Salary Cap: Pens '23-'24 Salary Cap Thread: "Mandrake, do you recall what Clemenceau once said about hockey"

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
If Guentzel was a 29 year old free agent from another team you'd offer him $9 million+ per year for 8 years?
If my team had any sort of skill in the top six.

He's a great complimentary piece.

Just not on the pens 2+ years from now when he's gonna be the only "skilled" player left.

Maybe dubas has some plan that gets skill back in the top six, but without sid, i don't want jake
 
  • Like
Reactions: tom_servo
Team needs to sell high on Guentzel and get assets to begin the rebuild. The core needs to see reality that theyre just not good enough. As good as Sids been, hes not even top-20 in scoring and Geno is no longer a PPG guy. With the big guns dropping off, they need more support from the bottom-6 but the team decided to put more on their shoulders.

Then theres Jarry. The rest of the core's careers is hitched to Jarry's wagon. As good as hes been this season, we've seen him lose the team elimination games by himself. We're also approaching the point of the season where he historically drops off hard, so he might just answer the stay put or sell question.
 
I get the argument for trading Jake if you think the Pens are totally done. I don't get the argument for signing Jake in that case, though
 
  • Like
Reactions: orby
I get the argument for trading Jake if you think the Pens are totally done. I don't get the argument for signing Jake in that case, though
I lean towards trading Jake, but if they keep him, I would be OK with it (pending the terms) because Jake is not the problem with the team. They could keep Jake, fire the coaching staff, trade 1 or 2 of Rust/Rakell/Smith, get a different mix particularly up front, let some of the young guys start stepping into the bottom 6 roles, and give it another go next year.

I don't think they are Cup contenders in that case, but I'm fine letting the stars play it out, make the playoffs, and maybe win a round or 2.

If they bring back the same roster with Sullivan and Co. again, though, I'll be spending a whole let less time following this team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BusinessGoose
"It's been so long since the Pens have been truly bad," declares the guy covering a team that hasn't seen the 2nd round in what is about to be six years running, and may miss the playoffs for the second consecutive season. :laugh:

I mean, I get what he's saying, the rebuild is gonna be downright ugly, but c'mon. It was an unreal era that produced 4 Cup appearances and 3 Cup wins, and saw two of the best ever to play hockey--one being top-5 all time. Also, I don't agree that tearing things down and watching a team full of underdogs with zero expectation of winning is a worse experience as a fan than watching whatever slopshit disappointment this team's been shoveling out onto the ice while JR, Hextall and Sullivan take sledgehammers to the end of the Sid/Geno era.

They're already bad, they're just not getting anything for being bad. They have zero shot at a Cup anymore and that's all that matters at this stage imo. Seeing it differently is just having trouble coming to grips with the fact that it's over, and probably has been for years. There's no "win a round, build confidence for the next season" stuff for a team full of mediocre 30 year olds and a core of 36+ year olds. But they're also too arrogant to declare the era dead and move on, so they'll either re-sign Jake to a deal at 150% his cap hit, further locking in a mediocre team, or they'll let an exceptionally valuable asset walk for free and call him their deadline rental. :laugh:
 
" But they're also too arrogant to declare the era dead and move on, so they'll either re-sign Jake to a deal at 150% his cap hit, further locking in a mediocre team, or they'll let an exceptionally valuable asset walk for free and call him their deadline rental. :laugh:
Not sure you can call any UFA "exceptionally valuable."

Sure, whatever assets they could get is better than nothing. But, nothing is also better than a bad contract.
 
Pens are a decent, inconsistent, frustrating, old, boring, mediocre team. They desperately need a youth infusion. If the PP was just league average they would probably make the playoffs. Trade Guentzel and Smith and fire Reirden since Sullivan is untouchable.
 
Team needs to sell high on Guentzel and get assets to begin the rebuild. The core needs to see reality that theyre just not good enough. As good as Sids been, hes not even top-20 in scoring and Geno is no longer a PPG guy. With the big guns dropping off, they need more support from the bottom-6 but the team decided to put more on their shoulders.

