He almost always played with Stillman with a rotating cast of Melee, Lockhart, Page, Lefebvre on the other side so this isn't any great gotcha if that's what you're going for.
Not saying it was a gotcha. The point I was making is he didn’t score a lot last year either. So, this shouldn’t be a situation where we can point to his linemates.
I can fully get behind the system not meshing with his ability to score at a more elite level. However, this would be a question other teams management would discuss internally.
The issue with Beck, like just a fully offensive player with a lack of defence but scores a ton, is what ”type” of player the team needs. If there are multiple elite players available (and we don’t know that at all), the target for any specific team is the one they feel that possesses the attributes most required when we start looking at the type of trade package required.
This is not a knock per se on Beck. It would be better if Beck also had a consistent 1.4 points per game like other elite scorers that garner the high value prospect plus picks. In the absence of those demonstrated scoring stats (and a 15 game stretch doesn’t count as demonstrated performance), there either needs to be some form of non-scoring attributes that make significant impact on the ice or off it, or there needs to be a significant reason why a certain player hasn’t demonstrated scoring but would likely change in a new environment.
With all that in mind, what teams are the most likely teams to be targeting Beck as their #1 target? Of those teams, do they seem willing to part with a high value young player or can they even go there (no trade clauses).
Just because Beck is perceived as the #1 player available at the deadline, it doesn’t mean he is the #1 player on other teams wish lists based on their perceived needs. I think that needs to be highlighted as well. We don’t know what other high end players will become available. I know some have pointed to Barlow and Nelson as examples. The supply may impact value to a certain extent. I am NOT saying that means his value drops to some sort of ridiculous value. It means the components of the deal may not be as ideal as some would like it to be.