So what exactly is the plan in Buffalo? You still have a fairly impressive stable developing, so I'm assuming older stop-gap guys, such as Tanev, who still have some game left but aren't necessarily looking for the gross, longterm retirement contracts? If this is the case, you may want to keep Backlund on your radar as well. One year left and still has lots of jump. Could potentially transition down to a stud 4C and shouldn't break the bank on an extension.Agreed. And there's definitely an angle if the value is right between CGY and BUF.
You have lots of D and are up against the cap.
We aren't and need D.
Sadly, this thread is a typical hfboards trade thread, so you get crap like Faulk for 13 and Kulich, and there's no analysis to be done on either side.
Buffalo won't trade Tuch, even with how good Andersson's value is. Tuch is just too important to the post-Eichel anti-dickhead locker room vibes.
What were you thinking?Neil Pionk is a 2 way RHS #4. 27 years old with a couple years left on his contract. Good skater. Good shot. Plays a feisty game. 13th overall is a high price to pay so maybe some extra parts needed.
Neil Pionk is a 2 way RHS #4. 27 years old with a couple years left on his contract. Good skater. Good shot. Plays a feisty game. 13th overall is a high price to pay so maybe some extra parts needed.
So what exactly is the plan in Buffalo? You still have a fairly impressive stable developing, so I'm assuming older stop-gap guys, such as Tanev, who still have some game left but aren't necessarily looking for the gross, longterm retirement contracts? If this is the case, you may want to keep Backlund on your radar as well. One year left and still has lots of jump. Could potentially transition down to a stud 4C and shouldn't break the bank on an extension.
Andersson's a no go. Contract is too good.
Tanev or Hanifin would be on the table though.
Plan is seemingly straight forward (as far as we fans think). add a few vet dmen who play a more defensive game. Tanev fits.So what exactly is the plan in Buffalo? You still have a fairly impressive stable developing, so I'm assuming older stop-gap guys, such as Tanev, who still have some game left but aren't necessarily looking for the gross, longterm retirement contracts? If this is the case, you may want to keep Backlund on your radar as well. One year left and still has lots of jump. Could potentially transition down to a stud 4C and shouldn't break the bank on an extension.
I thought Jensen to Buffalo for their first was going to happen if they couldn’t get a deal signed. Jensen is perfect behind Carlson so I figured he’d be their top internal priority to re-sign but figured if they couldn’t agree to terms then Buffalo made too much sense.We had hopes of Jensen making it to UFA, but Washington getting him inked earlier put that dream to rest. I doubt the Caps would put him into a trade so soon after negotiating that deal which might be his last in the NHL. Have to figure he's settled, knows where he's going to be, will be around family and all that.
Plan is seemingly straight forward (as far as we fans think). add a few vet dmen who play a more defensive game. Tanev fits.
Add a goalie to go with Levi.
Probably maneuver one forward out (Olofsson) for a more defensive minded guy. Backlund fits that too.
That’s basically it. I’m in a group who think our 1st is available at the right value. 1st + ? + ? For backlund and Tanev could be something, depending on the ?. Hint: it won’t be savoie or kulich.
Durzi for 13 OA
This is an odd post unless you’re really fixated on the 4+ years RH part.Sorry to burst your bubble but you would need a top 5 pick + for that and even then I don’t see a team trading a young 2/3 RHD with 4+ years of team control. That’s just not going to happen. Top 4 RHD under 30 are already super rare. What you’re asking for a mid first round pick is insane
He is on the 22-23 Hawks. He might be that on a contender. Not sure.
We (at least, I) want another one because championship teams often have top-4 caliber defense playing on their third pair. Sabres are ready to raise expectations and stakes.
What does him being on the 22/23 hawks have to do with anything? Good players can be on overall bad teams. Hampus Lindholm was on the 21/22 Ducks and look how he's done since.He is on the 22-23 Hawks. He might be that on a contender. Not sure.
We (at least, I) want another one because championship teams often have top-4 caliber defense playing on their third pair. Sabres are ready to raise expectations and stakes.
Mayfield would look pretty good in that RD slot as well. Possibly Talbot as a cheap, stop gap goalie option.Plan is seemingly straight forward (as far as we fans think). add a few vet dmen who play a more defensive game. Tanev fits.
Add a goalie to go with Levi.
Probably maneuver one forward out (Olofsson) for a more defensive minded guy. Backlund fits that too.
That’s basically it. I’m in a group who think our 1st is available at the right value. 1st + ? + ? For backlund and Tanev could be something, depending on the ?. Hint: it won’t be savoie or kulich.
Definitely. I’m not using the untouchable word, but the only guys on the roster I see getting moved right now are Luukkonen, Bryson, Olofsson, and maaaybbbeee Jokiharju.Mayfield would look pretty good in that RD slot as well. Possibly Talbot as a cheap, stop gap goalie option.
What's the deal with Krebs? Is he in the longterm plans?
I'd be very interested in Pesce and we have a plethora of scoring wingers and draft picks. I'd imagine a deal could be worked out if Carolina entertained moving him.This will probably be an unpopular opinion amongst Canes fans but I would consider trading Brett Pesce.
28 y/o rock solid defender who can be a 2/3 with 1 year left at $4m AAV.
NY state guy as well so he’d probably be cool resigning in Buffalo.
Canes need scoring wingers but draft capital and prospects are good too. We have some young D re-enforcements that will be looking to make a jump to the NHL soon and we can’t afford to keep all of Slavin, Skjei, and Pesce.
Chychrun and Romanov are both left handed. Hronek isn’t really known for his two-way play either. Probably a decent #4 with tons of flaws. Also a year away from UFA.This is an odd post unless you’re really fixated on the 4+ years RH part.
Pre-prime defencemen the likes of which the Sabres need get traded for picks like this all the time: witness Chychrun, Hronek and Romanov all within the past year.
This will probably be an unpopular opinion amongst Canes fans but I would consider trading Brett Pesce.
28 y/o rock solid defender who can be a 2/3 with 1 year left at $4m AAV.
NY state guy as well so he’d probably be cool resigning in Buffalo.
Canes need scoring wingers but draft capital and prospects are good too. We have some young D re-enforcements that will be looking to make a jump to the NHL soon and we can’t afford to keep all of Slavin, Skjei, and Pesce.
Olofsson would be the obvious answer, lethal shot, 27 years old former 7th round pick, with about 80 goals in 4 NHL seasons.So who’s available as a winger. I should emphasize that Canes are ideally looking for goal scoring so the thing im unsure of is if who Buffalo would move there because I’d imagine Tuch and Cozens are off the table. We could go for more of a playmaker but they’d have to be dynamic in that sense.
This will probably be an unpopular opinion amongst Canes fans but I would consider trading Brett Pesce.
28 y/o rock solid defender who can be a 2/3 with 1 year left at $4m AAV.
NY state guy as well so he’d probably be cool resigning in Buffalo.
Canes need scoring wingers but draft capital and prospects are good too. We have some young D re-enforcements that will be looking to make a jump to the NHL soon and we can’t afford to keep all of Slavin, Skjei, and Pesce.