In the 4 years with Philly, he is tied for 12th in SV% with goalies playing at least 100 games....at .918.
He is tied with:
Dubnyk
Varlamov
Lundqvist
Anderson x2
Let's not pretend that this year Mason was the norm. And he did it behind a **** defense that he and Neuvirth covered up for....except this year.
Our young goalies are going to have growing pains and have bad years. Should we throw them away too once they do? Or should we look at the entire picture and make a decision?
Neuvirth had a much worse year and got a fat raise. He will rebound next year because history says he is a much better goalie than the one we say this year. Mason is no different.
No, he's not dog ****. Nor is he the second coming of Bernie Parent. He's a good NHL goalie, who very publicly stated he wants to be the "defined starter," getting 55 or more games a year.
I hope we can all agree that, short of Lundquist or someone similar, that volume of play is not out there. And that Mason is not someone we can rely on when we are ready to contend in 2-3 years. No one in their right mind will give a 29 y/o Mason 3-5 years.
None of this is shoving the guy out the door, being unappreciative of what he brought to the team, "h8ing on him" or any of the other 13 year-old girl talk that too often passes for analysis on the interwebs. I trust Hextall to do a reasonable deal, and to stick to his guns rather than give excessive term or excessive playing time to a good goalie with consistency issues that happens to be pushing 30.