets going to do for a 2C? Perfetti ain't it and apparently Viliardi is not a C.
 

Rob Sense

Registered User
Apr 26, 2015
2,550
3,189
Isn't the entire point of a rebuild to get lucky enough to draft a player like Dubois? Obviously if the Jets were asking for Suzuki, Caufield, the 5th overall pick or Slafkovsky that would make no sense for the Habs. But a late 1st rounder and Dach, who sucked until last year? You absolutely exchange those pieces for Dubois, lock him up through his prime and keep building. Habs wouldn't have become a contender or even playoff team overnight but they would be a lot closer.
You should send your CV to the 32 NHL teams as an elite GM candidate!
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
33,847
37,169
Correct me if I am wrong but I believe that is what is called “trolling”. Honestly, that is why I gave Hab fans a hard time over these fake pitches.
Habs want to add to Dach, not trade him away.

31st, Dvorak, Anderson, fairly decent prospects is what the Habs can part with at this point.

It's not that's what PLD's value is, or the old " he's not that good until he's dealt then your team is dumb for trading him" Habs just can't trade a lot of value.

Adding him to the team wouldn't make them significantly better. It would push them up from an 7th-11th finish to maybe a 9th-13th finish.

Cap hit at 9 mill just isn't that good, either.

Now, if he changed his mind and got like 7 that's really good and sucks the Habs missed on that.
 

Junohockeyfan

Registered User
Dec 16, 2018
15,088
12,825
Correct me if I am wrong but I believe that is what is called “trolling”. Honestly, that is why I gave Hab fans a hard time over these fake pitches.
Why do you take things too heart. You had to know that Ryder + Halak + 2nd was not a serious offer. I think the majority of Habs fans were basically saying "Habs are not in a position to give serious assets for a guy that we don't need as of yet". Habs have options from within.

Its shocking that people forget that the Habs gave up Romanov ++ to get their big talented 2C of the future. Then a year later Dach made great progress. So why change things?

This draft will be about drafting BPA. Whether its Michkov (my hope) or Smith or Leonard.
 

Mrfenn92

Proud to be American
Sponsor
Nov 27, 2018
33,585
33,729
Chicago,Illinois
You would not understand, it relates to hockey.
58BF8A27-4AD2-4B87-A711-E1C5C9ED5CD1.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: wraithsonwings

howkie

Registered User
Dec 13, 2014
4,295
2,637
Personally, I think PLD is mistake for Kings. He is never going to be more then 60-70 pt C who isn't all that great at faceoffs or any other facet of game

Giving up Vilardi is a mistake IMO

He is really coming together as player and is only 23

I think Vilardi could be a PPG 1st line winger for years to come who could be 35-40 goal scorer
PLD is 1 year older..
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,827
8,087
Last i checked, Habs traded for a big, young C in Dach who made great strides last season and is set to be the Habs 2C of the future. They have the answers from within. And they can double down at 5 if Smith is available (or even Leonard who can play C).

The point is - PLD at 9M AAV as reported would have been a huge mistake. And giving up a potential C in Dach who is on a team friendly contract in the process would have exacerbated this mistake.

The question now is - what are the Jets going to do for a 2C? Perfetti ain't it and apparently Viliardi is not a C.

At Dach's age PLD had scored 32 more goals and 61 more points in about the same number of games and he's only gotten better since. In Dach's "breakout" season he was barely more productive than PLD's rookie year despite playing in a much higher scoring league. Chances Dach will ever be as good as PLD is right now have to be less than 5%, maybe lower.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad