- Nov 17, 2011
- 7,662
- 2,541
I agree completely with Montreal and Killion and others that the presence of the Tucson RoadRunners in the IA portfolio in no way limits the future of the NHL franchise.
So, please don't attack this post for that.
However, I think it is correct to say that:
There are 2 parts to the local situation that have bearing on a potential relocation. One is the NHL itself, the other is IA.
We can be absolutely sure that the NHL doesn't care one bit about where AHL affiliates are located. NHL always will leave that to the franchisee to figure out.
IA, however, is a different story. I believe that the presence of the Tucson team in the portfolio indicates that IA themselves do NOT want to move the team. To my way of thinking, this is borne out by all the evidence we have in front of us, to wit:
1- The purchase was heavily leveraged, leaving, we suppose, the NHL with lots of influence in what happens to the franchise.
2- The IA organization does not seem to be particularly well-heeled as sports owners go. Thus, putting 1 and 2 together it seems that this venture, as far as NHL goes, will exist only in Arizona.
3- If IA had any inking about moving out of market themselves, they have had many opportunities to do so, especially since COG voted to cancel their lease with the subsidy, coupled with the way things have gone in the last few months.
4- Road Runners in Tucson only adds to this narrative. It is not a tipping piece, it's only a small addendum.
In short, IA is desperate to stay in the market. If the team has to move, they won't be going with it. The AHL affiliate in Tucson is a small symptom of that.
And, we all knew that anyway.
So, please don't attack this post for that.
However, I think it is correct to say that:
There are 2 parts to the local situation that have bearing on a potential relocation. One is the NHL itself, the other is IA.
We can be absolutely sure that the NHL doesn't care one bit about where AHL affiliates are located. NHL always will leave that to the franchisee to figure out.
IA, however, is a different story. I believe that the presence of the Tucson team in the portfolio indicates that IA themselves do NOT want to move the team. To my way of thinking, this is borne out by all the evidence we have in front of us, to wit:
1- The purchase was heavily leveraged, leaving, we suppose, the NHL with lots of influence in what happens to the franchise.
2- The IA organization does not seem to be particularly well-heeled as sports owners go. Thus, putting 1 and 2 together it seems that this venture, as far as NHL goes, will exist only in Arizona.
3- If IA had any inking about moving out of market themselves, they have had many opportunities to do so, especially since COG voted to cancel their lease with the subsidy, coupled with the way things have gone in the last few months.
4- Road Runners in Tucson only adds to this narrative. It is not a tipping piece, it's only a small addendum.
In short, IA is desperate to stay in the market. If the team has to move, they won't be going with it. The AHL affiliate in Tucson is a small symptom of that.
And, we all knew that anyway.