Andy99
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 54,084
- 35,904
I would put “playing” in quotes when talking about Carter…NMC with a dude who seems to have no intention of not playing
I would put “playing” in quotes when talking about Carter…NMC with a dude who seems to have no intention of not playing
With Shea and Ludvig, along with Ruhwedel being a Sully fav, does anyone think Joseph may be on the trade block for a forward? I haven't seen much from Harkins, perhaps they want to improve there.
Looking at rosters, maybe Edmonton? Erne or Holloway for Joseph?
With Shea and Ludvig, along with Ruhwedel being a Sully fav, does anyone think Joseph may be on the trade block for a forward? I haven't seen much from Harkins, perhaps they want to improve there.
Looking at rosters, maybe Edmonton? Erne or Holloway for Joseph?
-pokes DOC-
Do something.
Harkins has been invisible, yeah, but so has DOC. /shrugNo shea and Ludwig aren’t even nhlers yet. Poj isn’t being moved now
He look good in stretches last night. Harkins is invisible. I honestly forgot he was on the team
It's hard to see how they make the bottom 6 a positive. Carter isn't going anywhere so that's your 4th line budget shot even if you put him next to 2 league minimum guys. He's not Gladams bad yet, but he's past the point of consistent positive contributions. That line will be neutral at best.From latest Pensburgh article…I don’t think this strategy is sustainable for even 75% of the season lol
“In essence, and as was pretty evident and pretty much admitted from the front office - the Pens are going to try and play to a draw when 87 and 71 aren’t on the ice and count on their PK and goalies to hold up their end of the bargain.
Then, the big boys need to feast and supply enough offense to win games. Aside from some unfortunate bounces in the opener, the plan has gotten off to exactly the start that was imagined.”
Harkins has been invisible, yeah, but so has DOC. /shrug
They're both -1, zero points, and they have 3 and 2 shots respectively through three games.![]()
Agree with the assessment of his play, but if Dubas and team love the player from what they have seen in previous years then there are worse things to do then give him an extended tryout. Worst case you dump him on the baby Pens next month and try one of the guys you already saw in camp.Ya what irks me is Harkins didn’t have a great preseason here but was gifted that spot. I’d like to see them bring up a 13th forward to try new combos.
He played 2 games with Pens & was goodYa what irks me is Harkins didn’t have a great preseason here but was gifted that spot. I’d like to see them bring up a 13th forward to try new combos.
Because people who shit their pants about players have to find new players because Dubas got rid of them all but Carter who he can'tHarkins hasn't been worse than O'Connor, so I'm confused for why this place is complaining about Harkins but seemingly praising O'Connor.
I've seen more people suggest playing O'Connor in the top-6 than people criticizing O'Connor for being invisible this year. Really bizarre double standard on here.
He played 2 games with Pens & was good
For specific numbers:
Harkins: 3 shots, 5 shot attempts, 3 high danger shot attempts, 4 hits and 1 blocked shot
O'Connor: 2 shots, 4 shot attempts, 0 high danger shot attempts, 0 hits and 0 blocked shots
Harkins hasn't been anything special, but the process there with him is definitely what you want out of an energy bottom-6 forward. He's playing with energy, throwing his weight around and is at least getting to the high danger areas and dirty areas. O'Connor is doing pretty much nothing.
I agree O'Connor has been mediocre too. I wouldn't lose a minute of sleep if him and POJ were traded as a package for a better forward option. I just like the pace of play he can bring. I'll take even goals against the opposition if you and gasing them out making them chase you around on the cycle.Harkins hasn't been worse than O'Connor, so I'm confused for why this place is complaining about Harkins but seemingly praising O'Connor.
I've seen more people suggest playing O'Connor in the top-6 than people criticizing O'Connor for being invisible this year. Really bizarre double standard on here.
Hows the bottom six going to play to a draw when they can't produce at all or pert near? If they can play to a draw that'd be great, but they can't. Therein lies the rub.From latest Pensburgh article…I don’t think this strategy is sustainable for even 75% of the season lol
“In essence, and as was pretty evident and pretty much admitted from the front office - the Pens are going to try and play to a draw when 87 and 71 aren’t on the ice and count on their PK and goalies to hold up their end of the bargain.
Then, the big boys need to feast and supply enough offense to win games. Aside from some unfortunate bounces in the opener, the plan has gotten off to exactly the start that was imagined.”
Honestly there isn’t one guy in the bottom six I wouldn’t be willing to replace with Zohorna, Poulin, Hino, White, Puusty etc…I liked some of Eller’s game but he shouldn’t be taking all these penalties…Sullivan should be trying out other players there on a regular basis…keeping up 8 D isn’t helping matters…waive one, bring up an additional forward and sit someone in the bottom six (preferably Carter) …if that player isn’t cutting it, bring up someone else…he’s got like 9 games for each player to figure it out before the waiver wire hits again, so use it
For example, could go
DOC-Eller-Zohorna
Nieto-Acciari-Harkins
DOC-Eller-Acciari
Nieto-Zohorna-Harkins
Regarding 4th line, They're not trending that way to this point.I’d expect Nieto, Acciari & Carter to score about 30 ES goals total if they’re on the 4th line all or a majority of the year. If they can do that, be competent defensively and reasonably physical, and PK, I’m good.