Peterborough Petes 2022-23 Off-Season Thread (Part 4)

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sounds like he’s just here to skate but the article in ptbo examiner the other day stated him and Robertson wouldn’t be on the training camp roster but just here to skate. Doesn’t make sense
And took a run at Leet an 07 Rookie in one of the scrimmages. Not being a good "pro" doing that stuff.

These are some very very optimistic outcomes and it’s still not a good offence. I highly doubt McCue and Page get 10. Now I wouldn’t be surprised if Faulkner gets 10-15.

This is why I’m hoping when we do make trades we look to bring in a forward or two… maybe do something like Simpson to KGN for Thibodeau. That’s probably not a great example but something similar
Faulkner will score if given regular time and good linemates

Thought quizi looked good in net through day 1
Sensational camp this year. Great goalie
 
I think the Petes have something in both Liam Ladds and Carson Cameron I was impressed by both today.

My prediction for further signings this evening McGrail, Vellaris, Larmand and Leek.
I agree McGrail LD and Vellaris RD were top2 D men in camp not signed to a contract..but looks like only one got a contract.
 
And took a run at Leet an 07 Rookie in one of the scrimmages. Not being a good "pro" doing that stuff.


Faulkner will score if given regular time and good linemates


Sensational camp this year. Great goalie
Who was in net vs. Niagara on Saturday? and as well does anyone think that Avon could be back at sometime or are his chances good to play in the Philadelphia system.
 
Who was in net vs. Niagara on Saturday? and as well does anyone think that Avon could be back at sometime or are his chances good to play in the Philadelphia system.
 

Attachments

  • D665FE1A-9093-4F26-B909-CDF7CFF1C610.jpeg
    D665FE1A-9093-4F26-B909-CDF7CFF1C610.jpeg
    108.5 KB · Views: 5
Who was in net vs. Niagara on Saturday? and as well does anyone think that Avon could be back at sometime or are his chances good to play in the Philadelphia system.
If JR Avon was to return I doubt the Petes would trade him. In my opinion if Avon and Tucker Robertson were to return for their overage years they are two overages the Petes will keep unless there is an offer that is to good to turn down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WillardJFredricks
Lefebrve-Beck-Lockhart
Melee-Dubois-Purdeller
Leek-Faulkner-Lewis/McCue
Page-Partridge-Cadorin

Mayer-Cameron
Smith-McCoy
Woulds-Ladds
Velliaris

Quizi
Sztuska
Rye
 
  • Like
Reactions: Section5Petes
dont you guys have 3 goalies already signed?
They’re likely to deal Simpson at some point so that’s back to 2. And being a year younger, there’s an argument to get him games over Sztuska. Better than Rye. If they do deal Simpson he would seem like a great option to take over even with all the signed guys atm.
 
They’re likely to deal Simpson at some point so that’s back to 2. And being a year younger, there’s an argument to get him games over Sztuska. Better than Rye. If they do deal Simpson he would seem like a great option to take over even with all the signed guys atm.
agree but at some point you cant just sign everyone. how do you develop both rye and quizi? whats the long term plan in net? if you want a 3rd goalie, it should be an 07, not a 05, what if the johnston kid comes to camp next year, lights it up and you have 3 signed already?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Section5Petes
Lefebrve-Beck-Lockhart
Melee-Dubois-Purdeller
Leek-Faulkner-Lewis/McCue
Page-Partridge-Cadorin

Mayer-Cameron
Smith-McCoy
Woulds-Ladds
Velliaris

Quizi
Sztuska
Rye
Mccallum? I heard quizi going school routes I doubt they keep Lewis
 
I think that’s why he hasn’t been signed yet… waiting for the other shoe to drop first.

We will see, it may not happen still.
even three goalies, where the third goalie is an 05, is hard to manage. rye would be pretty pissed. is he truly worth it?
 
I really don't care if rye is mad he's 17 if quizi is better he deserves to be Back up when Simpson gets dealt and 3rd for now.
 
I really don't care if rye is mad he's 17 if quizi is better he deserves to be Back up when Simpson gets dealt and 3rd for now.

so then why sign rye him at 16 then? if you were not sure he'd be the backup at 17? especially if he had to move to peterborough to make it happen.

if rye is better at 16 then quizi was (im pretty sure he was), then of course he will be better, just as im sure there were better 18 year old goalies then simpson back in the day. sometimes you invest in a player you believe in vs another guy who may be a fraction better. and if they didnt believe in rye, i ask again, why sign him?
 
Best goalie gets the job i guess
thats fine, but then why spend $10k or whatever in education packages this year and last year, just to cut the kid. they already made the decision last year.

if its best goalie for the job, then dont sign rye at 16. leave the back up job open the following year. its not like ontario goalies can go to the ncaa, they never get options. what was the rush to sign him last year?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Section5Petes
Wouldn't be the first time someone including myself was wrong on a player. Players jump ahead of each other all the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad