I'm not going to argue that this team owes Crosby, Malkin and Letang and should still be trying to contend in their last few years, but I think there's a reasonable middle ground between "nuke everything outside of the core, leaving the team as a husk of its former self" and "pretend this team is still competitive and don't make any major moves".
Dubas’s plan must be written on the napkin inside of Ron Hextall’s cranium
PhYsICaLITy...
Gimme a break. This team won back-to-back cups staying away from the bullshit and outskating everyone.
Sure. That does not mean you have to go the bullshit physicality way. It is such an idiotic cop up for the lack of talent.Those days are over. Sid and Geno can't duplicate that anymore. Gotta adapt to survive.
You advocated for trading their entire top-6 wingers, their entire bottom-6, 2 of their top-4 D and their starting goalie, and said this team needs to "badly" trade all of that. Saying you can trade all of those guys but maybe 2 and not be hurt is....questionable, to put it lightly.
Idk, the comment just seems more "blow up this team" than any actual plan for how to rebuild it.
I do not disagree that you have to change the make up. My gripe is with the physicality cop out. It is not a solution that makes you a contender. The reality is, there is no way this team can contend in the next 2-3 years. You can had all the goons you want, won't change shit. The physical players worth something AND that would make a difference won't be available to us... unless we draft them.... which will not help the current core.That team and this team are utterly irrelevant to one another
The Penguins won back to back cups by cashing in on ELC's, Sid's true prime, and a style of play the league was unaccustomed to at the time.
I'll avoid the upper/lower case nonsense myself by pointing out the whole back to back nonsense as a reason to shape this roster in 2024 and/or keeping Sullivan around makes you sound more like a yinzer than anyone.
If we had the option, sure:
- Rewind the clock 7 years for Sid/Geno
- Get Murray performance out of Ned when Jarry flubs
- Land Laine to play on the third line
- Replace Carter with a younger version of himself for 4C
- Replace Graves with an Ian Cole type defender who will block shots, hit hard, and actually clear pucks
- Put Rust/Guentzel on ELC's.
*** Have half the league stuck on 2010's roster building while we and maybe 2 others focus on speed ***
...then sure, 2016 Penguins mold all day long. Stupid takes.
There are zero moves you're making to keep up with the speed of today's teams. Especially if you want actual skilled guys to boot. You win in this league by forcing YOUR style down the other teams' throat. Vegas did that most recently. Boston (somehow) does it nightly. This team is built to freaking trade chances but with Harkins on our side and Drai/Kane/Hyman on the other. It's an outright idiotic way to construct a roster knowing the variables you have to deal with.
Sure. That does not mean you have to go the bullshit physicality way. It is such an idiotic cop up for the lack of talent.
The reality is: this core want win another one. So we have two choices, we ride them until the end and the next 2-3 years are an extend farewell tour OR you trade everybody and start the rebuild now.
Adding physicality does not make this team a contender. It changes nothing. It is just a stupid cliché.
They tried to be more physical after the Cups and it was an adject failure.
I don't have much of an opinion on WHAT style/philosophy can make the team more successful.
I just know that SAYING "speed/skill!!!" over and over while actually going out there here in reality and playing like a bunch of risk-adverse geriatrics obsessed with set plays isn't actually a real team philosophy. It's cowardly garbage.
I'd take a Tkachuk in a heartbeat... but he won't be available to us. Let's say Brady Tkachuk was available, and he might be, we do not have the assets to get him... and if we do, that is just postponing the inevitable without making us a contender.How do you evaluate Vegas? I'm curious.
Florida?
The two teams that went the furthest last year and are favorites again - how do you evaluate them?
Because adding Reaves and adding Tkachuks/Bennetts/Barbashev's, etc. are totally different things.
Zero teams are afraid to retrieve pucks against he Pens. Zero teams are in a hurry to dish a puck. There is zero forechecking on this club with any sort of tenacity and folks are left wondering why so many breakaways happen and so many 'time and space' situations happen. When Bennett is bearing down on you, you dish the puck or slow down heading into the wall. The Pens? I'm just gonna keep skating.
Getting physical and adding fighters are not the same thing my goodness. We just don't need these 4 foot nothing guys and utter lack of give a f players on this team anymore. This crappy style is costing us and it's got Sully's fingerprints all over it.
Remember Kunitz? He was physical. Remember how much that changed the DNA of the Pens?
Who exactly has speed or skill on this team?
Aha! I see you've stumbled upon my point!
you meant best third line in hockeyAccording to our coach our identity line is Harks - Acciari - Carter.
Been that way going back to 2019 when we assembled the best 4th line in hockey via ZAR - Blueger - Tanev.
According to our coach our identity line is Harks - Acciari - Carter.
Been that way going back to 2019 when we assembled the best 4th line in hockey via ZAR - Blueger - Tanev.
What is it with Pittsburgh sports team coaches, particularly the Pens and the Steelers? It is like they have tenure built into their contracts.
Physicality is part of hockey. Not advocating 4 lines of thugs but one or two on a 23 man roster isn't a bad thing.Sure. That does not mean you have to go the bullshit physicality way. It is such an idiotic cop up for the lack of talent.
The reality is: this core want win another one. So we have two choices, we ride them until the end and the next 2-3 years are an extend farewell tour OR you trade everybody and start the rebuild now.
Adding physicality does not make this team a contender. It changes nothing. It is just a stupid cliché.
They tried to be more physical after the Cups and it was an adject failure.
you meant best third line in hockey
It is definitely weird and maybe a self-reinforcing cycle. Both coaches are similar.
I'd also add that you don't need to make everyone on the roster the same style. In fact, you shouldn't. The Pens won back-to-back Cups because they had a mixture of talent (Crosby, Malkin, Kessel, Guentzel for second one, Letang for the first one), physicality (Kunitz, Hornqvist, Cole), and speedsters (Hags, young Rust, Sheary) throughout the lineup.How do you evaluate Vegas? I'm curious.
Florida?
The two teams that went the furthest last year and are favorites again - how do you evaluate them?
Because adding Reaves and adding Tkachuks/Bennetts/Barbashev's, etc. are totally different things.
Zero teams are afraid to retrieve pucks against he Pens. Zero teams are in a hurry to dish a puck. There is zero forechecking on this club with any sort of tenacity and folks are left wondering why so many breakaways happen and so many 'time and space' situations happen. When Bennett is bearing down on you, you dish the puck or slow down heading into the wall. The Pens? I'm just gonna keep skating.
Getting physical and adding fighters are not the same thing my goodness. We just don't need these 4 foot nothing guys and utter lack of give a f players on this team anymore. This crappy style is costing us and it's got Sully's fingerprints all over it.
Remember Kunitz? He was physical. Remember how much that changed the DNA of the Pens?
If it is the Ryan Reaves type, yes, it is a bad thing. If it is a Tkachuck or even a Wilson, then, yes, it is an asset.Physicality is part of hockey. Not advocating 4 lines of thugs but one or two on a 23 man roster isn't a bad thing.