Andy99
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 53,014
- 34,808
LBI he saidNever said or Did Sully say LBI?? can't remember
LBI he saidNever said or Did Sully say LBI?? can't remember
I am sure its still something to to with his core. Takes a long time to recover from that (We have seen the same with Crosby)Did we get word on what the injury was?
Someone said foot because he blocked a shot, but of course the team hasn't verified. I'm definitely concerned about core/groin, because of his history, but who knows.Did we get word on what the injury was?
Sullivan gona keep forcing ruh and Heinen into the lineup until we lose another 7 in a row
That Dumo M-NTC looming large right now. Goddamnit.
Trade them DUHwedelI think the big issue with moving Dumo to Ottawa is they have LD. It's the right side that is the big issue.
Like Ottawa isn't going to not play Chabot, Sanderson, or Brannstrom for Dumo.
Say no more fam. Ruhwedel for a 5th.I think the big issue with moving Dumo to Ottawa is they have LD. It's the right side that is the big issue.
Like Ottawa isn't going to not play Chabot, Sanderson, or Brannstrom for Dumo.
Shared my view of this before, so I'll keep it brief.Please share your thoughts.
I'd like to know if we should be going after a bigger LD and a worse option for top 6. I'm all in on talent though.
The thing I think about is moving Pettersson, honestly, since he's signed for a reasonable hit for the next two seasons and doesn't have an NTC/NMC, but he's a solid top 4 guy whom you could sell to other teams has having uptapped top-flight potential. POJ can be the 2nd pairing guy going forward, and we could pull in someone more complimentary for both Letang and the top pairing.Shared my view of this before, so I'll keep it brief.
Don't know about bigger, but better LD would be my preference for sure. They influence results more than 2nd line wingers, and I don't believe in the strategy of relying on Petts, POJ being this good again. That's wishful thinking. We don't know if Smith will cut it at 3LD either.
Maybe it's not as fun with this approach, but I bet it would result in more wins. If we got another good one then I'd love our D-pairs going into the playoffs. We could win tight games. We'd get the puck into the hands of the forwards easier and more frequently. Someone like Rutta level or a bit better.
We only have 15.275M allocated towards the blue line next year right now. It's a great opportunity.
Yea I guess I was thinking bigger/better. Maybe another term would be a proven top 4 LD.Shared my view of this before, so I'll keep it brief.
Don't know about bigger, but better LD would be my preference for sure. They influence results more than 2nd line wingers, and I don't believe in the strategy of relying on Petts, POJ being this good again. That's wishful thinking. We don't know if Smith will cut it at 3LD either.
Maybe it's not as fun with this approach, but I bet it would result in more wins. If we got another good one then I'd love our D-pairs going into the playoffs. We could win tight games. We'd get the puck into the hands of the forwards easier and more frequently. Someone like Rutta level or a bit better.
We only have 15.275M allocated towards the blue line next year right now. It's a great opportunity.
Definitely doable if POJ is truly 2nd pairing caliber long term. I need to see a lot more before trusting in that though. Like maybe 20 games with Petry or something, against stronger opposition.The thing I think about is moving Pettersson, honestly, since he's signed for a reasonable hit for the next two seasons and doesn't have an NTC/NMC, but he's a solid top 4 guy whom you could sell to other teams has having uptapped top-flight potential. POJ can be the 2nd pairing guy going forward, and we could pull in someone more complimentary for both Letang and the top pairing.
Hard pass on trading POJ if he keeps this up. One of the better 3rd pairing performances I can remember.I suppose we could trade POJ or Smith for something.
I'm in the same boat. Seen enough exciting Pens offenses in my lifetime to be so hellbent for more. Just want the Pens to not beat themselves. Besides, this new D would probably boost our offense anyway, by getting us out of our end where someone worse wouldn't. Maybe he won't get the assist but the possession/zone time/high danger counts will improve. We've seen that with Joseph this year. A lot of high corsi nights.I am about winning games is more fun then losing with more goals so I am fine with however they would like to operate. I will add that if the cap goes up 4 million instead of one we can UFA hunt for both positions.