Then theres Jarry. The rest of the core's careers is hitched to Jarry's wagon. As good as hes been this season, we've seen him lose the team elimination games by himself. We're also approaching the point of the season where he historically drops off hard, so he might just answer the stay put or sell question.
This probably isn’t selling high on Guentzel.

Pens are a decent, inconsistent, frustrating, old, boring, mediocre team. They desperately need a youth infusion. If the PP was just league average they would probably make the playoffs. Trade Guentzel Rakell or Rust and Smith and fire Reirden since Sullivan is untouchable.
Fixed.
 
I like how most of his take hinges on a guy that was a 3rd pick from ... Nebraska. And that it's not possible to recoup any high end talent from whatever we'd potentially deal him for.
 
Not sure you can call any UFA "exceptionally valuable."

Sure, whatever assets they could get is better than nothing. But, nothing is also better than a bad contract.
The contract's not gonna matter to this team in a couple years--at least cap-wise, I dunno how stoked FSG is gonna be to pay that much to a Crosbyless paperweight. Realistically, they should probably be trying to land assets to take on other teams' albatross deals once Sid's done tbh. The issue with handing Jake a market value deal is that it's gonna come with a super restrictive NTC (NMC, probably, for the first several years) and a cap hit that when the team can no longer bury it's head in the sand and is forced to move him, makes the return complete dogshit. Even assuming the cap keeps jumping to make up for the Covid years of flat cap.

Vehemently disagree with the first part though. I think it's foolish to assume that Jake, particularly at 50% retained, doesn't have teams lined up around the block. Dubas would have his pick of returns, imo. Of all kinds; "keep pretending this team's relevant" returns, as well as a haul of futures. We see absurd deals for worse players every deadline. I still think they could've gotten a 1st for Zucker last TDL if they worked the phones, but Hextall was shitting his pants because the arena chanted "Fire Hextall" so he decided Granlund was his big redeeming move. :laugh: Jake easily lands what's more or less a king's ransom for a UFA, I'm pretty confident of that. A younger roster player, a prospect as good or better than Yager, and a 1st rounder--maybe more on top of that. He's got the statlines and resume that'd make GMs do silly stuff.
 
I lean towards trading Jake, but if they keep him, I would be OK with it (pending the terms) because Jake is not the problem with the team. They could keep Jake, fire the coaching staff, trade 1 or 2 of Rust/Rakell/Smith, get a different mix particularly up front, let some of the young guys start stepping into the bottom 6 roles, and give it another go next year.

I don't think they are Cup contenders in that case, but I'm fine letting the stars play it out, make the playoffs, and maybe win a round or 2.

If they bring back the same roster with Sullivan and Co. again, though, I'll be spending a whole let less time following this team.
I agree with you under certain conditions.
First, Jake has to re-sign for under $10 million per year.
Second, Dubas has to do the unthinkable again. Just as he moved out Granlund, Petry, etc, he has to move out Rakell, Smith and possibly Acciari. The production just isn't there for the cap hits.
If he can move at least the first two out, along with Carter's hit coming off the books, I might be able to accept holding onto Jake a couple more seasons. He should still have value then as the cap should continue to rise and I think his style of play should hold up.
But to let him walk for nothing would be completely asinine.
 
This probably isn’t selling high on Guentzel.
Lindholm returned a 1st, the third leading scorer in the OHL (a defenceman) and a decent replacement piece in Kuzumenko. If we get something close to that, thats a pretty high sell imo. Not to mention that the Pens could retain and get him to 1.5m with the help of another team. Other than being center, is Lindholm more valuable than Guentzel?

Guentzel is also the undisputed big fish of the trade market now, with the deadline only 1 month away. Idk, re-signing Guentzel to play with with a 37 year old Crosby seems moronic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheGoldenJet
Lindholm returned a 1st, the third leading scorer in the OHL (a defenceman) and a decent replacement piece in Kuzumenko. If we get something close to that, thats a pretty high sell imo. Not to mention that the Pens could retain and get him to 1.5m with the help of another team. Other than being center, is Lindholm more valuable than Guentzel?

