GirardSpinorama
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2004
- 21,596
- 10,617
No, Hagg is similarly just an injury replacement like Lyubushkin. Think most would agree that Dubas gave up assets to clean up his own mess when all he had to do was not sign Ritchie.
Waived: Petr Mrazek (Cleared)
- Thread starter MMC
- Start date
FerrisRox
"Wanna go, Prettyboy?"
That is a hundred percent not true. The big consensus was that they Leafs had upgraded from Fredrik Andersen which was a laughable take from the get go, made particularly funny when the team that led Mrazek signed Andersen.
TheGroceryStick
Registered User
Imagine if he was Boston?!? And signed him....
Atleast we dusted our hands off with Ritchie.
I’m not sure what the heck is going on.
Leafs signed sateri. Why would he come play in the A?
Would kalgren be the backup?
Campbell
Kalgren/sateri
Mrazek
Kalgren/sateri
Hutch.
Phx goalie.
Makes no sense. If we are acquiring a goalie. Why sign sateri
If mrazek will get claimed. Why not just give a conditional 7th in 2025…. Unless he refused a trade?
If we waive mrazek. How can we have a goalie on emergency recall? Kalgren.
Campbell can’t play. If mrazek and sateri gets claimed who are our goalies?
Leafs signed sateri. Why would he come play in the A?
Would kalgren be the backup?
Campbell
Kalgren/sateri
Mrazek
Kalgren/sateri
Hutch.
Phx goalie.
Makes no sense. If we are acquiring a goalie. Why sign sateri
If mrazek will get claimed. Why not just give a conditional 7th in 2025…. Unless he refused a trade?
If we waive mrazek. How can we have a goalie on emergency recall? Kalgren.
Campbell can’t play. If mrazek and sateri gets claimed who are our goalies?
GirardSpinorama
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2004
- 21,596
- 10,617
I think most people would agree that Carolina is just a much smarter and savyer team than the Leafs. It was almost like Mrazek for Andersen trade, and I'd go with Carolina's management any day.
I can see someone taking Mrazek. He hasn't worked out in Toronto but his numbers up to this point have been solid. Whether he never settled, or has been injured or whatever, he's worth a team like Buffalo looking at him until the younger guys develop.
The consensus was that the team viewed Campbell as an upgrade. Which was justifiable at the time and even in the first half of the season where he put up vezina quality numbers prior to his slump in January. I don’t think anyone saw Mrazek as the starter but more as a veteran NHL backup(which sounded ok before he was injured in the first game and proceeded to put up career worse numbers)
cjm502
Bingo Bango!
Mrazek has a lot of talent, it sucks he never put it together. He always seemed a little overconfident or cocky to me, which isn't always the worst for a goalie, but in his case it certainly doesn't seem to have helped.
TheBeastCoast
Registered User
It is literally a conditional 2nd though? Just because you don't think it fits doesn't mean it isn't a conditional 2nd round pick. I would imagine they will likely just take the 3rd regardless.
TheBeastCoast
Registered User
I mean you are just wrong on Lybushkin. That is okay though we all have our blind spots.
Cotton
Registered User
- May 13, 2013
- 9,120
- 5,611
No you don’t, because that never happened, you literally conjured that up in your head, wrote it out, then decided to hit the post button. And you won’t bother attempting to back it up either.
GirardSpinorama
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2004
- 21,596
- 10,617
Arizona is guaranteed at least a 2nd round pick in 2025. Toronto has no control over whether or not the pick is a 2nd or 3rd, Arizona does. Semantics, but I just wanted to clarify that it is at least a 2nd round pick.
Anyways, its still not asset that a team should burn. Poor asset management to say the least.
TheGreatOne11
Registered User
Welcome to Edmonton? Lol I don't know, somebody grab him please, I hated this signing from day one.
Martin Skoula
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2017
- 12,094
- 17,054
What does "at least" a 2nd round pick mean? You mean "at most" a 2nd in 3 years, the other option is a lower pick.
cjm502
Bingo Bango!
I would think if any deal between Toronto and Chicago would include Mrazek going back to Chicago it helps Toronto capwise and gives Chicago a cheap veteran goalie for 2 years...
GirardSpinorama
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2004
- 21,596
- 10,617
The other option is Arizona's choice.
It could potentially be higher/better. For example, in 2023 the leafs could have a bad season, making their 3rd closer to a 2nd. Arizona could trade that away for a 2024 2nd or other assets.
Last edited:
Ok so if he clears. Toronto can “call him back up” as an emergency for 30 days right?
Still wouldn’t be enough time for the season.
Still wouldn’t be enough time for the season.
D Wakaluk
Registered User
I remember saying that they will drive him out of town.
I also remember some advanced stats leaf geeks bringing up that Mrazek will be excellent for them.
Such a shitty trade from the get go.
And no one will claim him
I also remember some advanced stats leaf geeks bringing up that Mrazek will be excellent for them.
Such a shitty trade from the get go.
And no one will claim him
The Hockey Tonk Man
Registered User
Foligno has actually been quite good in a 4th line role since he's put together a string of games.
Mr Positive
Cap Crunch Incoming
- Nov 20, 2013
- 37,534
- 18,472
