Salary Cap: Pens '23-'24 Salary Cap Thread: "Mandrake, do you recall what Clemenceau once said about hockey"

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
We don't really have 2 scoring lines.

Was obvious in the Summer. Did plenty of goal estimations and by all accounts - we were gonna be short on goals this year. Here we are.
I'm not totally sure how Boston was typically setup, but something like this (averaging everything out per 82):

Marchand (24) - Bergeron (28) - Pasta (61)
DeBrusk (35) - Krejci (19) - Zacah (21)

Total : 187

Pens have :

Jake (39) - Sid (48) - Rust (27)
Smith (16) - Geno (29) - Rakell (12)

Total: 172


A difference, sure, but not 'greatest team in league history' vs. a non-playoff team.



After looking closer and to disprove my own point, they actually had more depth than I realized with Coyle (16), Hall (16 in only 61 games), Frederic (17), and Foligno (10 in only 60 games). Whereas the Pens have Eller (16), DOC (11), Carter (10), and.....that's basically it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KrisLetAngry
Speaking of Montreal... real cool to see how well Matheson is doing, there.

And by that I mean it's a kick in the shin. What a dumb offseason that turned out to be.

I mean... not that he'd be doing that, here.
Hextall just lost his f***ing marbles that day, both the Matheson and Marino trades were just stupid and unnecessary at the time. He could have done much better with those assets IMO

I'm not totally sure how Boston was typically setup, but something like this (averaging everything out per 82):

Marchand (24) - Bergeron (28) - Pasta (61)
DeBrusk (35) - Krejci (19) - Zacah (21)

Total : 187

Pens have :

Jake (39) - Sid (48) - Rust (27)
Smith (16) - Geno (29) - Rakell (12)

Total: 172


A difference, sure, but not 'greatest team in league history' vs. a non-playoff team.



After looking closer and to disprove my own point, they actually had more depth than I realized with Coyle (16), Hall (16 in only 61 games), Frederic (17), and Foligno (10 in only 60 games). Whereas the Pens have Eller (16), DOC (11), Carter (10), and.....that's basically it.
Bruins are not only deeper in front but defensively as well. They also play a system unlike us, as our coach doesn't know what that his. By doing so, their goalies look great as well!!

I'm sure once they move one of those goalies, that team trading for one will regret it big time. Jarry in Boston doesn't have 5 SO, closer to 10
 
Speaking of Montreal... real cool to see how well Matheson is doing, there.

And by that I mean it's a kick in the shin. What a dumb offseason that turned out to be.

I mean... not that he'd be doing that, here.
Throwing assets away because the coach is too risk adverse to let his youngish players play to their strengths.

The messed up thing is we’d be circling the drain near the bottom of the standings if they’d kept Matheson. Because you know Kris would be throwing games away left and right trying to be THE guy to make plays from the back end. And the coach would gladly let him rather than elevate Matheson into a position to be THE guy.

My question is why we couldn’t have multiple guys (Kris, Matheson, Marino) be THE guys? We had the horses to have an offensive-minded guy or guys on every pairing. But they basically throw them away because the coach is so fixated on age and experience. It took getting a HOF dman for him to be okay with having two pairings that can generate offense. It’s crazy how he’s been allowed to decimate the teams depth to placate his outdated visions on how teams are built and play.
 
Yohe’s article today basically screams: “We’re desperate to sign Jake and we’ll likely overpay” to his agent lol…this organization is so predictable…status quo and let’s all make Sid comfortable so we can wallow in mediocrity…I actually think the Canucks moved onto Lindholm bc Dubas told them we’ll be resigning him for 8 years…

“That chemistry is something Dubas recognizes, per Yohe, and plays into his desire to keep the winger with the Penguins long-term. Yohe cites a rising salary cap and “keeping [Crosby] with his preferred left wing for the rest of his career” as primary reasons why Dubas is amicable to an extension that will likely take Guentzel into his mid-30s.

Crosby’s desire to remain on a line with Guentzel won’t be enough for Dubas to lose out on recouping value in a deadline deal, however. Sources have told Yohe that Dubas “isn’t afraid to trade Guentzel, even if Crosby and [head coach Mike] Sullivan would prefer to keep him employed in Pittsburgh.”

