Gurglesons
Registered User
To PIT: Holloway, 2024 1st, Foegele
To EDM: Guentzel@50%, 2026 3rd, Cajkovic
This would be a hilarious return.
To PIT: Holloway, 2024 1st, Foegele
To EDM: Guentzel@50%, 2026 3rd, Cajkovic
Switch out Foegele for Bouchard and then the Pens should do that lolTo PIT: Holloway, 2024 1st, Foegele
To EDM: Guentzel@50%, 2026 3rd, Cajkovic
It's all risk-based and Sullivan, much like his coaching brethren in Steelers headquarters is all about that high floor, low ceiling talent. And that conservative approach leaves you mired in mediocrity, especially since such an approach tends to bring about .500 performance anyway.
Sully would rather not make any changes. Why? let's play a game we did in my college statistics class:
Choice A Risk: Potentially Improves your chances 2%. Decreases your chances 2%
Choice B Risk: Potentially improves your chances 10%. Decreases your chances 5%
Sully is picking A every day of the week and twice on Sunday. I get it and if you are the Av's or Bruins you can say that is a wise approach. If you are a team on the cusp of the playoffs, why wouldn't you take that gamble? The loss factor is inconsequential because missing the Wild Card by 1 point or 10 points is irrelevant.
So we will not be seeing Ty Smith. A person who theoretically could boost the 1 area your team needs a major boost. Same for Puus, who seemed to give the PP some life. Those guys are too much Choice B where things could unravel for these youngsters quickly.
So not only can he not take appropriate risk analysis, he's a shitty coach to boot lol
Sully's from Boston, you'd have to make it all pictorial.Put this on a sign and hold it up during the game.
The kings don't have the cap space without sending back salary and the guys the kings would want to send back the pens shouldn't take.Grundstrom is not a young player anymore and isn’t very good…Turcotte doesn’t look like he’ll be very good.. maybe Kaliyev…hell, give LA both Jake and Jarry for Byfield, Kaliyev and a cap dump lol
I asked on the main boards, no reply as of yet. Not sure if good value or not. If the Preds want to make a run for the playoffs, currently 1 point back, would Kemmell, Novak and a pick (1st) move the needle? Preds fans would probably say no, everyone over rates their prospects. Might be too hit or miss for the Pens' side.The kings don't have the cap space without sending back salary and the guys the kings would want to send back the pens shouldn't take.
Also, Turcotte can't stay healthy, he cannot be the centerpiece of a Jake trade when he only plays half a season at most.
And Kaliyev, if kings fans are to be taken seriously, will be waiver foder more sooner than later. A very one dimensional forward who is a poor skater at the NHL level. He's a just a pilon with a good shot, you could probably pick him up for a 3rd round pick right now and kings fans would be elated.
I'm expecting something completely out of left field at this point.
Like something beyond stupid that dubas can sell as looking towards the future while staying competitive now. Like Jake extended with PoJ (because Sullivan has wrecked him so just ship him out with Jake not matter what) and a first for Zegras and Gauthier.
Zegras, who makes like 5 mil I think, is on the rocks with verbeek right now,.has been shifted to wing, and is reported to be on the block. The ducks top two centers moving forward are carlsson and mactavish, with gaucher projecting to eventually be a great defensive minded number 3. At wing they have terry for like 7 more years and strome and vatrano for the next 3.
They have an absolute crap ton of cap space, a really good young goalie, and the best prospect pool in the NHL with some great defenders coming up.
Jakes the guy you bring in to teach mactavish, terry, Carlson, and eventually gaucher/Perrault/pastojov everything he learned from sid about being a professional and Jake with Carlson put up more points each of the next 5 years than Carlson/Zegras does. They can easily absorb his salary moving forward and still have caproom to build around their core guys.
And Dubas can be like, "hey, ignore the missed playoffs in sids golden years look at how well zegas skates (and ignore his lack of back checking) and we got that kid that told the flyers to go eff them selves. Are you not entertained? Ignore Sullivan's ineptitude, that Zegras kid just scored a Michigan! Please like me!"
I am saying a move like that is the right one? No, giving up Jake AND assets for some flashy but damaged goods probably blows up in your face, (see LA with dubois) but something like that feels on brand for dubas.
100%, but in this type of deal with Jake it should be both!I'd rather target players already drafted (aka prospects) as opposed to upcoming draft picks.
They would be closer to contributing but probably cost more. It’s so hard to judge value of Jake as a rental. If he had two years it would be different.I'd rather target players already drafted (aka prospects) as opposed to upcoming draft picks.
Not interested in Zegras at all…if I’m trading w Anaheim I want Mactavish back at minimum or Carlson…we need a young center..not taking someone else’s crap back…otherwise just resign JakeThe kings don't have the cap space without sending back salary and the guys the kings would want to send back the pens shouldn't take.
Also, Turcotte can't stay healthy, he cannot be the centerpiece of a Jake trade when he only plays half a season at most.
And Kaliyev, if kings fans are to be taken seriously, will be waiver foder more sooner than later. A very one dimensional forward who is a poor skater at the NHL level. He's a just a pilon with a good shot, you could probably pick him up for a 3rd round pick right now and kings fans would be elated.
I'm expecting something completely out of left field at this point.
Like something beyond stupid that dubas can sell as looking towards the future while staying competitive now. Like Jake extended with PoJ (because Sullivan has wrecked him so just ship him out with Jake not matter what) and a first for Zegras and Gauthier.
