it's Andy, he would say 4 firsts are a bad deal.I really wonder who the player-for-player swaps are that Dubas is targeting or thinking about. Bunting from Carolina makes sense. Honestly, Mikheyev makes sense as well.
The comparables are tough - either I don't think a team does it or vice versa. Outside of those two, it's tough. That assumes they are talking a forward around the $4mil-$6mil range.
Kuzmenko
Gourde
Dvorak
Fabbri
----------
Schmaltz
Kane
Pageau
----------
Gallagher
Copp
J. Anderson
Burakovsky
Coleman
That's comparable "maybes" for the next three years (each section is when they become a UFA - first 4 UFAs this year, next three UFAs next year, and the others the year after).
If Kane is truly an issue in the locker room, maybe a Kane-Smith swap? Swapping for Dvorak and making him 3C could work well potentially.
Source?
My biggest concern is the value we extract in any and every deal. In particular WITH Jake. We need to hit a grand slam there. IF we do that the others aren't as is important because the return will be decidedly less. That's not to say you don't want to get a very good return on Smith and NED, .GUT. IT.
It doesn't matter how many roster players GMKD ships out, I will not be satisfied.
Pretty much. Gotta accrue some future assets. This team is stale.Guentzel and Smith being on this roster make zero difference in terms of wins and losses. Trade them, get picks, and we still will have the same record if they were here.
I actually would too. There is no reason to rade Guentzel to Edmonton.Would rather lose Guentzel for nothing than get a shitty 1st round pick and a nothing prospect and see him score 30 goals in the playoffs with McDavid.
but if the price is right...I actually would too. There is no reason to rade Guentzel to Edmonton.
Well, that's just utter stupidity. Getting nothing for a player of that caliber on a team going nowhere fast is ridiculous. That said I think we'll do better than what you allege, but if not I'll take the late 1st and prospect because we're not winning anything anytime soon regardless.Would rather lose Guentzel for nothing than get a shitty 1st round pick and a nothing prospect and see him score 30 goals in the playoffs with McDavid.
So, you'd rather get nothing? That's even more ridiculous.I actually would too. There is no reason to rade Guentzel to Edmonton.
It will be!but if the price is right...
Yea man, team gets to draft the next Sam Poulin while Guentzel wins McDavid a cup. Wooooo. No thanks.Well, that's just utter stupidity. Getting nothing for a player of that caliber on a team going nowhere fast is ridiculous. That said I think we'll do better than what you allege, but if not I'll take the late 1st and prospect because we're not winning anything anytime soon regardless.
Yea man, team gets to draft the next Sam Poulin while Guentzel wins McDavid a cup. Wooooo. No thanks.
At least you get something, to get nothing and let him walk would be poor asset management and Dubas simply won't do that. Besides, picking late in the 1st round doesn't necessarily equate to getting a nothing player. It's much better than nothing which you're suggesting. Him being here helps no one!Yea man, team gets to draft the next Sam Poulin while Guentzel wins McDavid a cup. Wooooo. No thanks.
Maybe they get a Patrice Bergeron, you don't know. But you don't settle for nothing. No GM in their right mind would do that.Now now... they MIGHT even get a Kasperi Kapanen!
Won't that be nice?
At least you get something, to get nothing and let him walk would be poor asset management and Dubas simply won't do that. Besides, picking late in the 1st round doesn't necessarily equate to getting a nothing player. It's much better than nothing which you're suggesting. Him being here helps no one!
Maybe they get a Patrice Bergeron, you don't know. But you don't settle for nothing. No GM in their right mind would do that.
I looked at '15 draft just randomly.Pfffffft THIS team? This team hasn't drafted diddly shit for like ten years. Even if they did they wouldn't actually put the work in to develop it.
If late firsts were actually worth much of anything half the teams around the league every early Spring wouldn't be hemorrhaging them as fast as they possibly could for the likes of Tanner Jeannot and whatnot. I don't care what they do with Jake frankly but if the package is centered around a bottom third first round pick it'll be a waste.
They truly have nothing to offer.but if the price is right...
... still f*** him and his eyebrows.Oh I guess he just sucks, then.
True. We could listen to country or gospel or prog. There's lots of options out there.Why is everyone think we're only dealing with EDM? Come now.
We're gonna get a haul for Jake, he's the Belle of the ball this deadline. How is our fanbase not seeing this?True. We could listen to country or gospel or prog. There's lots of options out there.
their first pick for the next 4 years?They truly have nothing to offer.
Because of everything we’re hearing from Friedman, Seravelli etc…sounds like the return will be a letdown…we’ll seeWe're gonna get a haul for Jake, he's the Belle of the ball this deadline. How is our fanbase not seeing this?
Depends on your expectations. What are they?Because of everything we’re hearing from Friedman, Seravelli etc…sounds like the return will be a letdown…we’ll see
I only mentioned how much I hate them as a trade partner is because I saw another poster mention them and I cringe every time I see it. If we're getting a haul as you suggest, we can't possibly be dealing with Edmonton because Edmonton doesn't have a haul to offer.We're gonna get a haul for Jake, he's the Belle of the ball this deadline. How is our fanbase not seeing this?
what team have you been watching? we've been letting plays walk for years now.No GM in their right mind would do that.