I agree but to be fair, Granlund was a +1 at 5v5 and had solid analytics in the role. He failed at the scoring part but he actually did fine at the not getting scored on part.
He had only a 1.98 GA/60 at 5v5, the ugly part was that he only had a 2.23 GF/60 at 5v5.
I have no problem with Granlund in general aside from us having no role for him on our roster, and with our coach passively aggressively playing him at center and on the PK to stick it to GMRH. We could pay Blueger a lot less to not score or get scored against much. We're wasting Granlund's best skill of playmaking with our roster and deployments, and I can't see that changing under Sullivan.
I would hope Dubas would sit down with Sullivan and ask him just how he intends to use Granlund, and if the answer is just "someone has to PK" I'd commence to trading him.
With the terrible FA class this year, if you made Granlund available for essentially free some team would essentially get him as a 2 year FA who is a perfectly competent playmaking top 6 winger and power play contributor.