Zegras, who makes like 5 mil I think, is on the rocks with verbeek right now,.has been shifted to wing, and is reported to be on the block. The ducks top two centers moving forward are carlsson and mactavish, with gaucher projecting to eventually be a great defensive minded number 3. At wing they have terry for like 7 more years and strome and vatrano for the next 3.
They have an absolute crap ton of cap space, a really good young goalie, and the best prospect pool in the NHL with some great defenders coming up.
Jakes the guy you bring in to teach mactavish, terry, Carlson, and eventually gaucher/Perrault/pastojov everything he learned from sid about being a professional and Jake with Carlson put up more points each of the next 5 years than Carlson/Zegras does. They can easily absorb his salary moving forward and still have caproom to build around their core guys.
And Dubas can be like, "hey, ignore the missed playoffs in sids golden years look at how well zegas skates (and ignore his lack of back checking) and we got that kid that told the flyers to go eff them selves. Are you not entertained? Ignore Sullivan's ineptitude, that Zegras kid just scored a Michigan! Please like me!"
I am saying a move like that is the right one? No, giving up Jake AND assets for some flashy but damaged goods probably blows up in your face, (see LA with dubois) but something like that feels on brand for dubas.
the pp needs more than one guy doing the right things to make it work. but i agree with your thought behind it.It's all risk-based and Sullivan, much like his coaching brethren in Steelers headquarters is all about that high floor, low ceiling talent. And that conservative approach leaves you mired in mediocrity, especially since such an approach tends to bring about .500 performance anyway.
Sully would rather not make any changes. Why? let's play a game we did in my college statistics class:
Choice A Risk: Potentially Improves your chances 2%. Decreases your chances 2%
Choice B Risk: Potentially improves your chances 10%. Decreases your chances 5%
Sully is picking A every day of the week and twice on Sunday. I get it and if you are the Av's or Bruins you can say that is a wise approach. If you are a team on the cusp of the playoffs, why wouldn't you take that gamble? The loss factor is inconsequential because missing the Wild Card by 1 point or 10 points is irrelevant.
So we will not be seeing Ty Smith. A person who theoretically could boost the 1 area your team needs a major boost. Same for Puus, who seemed to give the PP some life. Those guys are too much Choice B where things could unravel for these youngsters quickly.
So not only can he not take appropriate risk analysis, he's a shitty coach to boot lol
Honestly, the best argument against a Jake trade is simply that we don't trust our scouts to target players worth bringing back.![]()
I asked LA and Nashville people and neither side thing that a Jake trade is right for them. Nashville is still in rebuild mode. LA is decent location but they don't want to spend major assets for a rental when they are WC1/2.I asked on the main boards, no reply as of yet. Not sure if good value or not. If the Preds want to make a run for the playoffs, currently 1 point back, would Kemmell, Novak and a pick (1st) move the needle? Preds fans would probably say no, everyone over rates their prospects. Might be too hit or miss for the Pens' side.
Kings fans are the funniest bunch. They are so, so conservative. They never want to make a move to make the team better. They are always not quite ready yet.![]()
I asked LA and Nashville people and neither side thing that a Jake trade is right for them. Nashville is still in rebuild mode. LA is decent location but they don't want to spend major assets for a rental when they are WC1/2.
Not interested in Zegras at all…if I’m trading w Anaheim I want Mactavish back at minimum or Carlson…we need a young center..not taking someone else’s crap back…otherwise just resign Jake
After giving up a kings random for dubois I understand being conservative.Kings fans are the funniest bunch. They are so, so conservative. They never want to make a move to make the team better. They are always not quite ready yet.
After the PLD trade I would be conservative tooKings fans are the funniest bunch. They are so, so conservative. They never want to make a move to make the team better. They are always not quite ready yet.
Saravalli did a trade matchmaker piece that includes Guentzel.
Here's his proposed trade:
To Colorado: Jake Guentzel (50% retained), Alex Nedeljkovic
To Pittsburgh: 2024 1st Rd Pick, 2025 1st Rd Pick, 2025 3rd Rd Pick
![]()
Playing Hockey’s Doctor Love: 2024 Trade Deadline Matchmaker
Which players and prospective new teams would make for perfect couples?www.dailyfaceoff.com
That seems underwhelming to me given how late the picks are going to be in the first round, the fact that the goalie market is very much a seller's market, and that Guentzel is being retained at 50%.
If we accept the "young player, prospect, 1st" as the framework and you say Neds is worth a 3rd, then two 1sts is an interesting return for a rental. I think that would be the first time that ever happened. Young RFAs, sure. 29yo rentals? No. Even though they are late, I don't know...I think we take that and run and then try to weaponize the cap space.Saravalli did a trade matchmaker piece that includes Guentzel.
Here's his proposed trade:
To Colorado: Jake Guentzel (50% retained), Alex Nedeljkovic
To Pittsburgh: 2024 1st Rd Pick, 2025 1st Rd Pick, 2025 3rd Rd Pick
![]()
Playing Hockey’s Doctor Love: 2024 Trade Deadline Matchmaker
Which players and prospective new teams would make for perfect couples?www.dailyfaceoff.com
That seems underwhelming to me given how late the picks are going to be in the first round, the fact that the goalie market is very much a seller's market, and that Guentzel is being retained at 50%.
Two low firsts and a third for a 40 goal scorer and a cheap borderline starter would be a huge kick in the dick.
EDIT: And Jake heavily retained? Whatever Colorado fan cooked that one up should try again.
It would also be one Sullivan loves.This would be a hilarious return.