Confirmed with Link: [PHI/WPG] Kevin Hayes UFA rights for a 2019 5th

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jtown

Registered User
Oct 6, 2010
39,619
19,685
Fairfax, Virginia
The Kadri point however is a good one. I may not agree with it, but the club is at the point where they do have to try and compete now.

To do that they did need to bring in another centerman after Nolan’s struggles and the unknown in Frost.

If I had to choose between overpaying for Hayes, or having to give up more assets for a better guy like Kadri I guess I can talk myself into being okay with Hayes.

Duchene would have been the ideal.

There is nothing to indicate this team is ready to win
 

The Madrigal

Registered User
Apr 26, 2016
9,172
6,453
In a simulation
I've made the Bozak point, as well, and I think it's an apt one.

Hayes will only be 27 and is an improving player just hitting his prime. He's got a lot of good years left. Bozak's deal takes Bozak through his age 34 season, and it was worth it for St. Louis. And they didn't even get prime Bozak.
Exactly and that is the point I was making. The Blues paid 5 million for three years of Bozak likely on declining years at 32 years old. On the flip side the Flyers giving Hayes six years means they are most likely paying for four prime years and then the last two years take him up to Bozak's age of 32. Again I am not going to say that Hayes at 6/36 is good value but it would be fair market value. We will have to wait and see what he gets though, it wouldn't surprise to me to see him get more since the Islanders gave Nelson 6/36.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghosts Beer

Rebels57

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
78,106
125,552
If we're on pace for ~105-110 points and have a need and can get a guy for 2 playoff runs, then sure.

How do we go from an 82 point team to one pacing for 105-110 points with Patrick/Laughton as the 2C/3C?
 

Captain Dave Poulin

Imaginary Cat
Sponsor
Apr 30, 2015
68,591
201,338
Tokyo, JP
Not sure why you think this is a bad move?

1. Hayes doesn't move the needle - he doesn't significantly improve us. I mean "significantly" - he's just not that good.
2. Losing a 5th-round pick, in isolation, is no big deal. But we lived through Holmgren, and we have seen Fletch undervaluing picks in the past. Call it a potential red flag. Having a stocked prospect pool is great, but it only takes a relatively short time before it starts to be depleted.
3. I ****ing hate Kevin Hayes.
4. He's the physical manifestation of the music of Nickelback.

I don't know, there are more reasons, but what's the point? We're stuck with him now.
 

JojoTheWhale

"You should keep it." -- Striiker
May 22, 2008
35,811
110,704
He’s the more skilled guy when it comes to creating offence, and a much better skater.

It’s about fit too, even with the overpayment I think Duchene does a hell of a lot more to move this group of guys forward than a North/South guy in Hayes.

He's flashier, yes. All I care about is effectiveness.

I'm glad you mentioned fit. How much of the offense from Duchene comes on the PP? Would he play PP1 here?

I haven't checked today, but if I recall correctly, Hayes is good on Entries but Duchene is still a solid bit better. That definitely matters on this team.
 

The Madrigal

Registered User
Apr 26, 2016
9,172
6,453
In a simulation
1. Hayes doesn't move the needle - he doesn't significantly improve us. I mean "significantly" - he's just not that good.
2. Losing a 5th-round pick, in isolation, is no big deal. But we lived through Holmgren, and we have seen Fletch undervaluing picks in the past. Call it a potential red flag. Having a stocked prospect pool is great, but it only takes a relatively short time before it starts to be depleted.
3. I ****ing hate Kevin Hayes.
4. He's the physical manifestation of the music of Nickelback.

I don't know, there are more reasons, but what's the point? We're stuck with him now.
With such a well thought out, rational, and reasonable thought process I'm really surprised people aren't taking your thoughts on this move more seriously. Especially the point in bold, that is some high level reasoning and hockey discussion right there.
 

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,767
16,523
Well said. This move not only doesn't bury Patrick, it enables him to develop at his pace with less pressure and likely easier match ups. There is plenty of room for both Hayes and Patrick behind Couturier to be productive and have success on this team. Most successful NHL team have three very good centers. I just don't understand how some people don't like the idea of a 1-2-3 punch of Couturier, Hayes, Patrick at center. That is a great blend of size, two-way play, production, etc and it makes the Flyers a better team.
The goal should be to have 3 good centers. Strength down the middle is of the utmost importance; center is the most important position on each line.

When the Flyers won the Cup, they had Clarke-MacLeish-Lonsberry down the middle. In 03/04, they had Primeau, Roenick, Handzus. In 07/08, they had Carter, Richards, Briere.

Sometimes I feel like fans are happy to settle with average or "good enough." If you want to be a really good team, you should want outstanding depth down the middle. Backstrom-Kuznetsov. Crosby-Malkin. Matthews-Tavares. Bergeron-Krajci. Those are just a few of the combinations you are up against in the East.

Patrick as a 2C just doesn't cut it at this point in his career. Now, adding a good 2C in Hayes and having Patrick as a 3C with upside? Much deeper, better team, and much less pressure on Patrick.
 

Jtown

Registered User
Oct 6, 2010
39,619
19,685
Fairfax, Virginia
1. Hayes doesn't move the needle - he doesn't significantly improve us. I mean "significantly" - he's just not that good.
2. Losing a 5th-round pick, in isolation, is no big deal. But we lived through Holmgren, and we have seen Fletch undervaluing picks in the past. Call it a potential red flag. Having a stocked prospect pool is great, but it only takes a relatively short time before it starts to be depleted.
3. I ****ing hate Kevin Hayes.
4. He's the physical manifestation of the music of Nickel back.

I don't know, there are more reasons, but what's the point? We're stuck with him now.

Hfboards designated poet laureate
 

Rebels57

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
78,106
125,552
Sign Panarin/Karlsson, trade for Spurgeon, and Frost plays 3C.

Panarin has been a lock for Florida with Bobrovsky for weeks if not months. Q hiring cemented that further.

Karlsson could still be in play but is believed to want to play for Tampa or New York.

Spurgeon is still realistic.
 

Tripod

I hate this team
Aug 12, 2008
79,231
87,012
Nova Scotia
You underestimate the incompetence of NHL coaches. :laugh:



He played well enough to deserve better than that.
Patrick had 11 points in 38 games up to mid Jan. He flat out needed to produce more. He is a #2 pick after all.

I believe in him and think he could be better than Hayes as early as next year. But he certainly has not shown he will be.
 

The Madrigal

Registered User
Apr 26, 2016
9,172
6,453
In a simulation
The goal should be to have 3 good centers. Strength down the middle is of the utmost importance; center is the most important position on each line.

When the Flyers won the Cup, they had Clarke-MacLeish-Lonsberry down the middle. In 03/04, they had Primeau, Roenick, Handzus. In 07/08, they had Carter, Richards, Briere.

Sometimes I feel like fans are happy to settle with average or "good enough." If you want to be a really good team, you should want outstanding depth down the middle. Backstrom-Kuznetsov. Crosby-Malkin. Matthews-Tavares. Bergeron-Krajci. Those are just a few of the combinations you are up against in the East.

Patrick as a 2C just doesn't cut it at this point in his career. Now, adding a good 2C in Hayes and having Patrick as a 3C with upside? Much deeper, better team, and much less pressure on Patrick.
Absolutely. The Flyers weren't competing in the east with Patrick as their second line center and a question mark at third line center.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad