Lust for Life
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2018
- 888
- 1,160
Would probably just give Poulin time in WBS to get back into the groove and into a good head space before thinking about the big club. Agree that he currently holds little to no trade value.
Not necessarily…is Jack Johnson a free agent?Curious to see what Dubas does about the top-4 LD. As long as its not Dumoulin, it will be a net positive.
Part of me that loves pain just expects for Dumo, Jarry, etc to just be trotted back out there.Curious to see what Dubas does about the top-4 LD. As long as its not Dumoulin, it will be a net positive.
I could accept any of the UFAs coming back, just not Dumo. Even if hes signed at league min, Sullivan is gonna play him too much. He should have been gone 2-3 years ago.Part of me that loves pain just expects for Dumo, Jarry, etc to just be trotted back out there.
I'd like to be surprised. Can we get into the Vegas mold of cutting bait when it's needed?
Dumo is by far the biggest culprit needed to be walked away from.I could accept any of the UFAs coming back, just not Dumo. Even if hes signed at league min, Sullivan is gonna play him too much. He should have been gone 2-3 years ago.
Yeah Granlund isnt being dumped. Bailey only has 1 more year at 5m.
Yeah Granlund isnt being dumped. Bailey only has 1 more year at 5m.
Curious to see what Dubas does about the top-4 LD. As long as its not Dumoulin, it will be a net positive.
Really sad. 3 2nds for a third of a year of Granlund.That just tells me that the price to dump Granlund won't be that bad.
I'd easily do 2 way down the line future 2nds to dump Granlund. Even if you assume it's twice the cost based on Granlund having twice the years left, I don't think a 2nd in say 2025 and 2027 to get out of Granlund's deal is an issue.
Really sad. 3 2nds for a third of a year of Granlund.
Don't get me wrong. Get the guy outta here. Lol
That just tells me that the price to dump Granlund won't be that bad.
I'd easily do 2 way down the line future 2nds to dump Granlund. Even if you assume it's twice the cost based on Granlund having twice the years left, I don't think a 2nd in say 2025 and 2027 to get out of Granlund's deal is an issue.
I'm not totally against moving Petts into 1LD and rolling POJ/Smith. I mean it'd probably be nice to strengthen it but let em play I say!I don't understand the consternation over the defense. Just having Dumo out of the picture and not sinking everyone he's with will be a net positive. Also the Defense had a major rash of injuries along with our #1D recovering from a stroke. It's likely not going to repeat
Even if they added no one, the defense isn't any worse than last year
A 2nd in years where we are trying to rebuild is annoying.
Over the years I’ve connected with many beer vendors….. I’ve never been known as one who shys away from a good beverage. Those are also good connections to have.I thought you just had a connection with the beer stand on level 2 of PPG?
That just tells me that the price to dump Granlund won't be that bad.
I'd easily do 2 way down the line future 2nds to dump Granlund. Even if you assume it's twice the cost based on Granlund having twice the years left, I don't think a 2nd in say 2025 and 2027 to get out of Granlund's deal is an issue.
Exactly right, we mortgaged the future enough, when we're undoubtedly going to be a lottery team it's just silly to give up high 2hd rounders when there are other options available.I'd rather buy him out vs go that route of giving up draft picks
Sharks have an interesting roster that have several pieces I could see coming and going in a swap.I wonder if the insiders are incorrect about the San Jose deal and it is actually something with Granlund around Kappo