I hope Dubas does it personally. To kind of say hey FSG you made me pump this wankers tires and he still can't win shit and now you want me to sign a player because another needs his winger? Nah
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy99
Outside of Edmonton who has high end talent. Colorado has but most teams have a couple stars but not a Sid. Pens can build with a very good roster here. Hake brings back top pick, very good prospect and decent LW.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheGoldenJet
I dont know if a 8.5 by 7 or 8.5 by 8 is an overpay.

hes a ufa and one of the best hitting ufa this year. Nylander just got over 11 million.



A 1st rounder + a guy who would be considered a top 3 prospect here. Is exactly what we need to get things going.

I am on the sign Guentzel train but if he is not signed and we let him walk that will be a disaster for us. We need a .625% rate to make playoffs. I don't know if I see us hitting that mark. I hope we do. Sign or trade Guentzel no walking.



I remember those posts in the offseason. Seems like there is some truth to that. Did you do them or was it someone else.
A top 3 prospect in this pipeline isn't exactly special. They got a prospect who isn't the best prospect on the average team and a late 1st, and took on a bad contract. That doesn't do anything.

Thats assuming he re-signs this summer. Would a high mileage Jake still have that value at 33? If he isnt extended by the TDL, thats a hell of a return on an expiring asset. Hunter Brzrtkjhrjghfjgh would instantly become our top prospect, and they get the pick back they will lose to SJ, plus a guy who scored 39 last year before a styles clash with the new coach.


Pacing for 100 points...imagine having a defenseman capable of that production :sarcasm:
Yager is a better prospect than Hunter whatever, and Kuzmenko is a negative asset atm. It's less a style clash and more him not shooting 25% again.
 
Danny Shirey has reached the same conclusion as myself





I mean, I'm fine with it.

But to act as though a late 1st can't become high-end talent.
All Star Games rosters: Pastnak (25), Aho (35), Debrincat (39), Suzuki (13), Barzal (16), Konecny (24)...

Just sorta stopped after the first division because the point has been made. Every high pick has a chance. The higher the pick, the better the chance. But there's no iron law that indicates that pick 20whatever acquired from Guentzel can't be a great player.
 
Keeping Guentzel just to let him walk is the single dumbest thing this team can do.

Re-sign him or trade him. You’re not winning shit this year regardless. Either re-sign him if you want to keep the charade up that this team is still competing or sell off and start the rebuild
If Guentzel was a 29 year old free agent from another team you'd offer him $9 million+ per year for 8 years?
 
Keeping Guentzel just to let him walk is the single dumbest thing this team can do.

Re-sign him or trade him. You’re not winning shit this year regardless. Either re-sign him if you want to keep the charade up that this team is still competing or sell off and start the rebuild

Shirey is basically saying "keep him and let him walk is the worst move which means it's the best tanking move."
Gross.
 
1706828364127.png
 
I couldn't disagree with that take any more.

Letting Guentzel walk is the worst possible outcome this side of giving him $11M/year or something.

Why is this year any better of a 'last shot' than next year IF they make the necessary 'difficult' decisions. Particularly the coaching staff, but Jake and some other roster decisions as well.

I will grant him that they aren't guaranteed to get high end talent by trading Jake, but you're a helluva lot more likely to find some with an extra 1st round pick than not. That shouldn't need to be said, but here we are.
 
Ftr I would rather trade Rakell or (esp) Smith than Rust, but I'm just assuming Rust would actually have value.
 
Shirey is basically saying "keep him and let him walk is the worst move which means it's the best tanking move."
Gross.
The worst move could be the potential negative value and opportunity cost of a prohibitively generous contract.

I think this is all academic anyway as the Penguins will know what's up by the deadline.
 
Keeping Guentzel just to let him walk is the single dumbest thing this team can do.

Re-sign him or trade him. You’re not winning shit this year regardless. Either re-sign him if you want to keep the charade up that this team is still competing or sell off and start the rebuild
it would be nothing new, how many years have we been doing the same thing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andy99
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad