CheckingLineCenter
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2018
- 9,646
- 10,622
Most starts are on the fly. People give too much weight to OZ/DZ starts.
Not a viable solution. The fact that we didn't require too much retention for Karlsson is both why we got him for so little and why we got him at all.
If San Jose had wanted to retain more, we would've been outbid.
Not a viable solution with the current roster construction. What would have to happen for a third scoring line would be to move Malkin to Crosby's line and then get a younger 2C (Lindholm?) who can take defensive zone starts. In that case, the 3C (and 4C) wouldn't need to take the lion's share of defensive zone starts. As it is, with two lines each centered by 35+ centers, they need all the offensive zone starts they can get.
Most starts are on the fly. People give too much weight to OZ/DZ starts.
I know that Sullivan did use Guentzel-Crosby-Malkin as a line during the 2021-22 season after a successful PK. It worked at first. Then he stopped using it. I'm not sure if he stopped because the line stopped working or we stopped having successful PKs. Or some other reason.Yeah, I got that, but:
1: Cutting Malkin’s efficiency is never going to be the answer, when he responds much better to getting more responsibility than seeing who among him and Sid can turn down a shot to pass it back to the other with more artistry. I mean, we’ve had these guys long enough to know that the two-headed monster thing is not an actual thing outside of dire need situations. Maybe when Geno’s skating is shut, but then we’re f***ed anyway.
I was thinking that if it's Lindholm specifically, that'd be a next-season signing when he's a free agent. He was just an example of the type of 2C that we'd want.2: Lindholm is a pretty good player. Who are we dealing to get that kind of asset (and caproom). Say Guentzel and I say the first line is not genuinely improved, and the second line is very much limited offensively.
If we got another Top 6 center, that would push a current Top 6er, such as Rust, down into the Bottom 6.3: While it is true that it would make it easier to introduce offensive talent if we could give the third line less defensive responsibilities, you still need actual talent. If DOC is the most promising… that’s a steep climb. You might start instead by cutting those top6 percentages some. If you make a lot of them to begin with.
True, but there's a difference between an on-the-fly Zone Start where you've successfully dumped the puck and might be able to forecheck with speed and disrupt the other team's breakout, and one where the other team is already barrelling into your zone with speed.Most starts are on the fly. People give too much weight to OZ/DZ starts.
Sully is loathe to experiment, but I'm curious if they've considered swapping Petts/Graves.
I think this will be a good litmus test. If they come out of this stretch looking good, I think Dubas has to go all in with it. They really need a Hornqvist type guy, IMO.The next 5 are against some stiff competition.
Neither Letang nor Graves (nor POJ) are known for their brains, and they never will be.
As I've mentioned previously, Graves-Letang is not an ideal pairing for that reason unless Graves is willing to sacrifice 75% of his offense (a la Dumoulin, who never HAD any offense to sacrifice anyway) in order to cover up at all times for Letang's routine "uh-oh"s.
If the Graves-Letang pairing persists, Letang is going to have to be more responsible and understand that it's been quite some time since his speed (now greatly reduced from his peak years) allowed him to backtrack fast enough to erase his mistakes. What are the chances of THAT happening at this stage in Letang's career?
I don't know that asking Graves to be Dumo is a great idea. That seems to be more square-peg-round-hole'ing a guy that has failed so many times over the last 5 years.
Play to his strengths. Sure, maybe they give up a few more goals without prime-Dumo there to clean things up, but maybe having a partner who can skate, pass, and shoot leads to a few more goals for, too.
I wouldn't ask Letang to change much either TBH. Sure, it would be great if he made less turnovers or made better reads when pinching, but that's true regardless of his partner.It's never a good idea to ask a player to be something that he isn't -- if by doing so you're asking the player to sacrifice an integral part of his game. Graves has never been a defensive stalwart and isn't going to suddenly become one anytime soon. But he is quite serviceable defensively while bringing above-average offensive ability too.
At least until he starts being held unfairly accountable (by the coach, in particular) for someone else's mistakes in addition to his own, starts gripping the stick too tight and playing over-cautiously so as to avoid criticism from clueless fans.
But you CAN ask a player (Letang) to be more defensively responsible without neutering him entirely on the offensive side of things. See if he can be made to understand that he's not 25 years old anymore and that his partner (unless his partner is Pettersson) isn't going to always be there to cover for him during one of his ill-timed pinches or other frequent burps with the puck.
Not a viable solution. The fact that we didn't require too much retention for Karlsson is both why we got him for so little and why we got him at all.
If San Jose had wanted to retain more, we would've been outbid.
BINGO.......... People laughed at my bottom 6 comment, let's see where those same posters are about a month from now.Ok…well I guess the fourth line is not being shuffled any time soon lol…the praise for Carter is grotesque lol
![]()
'Unbelievable teammate' Jeff Carter and Penguins new-look fourth line hope to build momentum
Jeff Carter first became familiar with Matt Nieto during their Pacific Division battles, when the fast, feisty winger was starting off with the San Jose...www.post-gazette.com
Mark Madden
@MarkMaddenX
·
15h
Right this second, I’d take Trocheck. We’re not discussing HoF credentials. BTW, nobody gives a ***t that you played with Trocheck, &that’s totally irrelevant. Flounder McHearAttack Boys & Girls
Malkin >>>>> Trochek.I'm a big Trochek fan. I think he's one of the more underrated C's in the NHL. Him breaking that leg really altered the course of his career, and it's unfortunate. I think he could have been a true 70-80 point C who is super tough to play against, is scrappy, and can absolutely kill it in the dot.
no reason to do it for a good player.I know it's just an off-day nothing article to fill time but man does the entire Penguins ecosystem go out of their way to fluff Jeff Carter.
We really need Pickering and Yager to come along quickly. It'd give us necessary flexibility and two guys that should be more productive than what we have now - much like Rust and Guentzel were in the Cup years.
Not to mention every time Pickering even thinks about being in Pittsburgh he gets hurt.I don't that's likely. By the time those 2 are ready, the window will be closed.