Jeffrey93
Registered User
- Nov 7, 2007
- 4,335
- 46
If that was a thing you had to prove, I don't think cities would be allowed to do anything without the threat of a lawsuit. I don't think there's laws against stupid business decisions. Cities waste money all the time, it's the "gift" issue that's causing trouble.
If this $100M was going towards an arena....I would probably side with Glendale. Because no matter what happens they are getting a venue that the city and their citizens will be able to use for 30 years or more. Is that a "gift" or "subsidy"...maybe....but it creates enough spinoff jobs and tax revenue to appease me as being "worth it".
But, $100M for parking rights??? To parking lots that the city arguably already owns? Then the over-payment for arena management....sorry. The two apart from themselves......would still wreak of a government handout. Put them together and place them into the story-line we have seen go on so far.
This is an air tight case for Goldwater. All they have to do is say "NHL....have you EVER had an agreement like this before? NO? We rest our case."
This deal is done....I'll have to read through the thread more...but we should be focusing on what happens when this deal fails....because it will.