Feel like there's been so much hype on Chychrun that the cost won't be worth it at this point. There'll be too much competition and Arizona will continue to try and milk his value hard, since they barely have anything. He gets injured a lot too.I am against trading for chychurn unless they valued POJ or Smith highly where the value we have to add is not too bad. That is doable for me.
Not sure @Peat even said the Marino trade fit the narrative. Just given reason to why JVR would never be acquired by us.
Note anybody making around 1 million I am replacing them with one million players and don't count them as anything.
Zucker 5.5
Dumo 4.1
9.6 million off the books.
Top 4 slot + top 6 forward required.
Jarry raise from 3.5> 6 ?
Blueger 2.2 ? Do we keep him if we can get him under 3 million or is it time for DOC or Poehling to take it over. At 1 mil per.
Salary cap can go up either 1 million to 4 million.
If it is only 1 million that is
16.3 million
Starting goalie
Top 6
Top 4
4C
I think re signing Jarry is crucial so that's 10.3 million left.
I feel like the emergence of POJ and Smith 100% an NHLer could make up out left side.
10.3 to 9.3 million.
That's 9.3 million for a top 6 and 4C.
If we go cheap with Phoeling or DOC we can go big game hunting for a top 6 forward.
8.3 million !!
Could we go after someone like Bo Horvat if he makes free agency? I am not interested in trading assets but someone who wins faceoffs for Geno and just shoots the puck would be huge for us.
Note: yes I realize Guentzel needs an upgrade on the 6 million but the salary cap the year after may go up 8 million at that point. I think we will be fine.
Please share your thoughts.
I'd like to know if we should be going after a bigger LD and a worse option for top 6. I'm all in on talent though.
Pettersson has been good before he had a bit of a downturn in struggles and to me that was largely due to his pairing issues. Marino and him were never the right compliment and it showed and then the next partner Sullivan had for him was Ruhwedel which was even worse. POJ to me is starting to show his actual talent. It's clear you never saw him play outside of the Pens because what you see now is more of what he was doing in WBS and in Juniors. He's showing his confidence in his game. This isn't some lad that is on a hot streak, it's more or less a player finally figuring out how to play his game at this level after trying to find consistency in how his game should translate at the next levels.Shared my view of this before, so I'll keep it brief.
Don't know about bigger, but better LD would be my preference for sure. They influence results more than 2nd line wingers, and I don't believe in the strategy of relying on Petts, POJ being this good again. That's wishful thinking. We don't know if Smith will cut it at 3LD either.
Maybe it's not as fun with this approach, but I bet it would result in more wins. If we got another good one then I'd love our D-pairs going into the playoffs. We could win tight games. We'd get the puck into the hands of the forwards easier and more frequently. Someone like Rutta level or a bit better.
We only have 15.275M allocated towards the blue line next year right now. It's a great opportunity.
I think you and @Gurglesons mean TVR? He was a player I wanted on this team as the 3rd pair like a few years back, kind of gave up on that. I actually like Rutta and think Smith paired with him would be good rather than losing a Rutta type and adding a TVR but not having a Rutta type at all on the blueline which we need.He could be acquired as a free agent. Or by a trade via third team a la Streit and Tampa.
I think you and @Gurglesons mean TVR? He was a player I wanted on this team as the 3rd pair like a few years back, kind of gave up on that. I actually like Rutta and think Smith paired with him would be good rather than losing a Rutta type and adding a TVR but not having a Rutta type at all on the blueline which we need.
TVR is making 950k and is 31 and hitting free agency at the end of the season. I think another team will interest him more as a regular 3rd pair as there's no opening on the Pens RD side for a couple of seasons. I don't see him as wanting to be a 7th defenseman at all, there's a lot of teams that he could go to, hell he could go to Vancouver and sign a 2-3yr deal and he'd realistically move up to the 2nd or 1st pair with how bad their right side is. Rutta is solid, he is just stuck in the shuffle of a bad D-partner right now in Dumoulin.
I just want some garbaged cleared up on this team.
Dump: Heinen, Dumoulin, Ruhwedel.
Leave opportunities open for: Friedman, Smith, Hallander