. . . and how long before they start asking that the tax be increased (?) because they cant make a go of it, overestimated the runway yet again, geographical cure didnt take, on life support once more....
And that's why I proposed earlier that they amend Worsley's bill to build TWO arenas. You need a backup in case this doesn't work in the Mesa/Tempe area. I'd be building two arenas at the same time, the second one in Scottsdale. That's twice the construction jobs!
IA would love the options that leaves them: You could mothball one and just save it for your second 30-year lease that you fully intend to fulfill.
You could use one as your practice facility. Either way, you have an easy out if Mesa/Tempe doesn't instantly turn into sellout crowds every night at an average $100 a seat. Just tell people the location is the problem and move to Scottsdale!
But if I were IA, I'd get more creative with the situation. Having 3 arenas (counting Glendale), I'd play approx. 15 games in each arena every year - Glendale, Mesa/Tempe, and Scottsdale. That takes care of your supply and demand problem right off the bat. You can't sell 17,000 tickets in any of those locations 41 times a year, plus pre-season, but gol darn it, if you're only playing 15 games in each community, you'll sell out every frickin' game! Did I mention at an average ticket price of $125?
This would be a huge favor to the NHL. The whole model of communities building just one building for their NHL franchise is so out of date. Once this multiple-arena concept succeeds so dramatically in Arizona, I know we'd want a second building for the Wild in the Twin Cities, as it's well known nobody will drive the 10 miles from Minneapolis to St. Paul to attend a game.
Sunrise needs a twin building (at taxpayer expense, of course) in Miami. Dallas and Fort Worth. And why should hockey fans in the northern Bay Area have to drive all the way down to San Jose to see their favorite sport? San Fran or Oakland need to build the Sharks another tank to use 20 games a year!
But where I really think this concept would work to save a franchise is in Carolina. It used to be the Research Triangle area was thought to consist of Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill. Well, of course all three of those cities should have a Hurricanes arena and its dozen games a year.
But people tell me that big growth has occurred in Cary - so what the hell, have them build an arena, too! Each new state of the art arena gets 10 home games! Of course every game will sell out when you squeeze demand that tight! Bettman would love it!