Prospect Info: Phantoms (AHL), Reading Royals (ECHL), NCAA, Jrs., Int'l, etc. [The Fall 2022 Edition]

Status
Not open for further replies.
A couple questions for u for guys I'm intrigued by....

How has Attard been doing??? Will there be a full time NHL future for him eventually?

Also same for Emil Andrae... How's his season in Europe so far for those that have seen him... I've just been hockeydb'ing both

Neither have a chance here until everyone is fired.
 
Guy to watch, Hunter McDonald on Northeastern.
20 years old, Freshman year after a couple USHL seasons.
Defensive defenseman, 6 assists in his last 10 games, 7 points in 16 games second among D-men (top is 8) on the team.
+15, next highest D-men are +8, +6, +4. All are helped by Levi in goal (.930 Sv%).
Big boy, 6'4 205 when drafted last summer.
 
Hunter McDonald has 7 assists, and 5 of them are secondaries. He's 20 years old because he was a double re-entry. And he had 4 points in 24 games in his D+2 year on a powerhouse Chicago Steel team. The best thing you can say about him probably is that the Steel had him on their team. But players with absolutely no scoring profile at lower levels are pretty much guaranteeing to not hit. Even projection model breakers like Manson had decent Junior A scoring.

We know why the Flyers zeroed in on him. In the last 2 years every defender has been: 6'3 no scoring profile, 6'2 no scoring profile, 6'4 no scoring profile, 6'3 non-projectable scoring profile. It's pretty obvious how Fletcher/Flahr believe drafting should work.
 
Hunter McDonald has 7 assists, and 5 of them are secondaries. He's 20 years old because he was a double re-entry. And he had 4 points in 24 games in his D+2 year on a powerhouse Chicago Steel team. The best thing you can say about him probably is that the Steel had him on their team. But players with absolutely no scoring profile at lower levels are pretty much guaranteeing to not hit. Even projection model breakers like Manson had decent Junior A scoring.

We know why the Flyers zeroed in on him. In the last 2 years every defender has been: 6'3 no scoring profile, 6'2 no scoring profile, 6'4 no scoring profile, 6'3 non-projectable scoring profile. It's pretty obvious how Fletcher/Flahr believe drafting should work.
When you're talking later round picks, big defensemen with some mobility make sense, the days when top skill players fell that far due to size are over.
 
When you're talking later round picks, big defensemen with some mobility make sense, the days when top skill players fell that far due to size are over.

Well, I'm glad you settled upon a hard and fast rule with no factual basis. The days when you can find skill in the mid-late rounds is over! Glad we settled that. Me, I just prefer seeking out usable hockey players, whatever the particulars. No one cares if the Flyers take an interesting 6'3 player, that's not the point.

Seeler can barely handle a puck, and even he had 0.5 point/game in his D+1 in the USHL. 0.2 points/game for your USHL career in your 18-19 seasons is basically not a prospect territory. The Flyers draft for fit, depth, and lazily at that.
 
Right. Because any D-man who doesn't score is worthless.
80 D-men last year played 1000+ minutes and had less than 20 points at 5x5.
Jack Johnson on Colorado had 7 points.
 
Right. Because any D-man who doesn't score is worthless.
80 D-men last year played 1000+ minutes and had less than 20 points at 5x5.
Jack Johnson on Colorado had 7 points.

You do understand that the USHL is not the NHL, right? We are talking projection and skill scaling. This might blow your mind but defensive defensemen generally produce at lower levels.
 
1st rd York
2nd rd Andrae
3rd rd Attard

Offensive minded D-men with your top picks, because they go fast these days.
Defensive defensemen later on, b/c they're what's left these days.
 
Yes, the Flyers future offensive defense core is complete — fit pick time! — because of a former high floor 1st rounder who is being coached to not be passive and is still in the AHL, a small 2nd rounder with skating issues and projectable concerns, and a soon to be 25 year old with more skating issues and difficult style/effectiveness fits. More 0 point NHL defensemen please.
 
Actually, if we could keep Deslauriers and MacEwen on the 4th line with Sedlak, they'd be just fine there.
Because the 4th line guys tend to play limited shifts, you want energy guys who'll fly around, not so much skill guys who need PT to get their timing down.

The problem is that injuries have forced them up the lineup.

Wonder if there's something wrong with Lycksell, he was on a hot streak but his play has fallen off recently.
 
Actually, if we could keep Deslauriers and MacEwen on the 4th line with Sedlak, they'd be just fine there.
Because the 4th line guys tend to play limited shifts, you want energy guys who'll fly around, not so much skill guys who need PT to get their timing down.
Seattle have Sprong on their 4th line getting 8:14 per game at ES, and yet he has 8 ES points in 18 games.

You call Holmgren a dinosaur, and yet you are positively Cretaceous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad