I mean that’s the thing…there aren’t that many…the only one I can think off the top of my head is Ross Colton but there will be other teams with the same idea…are we going to offer sheet him? “Taking advantage” doesn’t like trading a good asset to Tampa to acquire him…maybe they’re hoping Tampa really wants to resign Colton and Killorn and they can swipe Point from them for nothing, like Vegas did to get rid of Pactches? Lol lolI wonder what players on cap strapped teams he’s gonna go after?
Making the playoffs shouldn't be hard, and I don't believe it is. This team had just about the worst regular season they could, all things considered, and they still only missed by a point because they shit the bed against the two worst teams in hockey.It depends what you mean by contending. I don't think they're a serious cup favorite any more, but I don't think a deep playoff run is impossible and maybe with some miraculous health luck and Dubas hitting homers with most of his moves...mayyyybe a cup is possible.
If they shoot themselves in the foot by not using all available assets it might well be though.
LA, Boston and Vegas are other teams that might need to shed cap. Iafallo, Arvidson, Hall, Grzelyck, Ullmark all seem like realistic targetsI mean that’s the thing…there aren’t that many…the only one I can think off the top of my head is Ross Colton but there will be other teams with the same idea…are we going to offer sheet him? “Taking advantage” doesn’t like trading a good asset to Tampa to acquire him…maybe they’re hoping Tampa really wants to resign Colton and Killorn and they can swipe Point from them for nothing, like Vegas did to get rid of Pactches? Lol lol
That’s because their words of planning to build a contending team while also building towards the future is not a possible task. It’s one or the other or you end up with neither.
I feel like Hellebuyck would cost a lot more than that, though. If the price is the same, you obviously trade for Hellebuyck. But I don't see why that would be the case.
And yes, I think Hall would fit. He kept mentioning how he wanted to take advantage of other team's cap situation and Hall is a prime guy to be available for no assets. Dubas also said the Penguins needed talent, and Hall is obviously very talented.
Yes, but those teams aren’t likely to give assets up for them…in other words, it’s still going to cost future assets to acquire them…maybe the only one would be a bad contract, like GarlandLA, Boston and Vegas are other teams that might need to shed cap. Iafallo, Arvidson, Hall, Grzelyck, Ullmark all seem like realistic targets
Yes, but those teams aren’t likely to give assets up for them…in other words, it’s still going to cost future assets to acquire them…maybe the only one would be a bad contract, like Garland
Hey maybe we draft the next Esposito and deal him for the next Hossa.Well whatever. At least we can be happy knowing we're drafting the next like... Colby Armstrong or whatever. And it'll be fun to run commentary on all the other teams picking the nice hunks off of the corpses of Calgary and other teams while we all get excited about possibly snagging some mediocre midget out of Vancouver because his contract sucks.
Well whatever. At least we can be happy knowing we're drafting the next like... Colby Armstrong or whatever. And it'll be fun to run commentary on all the other teams picking the nice hunks off of the corpses of Calgary and other teams while we all get excited about possibly snagging some mediocre midget out of Vancouver because his contract sucks.
Well, they’re all towing the company line of being a good team while still caring about the future.Right.
So pick one.
And they did. Hextall was publicly meant to compete while also building the prospect pipeline for the future, which is of course quite difficult.
Dubas is publicly meant to compete while building an organisation that can build for the future. Not a pipeline. An organisation. Building a superior long term front office isn't incompatible with competing.
So now I expect them to back their words up, or I'm going to enjoy being pissy about it.
Depending on how young young is, Noah Hanifin arguably fits as a guy he might pay big for.
Hey maybe we draft the next Esposito and deal him for the next Hossa.
f***, we're gonna finally end up with Garland aren't we...
Depending on how young young is, Noah Hanifin arguably fits as a guy he might pay big for.
Well, they’re all towing the company line of being a good team while still caring about the future.
How would you even go about trying to do that? I would say not trading 1sts or top prospects while also not trading off your current good players for futures.
It’s a recipe for being stuck in purgatory, but they’ll still be doing what they said they were going to, no?
Gross.
Again, my selfish wish is for this team to throw whatever they've got at landing a premiere winger for Geno's line. Nah, it doesn't fix the bottom-6, add anything to a lukewarm (at best) blueline, or fix the colossal issue in net--but it'd be more fun to watch two scoring lines working than all that other shit. And this team's done competing, so fun is all that matters anymore.
But fun is never, ever on the minds of FO execs or coaches, so...
a) To the best of my knowledge, that is no longer the company line. I am not aware of a quote given when Dubas arrived in which he said rebuilding the prospect pool was a major priority. Winning was, but not the prospect pool. Maybe I missed something but publicly, I do not believe we are in that position. If we were, I might be mildly kinder about it.
b) I would qualify what you call a recipe for being stuck in purgatory and call it a recipe for doing neither, which means they're doing absolutely nothing of what they said they would. See: Hextall, Ronald
a) To the best of my knowledge, that is no longer the company line. I am not aware of a quote given when Dubas arrived in which he said rebuilding the prospect pool was a major priority. Winning was, but not the prospect pool. Maybe I missed something but publicly, I do not believe we are in that position. If we were, I might be mildly kinder about it.
b) I would qualify what you call a recipe for being stuck in purgatory and call it a recipe for doing neither, which means they're doing absolutely nothing of what they said they would. See: Hextall, Ronald
I knew that suggestion would make you happy.