Aerchon
Registered User
- Jul 20, 2011
- 10,573
- 3,797
The example you quoted is incorrect, Stamkos signed for 8.5 for 8 years. HOWEVER, if McDavid signs for between 13-14 million dollars that's 1.5 times the amount stamkos is making. Stamkos signed his contract LAST SUMMER.
When Stamkos signed that contract the Lightning had been to the SCF two years before and game 7 of the ECF the year before he signed. Stamkos lead the team in goals 6 times of the 8 years he had played, was a 3 time all-star, and had two 50 goal seasons before signing.
That's quite a resume to have going into negotiations, while being 26 and about to go into your prime. This was last year.
In 2014, Kane and Toews both signed for 10.5 AAV. Together, they had won the Stanley Cup twice and made the WCF twice before signing. Toews, 440 points in 484 games, was a 2 time finalist for the Selke trophy, while winning once, and won the Conn-Smythe trophy in 2010. Kane had six seasons over 65 points (493 points in 515 games) won the Calder Trophy, and Conn-Smythe in 2013. Kane had 91 points in 93 playoff games at the time of his signing, while Toews had 81 in 94 games. McDavid will be making 1.28 times what they both make.
This is only a 3 player example, however it is enough to make me think that this contract isn't because of inflation. We are massively overpaying for McDavid. He is worth it. 100 point season and arguably single handily brought the Oilers back to the playoffs. He will be the best player in the sport during this contract. One could argue he already is.
However, if this contract is because of inflation, this league will not be able to sustain itself.
The double comment was in reference to the players he cited like Seguin/Hall who make 6... Didn't think I needed to clarify that.