Peterborough Petes 2022-23 Season Thread (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Section7fan

Registered User
Feb 12, 2018
902
842
Will someone please ask Jeff Marek? He seems to be plugged in more than everyone on here.

Maybe if our unvetted insiders weren’t sitting in time out…. We’d know something.
It’s been so peaceful around this place without the unvetted insider.
 

Newbie Observer

Registered User
Feb 18, 2019
282
268
large sum for Beck but with another year left, will get those picks plus back next years tradign deadline.
 

Devin

Registered User
Jul 25, 2018
1,032
325
They will get 5 pick back minimum for him next year and a roster player similar to the Stillman deal
the one trade i think u guys got ripped off on.. too many picks for stillman but i dont watch him so maybe uneducated opinion
 

AGranderson

Registered User
Nov 20, 2022
389
226
Othman-Beck-Lockhart
Avon-Robertson-Hayes
Melee- Dubois- Stillman
Page-Lefebvre- Purdeller

A little something like that when everyone is available ?
 

cleodog

Registered User
Aug 12, 2022
73
127
Thinking out loud I know he looks like he’ll make it to pros one day but Tucker Robertson was drafted in his second chance year so he could potentially get sent back to Pete’s next year and Seattle doesn’t lose his rights am I correct on that? Or do they have to sign him cause he’s 20?
 

GermanSpitfire

EU Video Scout for McKeen’s | Rest Easy #13
Jul 20, 2020
12,398
22,449
www.mckeenshockey.com
Thinking out loud I know he looks like he’ll make it to pros one day but Tucker Robertson was drafted in his second chance year so he could potentially get sent back to Pete’s next year and Seattle doesn’t lose his rights am I correct on that? Or do they have to sign him cause he’s 20?
You could get him back next year, yes. Seattle has yet to sign him.

Don’t bet on it though.
 

Petes1

Registered User
Oct 26, 2002
1,004
178
Thinking out loud I know he looks like he’ll make it to pros one day but Tucker Robertson was drafted in his second chance year so he could potentially get sent back to Pete’s next year and Seattle doesn’t lose his rights am I correct on that? Or do they have to sign him cause he’s 20?

Ya, doesn't have to be signed until after his OA season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cleodog

cleodog

Registered User
Aug 12, 2022
73
127
You could get him back next year, yes. Seattle has yet to sign him.

Don’t bet on it though.
I’m asking even when they sign him. They don’t have to use a year of ELC do they since he was drafted in second year of draft eligibility. That’s what I’m getting at
 

GermanSpitfire

EU Video Scout for McKeen’s | Rest Easy #13
Jul 20, 2020
12,398
22,449
www.mckeenshockey.com
I’m asking even when they sign him. They don’t have to use a year of ELC do they since he was drafted in second year of draft eligibility. That’s what I’m getting at
Entry Level contracts only slide for 18 and 19-year-old players, so yes Seattle would use a year of his ELC if thy signed him.
 

OMG67

Registered User
Sep 1, 2013
12,084
7,828
I’m asking even when they sign him. They don’t have to use a year of ELC do they since he was drafted in second year of draft eligibility. That’s what I’m getting at

It would be rare that a back to back 40 goal player isn’t signed and sent to the AHL.

You have to remember that if Seattle doesn’t sign him this coming summer and sends him back to junior unsigned, there is no incentive for him to sign with Seattle. He doesn’t go back into the draft. He is a free agent. He can sign an ELC with any NHL team that suits his situation best.

If Seattle signs him, they will want the development in their hands in the AHL.
 

NorthernVoice

Registered User
Oct 5, 2017
1,358
1,644
lets see that DEFENCE!!
This can't be a Barrie guy (128 GA in 34 games, NEGATIVE goal differential on the season, middling penalty kill) calling out the Petes (106 GA in 36 GP, +25 goal differential, top 5 penalty kill) ability to keep the puck out of the net, right?

I'm sure Clarke will bridge that 30+ goal gap though, not like he was a complete liability at the WJC or anything...
 

OMG67

Registered User
Sep 1, 2013
12,084
7,828
Let me try to poke some holes in this for fun. And remember, this is just a for fun exercise.

The proposed lineup that has been posted seems very top heavy. Two really good lines provided BeckA nd Othmann click. The third line is going to have to contribute more as a shit down line. It doesn’t look like there will be significant offence coming from it. Stillman is fine at a point per game but Melee and Dubois are supplementary players. The fourth line is garbage but who cares? This means the offence is going to have to be carried mostly by two lines.

On the back end, White and Mayer will carry the offensive load. They are more than fine for that. No questions there at all. Zannetti, Smith and McCoy are fine as complementary defensive guys That can move the puck. Spearing rounds out the group as the team leader but injury issues are a problem.

Nothing wrong at all with Simpson in net.

Solid team for sure. Gotta hope injuries don’t creep into the top two lines. Not a lot of depth past those two lines. That is where the Achilles Heal seems to be, depth.

To me the success of the Petes boils down to the top heavy front two lines. They will need ot score consistently against the other teams in the playoffs. A team like North Bay has a lot more depth and a really good front line. Speaking from an honest position, I am not sure who to pick between North Bay and Peterborough. I tend to lean towards teams with more depth. Injuries happen and the depth comes in handy for injury replacements. I think I lean towards North Bay right now.

We wills ee what Ottawa does. If they do add Morrison, Mintyukov and another piece, I’d need to reevaluate the seeding.

I think Barrie sits in 4th at this point. Everyone knows my issue with Wright. And they really need to surround Wright with a couple players on top of him. We shall see what they end up doing but I’m not worried about Barrie at this point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad