No idea why he has taken a giant step backI don’t think he’s currently an NHL caliber player. Although I’m equally sure he will be.
No idea why he has taken a giant step backI don’t think he’s currently an NHL caliber player. Although I’m equally sure he will be.
I'll bet the over blown success rate for those passes in practice is part of the problem.The thing with Krebs is that he reads the ice and uses the space better than the other centers on the team. When he has the puck, he skates away from the D and slows things down, while all the other forwards tend to either skate the puck toward defenders in an attacking fashion, or they skate it torward their own players, limiting options.
Krebs reads the spacing well and slows the game down, which does create space for his linemates. Unfortunately, Krebs tries to thread miracle passes for the big highlight play nearly everytime he has the puck instead of taking the space, drawing in defenders, and then making the safe pass/play.
The athletes are too good at the NHL level to sneak passes through two defenders. Someone will always get a stick on the play when you try that. I am certain it worked for him for years in Junior, but he has to adapt. Trying to make those passes 12 times a game results in 11 losses of possession typically, and causes a huge amount of frustration among the watching fans... like us in this thread
I'll bet the over blown success rate for those passes in practice is part of the problem.
What's concerning to me, is that in the off-season Kevyn Adams said that he wants to ensure that he puts our prospects in the best position to succeed. He mentioned that he would rather have a player flourish in Rochester than just treading water in Buffalo.We are ruining his development. Give him consistent minutes in a scoring role and he will produce. His 5v5 game still needs work though so Rochester is a perfectly good option at this point.
No idea why he has taken a giant step back
the slot is rolled out on a red carpet the second our Dahlin-Power pairing steps off the ice.The problem is he’s practicing against the Buffalo Sabres defense.
If we send Peterka/Quinn down knowing that they already have dominated in that league might as well just close the doors to the Sabres arena because Sabres fans sure won't show up....like who are we replacing them with? The main reason you would want to send guys down is because they can't play in the NHL not simply because they are down in the lineup. I don't feel like Quinn or Peterka are getting ruined in any way.What's concerning to me, is that in the off-season Kevyn Adams said that he wants to ensure that he puts our prospects in the best position to succeed. He mentioned that he would rather have a player flourish in Rochester than just treading water in Buffalo.
What's odd though, is he will say that - but in the same vein say that he doesn't want to sign guys to "block" our prospects. I get not signing guys to a 7 year deal, but adding quality vets to shorter term contracts always made sense to me.
Krebs could be in Rochester right now flourishing on a top line role (they need centers anyways) + he could help out Rosen or Kulich on his wing. If there was an injury at center for the Sabres - Krebs could step in and he would need to prove that he belongs in the NHL each and every night. You could say the same about Quinn and/or Peterka. Since they've essentially been guaranteed an NHL spot and neither are going to go back to Rochester - there's no real consequence to not playing well. I'm not sure how that's so different than Adams "treading water" quote from the off-season. Could've signed a guy like Perron, Niederreiter, Domi, Kubalik - all who wouldn't have been here for longer than 2 years and could've helped this team in numerous ways.
At this point, you're right. They should stay up. It was my position in the off-season and currently that it would not have hurt to bring in 1 or 2 vets. Sorry if my post didn't make that clear.If we send Peterka/Quinn down knowing that they already have dominated in that league might as well just close the doors to the Sabres arena because Sabres fans sure won't show up....like who are we replacing them with? The main reason you would want to send guys down is because they can't play in the NHL not simply because they are down in the lineup. I don't feel like Quinn or Peterka are getting ruined in any way.
A playmaker without an NHL shot is easily defended. He may create space, but defenders are not worried about his finish so they take away the pass option and dare him to score. They won’t let him walk in alone but they are not worried about him as a perimeter threat without the gun. Olofson is a similar player but you have to worry about the snipe.No idea why he has taken a giant step back
Adam Oates built quite a career out of that as did Joe Thornton. Krebs biggest problem is he's not processing fast enough so his lanes close before he can make a playA playmaker without an NHL shot is easily defended. He may create space, but defenders are not worried about his finish so they take away the pass option and dare him to score. They won’t let him walk in alone but they are not worried about him as a perimeter threat without the gun. Olofson is a similar player but you have to worry about the snipe.
Oates and Thornton had NHL caliber shots. That is why they made a career out of it. You had to at least respect the shot.Adam Oates built quite a career out of that as did Joe Thornton. Krebs biggest problem is he's not processing fast enough so his lanes close before he can make a play
I just disagree. Peyton on the 4th line is working. He's fine where he is.They're treating him like a pariah playing him on the fourth line. Right now Thompson and Cozens are the best centremen on the roster. At the same time, I'd rather see Casey on the bottom pair, with Krebs getting access to more skill. Casey is more of the bottom line center than anyone on the roster. So honestly, trading Casey in a deal for a right handed defensemen makes some sense. Asplund is the bottom C when healthy. A line of Girgensons-Asplund-Jost or Okposo works for me. Keeping Jost also works, so we never have to see Bjork again.
Do we want he to be 4C? I think he was really decent with Zemgus and Asplund earlier. Or we want him to be 1C in Rochester with a lot of ice time and at PP1.I just disagree. Peyton on the 4th line is working. He's fine where he is.
Yes, this is not happening. I think if there was any kind of deal, then maybe even for RD prospect or RD is simpler than Andersson. But it's probably too soon.I want him to get better, raise his trade value and be traded to Calgary with Kisakov, two 2nds and Bryson/Fitzgerald for Rasmus Andersson. It's not happening but that's my hope and I'm sticking to it.
Krebs should be sent to ROC if they want him to play more.They're treating him like a pariah playing him on the fourth line. Right now Thompson and Cozens are the best centremen on the roster. At the same time, I'd rather see Casey on the bottom line, with Krebs getting access to more skill. Casey is more of the bottom line center than anyone on the roster. So honestly, trading Casey in a deal for a right handed defensemen makes some sense. Asplund is the bottom C when healthy. A line of Girgensons-Asplund-Jost or Okposo works for me. Keeping Jost also works, so we never have to see Bjork again.
Is it possible to evaluate a player only on points? Skinner can play two great games, score 7 points in them, and then do nothing for five games in a row. Casey scored almost all of his points at PP and his current line is doing little at ES. I'm not saying that Krebs was good, but the Mittelstadt line wasn't great either. They need to produce something at ES, or engage in physical play and play in defense, points on PP are also useful, but usually this is not enough.Krebs should be sent to ROC if they want him to play more.
he is nowhere near the level Mitts is.
Casey is 6th in PTS, just behind Cozens, while Krebs has 3 PTS in 17 GP
He can win Faceoffs and has the strength to battle for the puck while Krebs is still to slender.Is it possible to evaluate a player only on points? Skinner can play two great games, score 7 points in them, and then do nothing for five games in a row. Casey scored almost all of his points at PP and his current line is doing little at ES. I'm not saying that Krebs was good, but the Mittelstadt line wasn't great either. They need to produce something at ES, or engage in physical play and play in defense, points on PP are also useful, but usually this is not enough.
I agree that Krebs is probably better off playing a lot of time in Rochester at center, although he looked decent with Zemgus and Asplund, that could also be an option if Granato thinks Krebs would be better off in the NHL.He can win Faceoffs and has the strength to battle for the puck while Krebs is still to slender.
I would rather see him in ROC to develop his game, he is few steps behind Quinn & Peterka.
I would say if they play him as much as Mitts it would hurt the team more & their abilitiy to win games.
1c minutes all situations maybe a few double shifts and more practice opportunityIt's time for Peyton to work on his game every night in all situations in Rochester. This rotation is not serving him.