Garland was supposed to be a middle-six forward for Vancouver who was never going to get the PP time that he did in Arizona, so his statistics (such as they were) were already capped at a 40 point max and probably more destined to be in the 30-40 range and every Canucks fan knew that going in, at the time.Revisionist history, Garland was considered by most to be a very solid addition after some very underrated seasons in AZ. OEL, you are correct.
An EP trade next offseason is very unlikely to come without an extension in place ala the Tkachuk trade.But, Eichel had a long term contract with no trade protection. Petey will be one year from UFA.
PLD is nowhere near EP value-wise.The PLD trade only netted Villardi and a second. Kupari is already 23 - he could still turn into something, but very unlikely he's a star. Iafallo is good, but 29 and signed for 2 years. Kings also needed to shed cap.
EP is basically a 6'2 Jack Hughes that can win face offs, is on PP1 and PK1 and plays Selke level defense at 5on5. Hes not PLD.An EP trade next offseason is very unlikely to come without an extension in place ala the Tkachuk trade.
PLD is nowhere near EP value-wise.
Based on what?You're making the assumption that the team said to him "we're trying to build a contender, this will take time" when that definitely was not the case - the Canucks thought they were much closer than they actually were when Pettersson started his career there. On the contrary, if a player is told his team is close and they just need a little bit of this or that to contend, and they fail to even compete for the playoffs, you have to assume any player that cares about winning will question team management and their ability to assess talent and build a true contender. I think this is Pettersson's mindset.
And to your first point, there's a salary cap so this just wouldn't happen.
Vancouver can make playoff this year if they have no players injured and if goalie can be good.
They are not a top division team so for him what is a good season making playoff is it enough ?
I'd be willing to do that as a Hurricanes fan.Necas, Nikishin, and a 1st![]()
I think the Canes are tired of missing out on young all-star forwards since last summer (I know we as fans sure are; I am), and Pettersson is one of the better ones that could theoretically become available in years. If he becomes available, I imagine Carolina will make a fair offer for Pettersson.I agree but looking at how Carolina acquires players, it’s just not in their DNA to give up good young pieces for a bigger piece. But a package of peace, necas and a protected 1st is a good baseline
Not bad IMO.I was thinking Necas, Skjei (extended), Morrow and a 1st
I'd be okay with that proposal as I just said to LemonSauceD.I'm a Canucks fan and I'm down for Necas, Nikishin, and a 1st.
If Pettersson moves, I want him going to Carolina. They have some of the best young players in the league and can afford to move them.
Petey would fit in great down there too. In their defense first systems.
He's not. I've never seen him on our board, or cheering for the Hurricanes on the main board.You sure you aren't a Canes fan
Based on what?
They resigned Miller, they resigned Kuzmenko, they resigned Boeser, they traded for Hronek, they signed Cole and Soucey to bolster their defense.
In what world is not that trying to "build a contender". Yeah it doesn't work out sometimes. Again, it's tough to win in the NHL. Thats where my moment of hesitation comes in at before cheering EP on for this quote. If he wants to leave, do it as a UFA. Don't ditch the team because you didn't win it all.
All true (IMO). My point was that Peterson drives a lot of his market. If he says I’m only signing an extension with Boston, Vancouver either trades him as a one year rental or for whatever they can get from Boston. That’s the only reason I brought up PLD - it was rumored he had a short list of potential teams, and I believe that reduced the return.An EP trade next offseason is very unlikely to come without an extension in place ala the Tkachuk trade.
PLD is nowhere near EP value-wise.
He plays nothing like Jack Hughes.. like at all. Weird evaluation of your own player.EP is basically a 6'2 Jack Hughes that can win face offs, is on PP1 and PK1 and plays Selke level defense at 5on5. Hes not PLD.
the comparison is value to the team, not talking playstyle at all.He plays nothing like Jack Hughes.. like at all. Weird evaluation of your own player.
Lol. You are one of a kind zero....Truth hurts? They are at different stages but still suffering from similar results.
One team is failing to make the playoffs that should be
One team is failing to go deep in the playoffs that should be
Don't blame him
Canucks would do that in a heartbeat.Rangers were very high on him in 2017, we should be all over this.
Perhaps a package consisting of...
(Trocheck or Chytil)
+
(Kakko or Lafreniere)
+
(Schneider or Miller)
+
(Othmann, Perreault, or 2025 1st)
I think it's more about Petey wanting to put up another 100 point season before discussing another contract. Back to back 100 point seasons changes contract negotiations considerably.