Guentzel is also the undisputed big fish of the trade market now, with the deadline only 1 month away. Idk, re-signing Guentzel to play with with a 37 year old Crosby seems moronic.
if you think that's bad, just wait till we let him walk for nothing.
 
if you think that's bad, just wait till we let him walk for nothing.
The only way this is an argument is if the Penguins claw back into playoff contention, so, are you still selling Jake at the TDL if they're like 10-1-1 and in the 7th seed?

To me, if they're in the playoffs, they should keep him (and risk losing him).
 
The worst move could be the potential negative value and opportunity cost of a prohibitively generous contract.

I think this is all academic anyway as the Penguins will know what's up by the deadline.

I think hockey is shrinking in popularity but that isn't borne out by NHL revenues which are the salary cap. If the cap is $100M and Guentzel is 9% of that, who cares.

The door is fully shut on us either way, so indifferent to it all, but I could still see us getting a 1st for Guentzel 3-4 years down the line if we are willing to retain $3-4M.

Guentzel's gonna get paid by someone in July, it may as well be us since we don't care about the future anyway.
 
It's all well and good that we're kicking ideas around and discussing shit, but even as the person who wants Jake dealt more than anybody around here, I would be flat out astonished, pretty much into disbelief, if this team had the spine to make a move as cutthroat and forward-thinking as that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChaosAgent
Zegras would fit right in with his atrocious defense, buffoonish bad penalties at horrible time, refusal to shoot and just make cute stickhandles that more often then not lead to breakaways for the other team.
Sounds alot like our 2C now
 
Yes, McTavish for Carter, Harkins, Nieto and a bag of pucks…

seriously, this organization is so stupid if they don’t trade Jake because they’re “only” 5 points out of a playoff spot..

we’re already Detroit…just keep signing long term every 30+ player we ever loved

We need picks, not average to below average current NHL youth. Those guys aren't gonna prevent playoff misses or R1 exits.
There's no escaping what needs to be done. Best to just get on with it, instead of constantly messing around with a hopeless situation. They're not gonna win the Cup this way.
Picks are a huge crap shoot. If you are trading for average to below average youth you aren't doing your job.
 
"It's been so long since the Pens have been truly bad," declares the guy covering a team that hasn't seen the 2nd round in what is about to be six years running, and may miss the playoffs for the second consecutive season. :laugh:

I mean, I get what he's saying, the rebuild is gonna be downright ugly, but c'mon. It was an unreal era that produced 4 Cup appearances and 3 Cup wins, and saw two of the best ever to play hockey--one being top-5 all time. Also, I don't agree that tearing things down and watching a team full of underdogs with zero expectation of winning is a worse experience as a fan than watching whatever slopshit disappointment this team's been shoveling out onto the ice while JR, Hextall and Sullivan take sledgehammers to the end of the Sid/Geno era.

They're already bad, they're just not getting anything for being bad. They have zero shot at a Cup anymore and that's all that matters at this stage imo. Seeing it differently is just having trouble coming to grips with the fact that it's over, and probably has been for years. There's no "win a round, build confidence for the next season" stuff for a team full of mediocre 30 year olds and a core of 36+ year olds. But they're also too arrogant to declare the era dead and move on, so they'll either re-sign Jake to a deal at 150% his cap hit, further locking in a mediocre team, or they'll let an exceptionally valuable asset walk for free and call him their deadline rental. :laugh:
I have to disagree. Almost everyone on here had to have Karlsson "because at least he will be" fun to watch". Now he's here and they are still "unwatchable" So now you want to watch a product like the Coyotes for the last 10 years because that will be better? I'll have to pass. I'd rather watch a team with at least a shot at the playoffs.
 
Could be cool to get Vatrano and Lyubushkin for a small price. No idea what Vatrano's value is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulf5
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad