GDT: Pens 2024 Trade Deadline Thread: Jake Shake Talk here

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I suppose I see the rationale in spray and pray strats. Even the Canes' best prospects are still prospects and it's a crapshoot. But man, what an underwhelming return on paper. Doubt it looks better in reality down the road either.
When we compare it to some of the trades made this week, KD did not do bad at all to be honest. Had we not heard Morrow or Blake's name, some of you wouldn't have acted this way. They're still excellent prospects and all of them are having fantastic seasons
 
The more I think about it, the more that bothers me.

Dubas seemed to go "quantity over quality". I think I would have rather him done a 1 for 1 where it was Jake for a 1st or Jake for a top prospect rather than getting quantity but nothing that's great.

Meh, I don't know if there's a big difference between a late 1st (25th or so) and three second rounders (if that's what you wanna call the russian and the finn, plus the cond. second).
 
It's going to be hard to move him, but the only one I really want gone is Carter. Eller and Smith can come back I don't care, they can be moved next season!
 
Yes. Kyle Dubas has no plan as I've tried to tell you all for the last 9 months.
Such a cute "phrase" - "has no plan".

What should his plan look like? Legit spell it out "He should do this, then that, and then this." Use big boy words not "He should trade crappy prospects for impact wings on good deals".

As I usually say, name names.

If you don't, you're just whining.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pensfan71
Such a cute "phrase" - "has no plan".

What should his plan look like? Legit spell it out "He should do this, then that, and then this." Use big boy words not "He should trade crappy prospects for impact wings on good deals".

As I usually say, name names.

If you don't, you're just whining.

I named names the entire offseason of what he should do.

It must be really hard to get paid 45 million dollars to botch every decision you make.
 
When we compare it to some of the trades made this week, KD did not do bad at all to be honest. Had we not heard Morrow or Blake's name, some of you wouldn't have acted this way. They're still excellent prospects and all of them are having fantastic seasons
They are in no way excellent prospects, my dude. :laugh:

This team's prospect pool has been utter trash for a decade and the guys they brought in probably aren't even top-3 *here*. We'll see how they end up, but there's no way to spin this as "Dubas kinda did well" imo.
 
Here: The Devil because Mike Sullivan likes him.

Reality: Average 3rd pairing RD who is a solid depth pickup piece for the playoffs. It's a good deal.
I don't agree with the "reality" part. I don't think he's a guy you want on your third pairing as a regular. His ideal role is as the 7th or 8th who can fill in adequately for short periods of time on the third pairing. But if he's your permanent 3rd pairing guy, you've got a shitty third pairing.
 
Such a cute "phrase" - "has no plan".

What should his plan look like? Legit spell it out "He should do this, then that, and then this." Use big boy words not "He should trade crappy prospects for impact wings on good deals".

As I usually say, name names.

If you don't, you're just whining.
A good start would be getting rid of the coaching staff
 
  • Like
Reactions: BusinessGoose
I don't want Guentzel back. He's a great player and I'll miss watching him, but he should be playing on (and getting paid by) a contending team and that ain't the Pens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pensfan71
When we compare it to some of the trades made this week, KD did not do bad at all to be honest. Had we not heard Morrow or Blake's name, some of you wouldn't have acted this way. They're still excellent prospects and all of them are having fantastic seasons

100% agree - one of the best post here since last night.
The problem was this unrealistic dumb rumours about something like Lekkerimäki, Kakko, Morrow, Blake and so on ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Le Magnifique 66
They aren't moving these players.

Dubas thinks Eller, Acciari and Reilly Smith are good. That's why he gave or acquired them with term.

He just traded Jake Guentzel for Bunting with term because he thinks this team can compete.

He acquired prospects that the team thinks can help within the next year or two.

This team isn't selling.
Yeah I’m not sure why people think we’re selling. Dubas wanted to get younger and still compete. It’s a mid flight rebuild that never ends up working but he’s been pretty transparent about it. I would be surprised if that’s not what he says at 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BusinessGoose
I don't agree with the "reality" part. I don't think he's a guy you want on your third pairing as a regular. His ideal role is as the 7th or 8th who can fill in adequately for short periods of time on the third pairing. But if he's your permanent 3rd pairing guy, you've got a shitty third pairing.
Agreed.

Gustafsson/Jones - Rudwedel is a decent third pairing though.
 
I don't want Guentzel back. He's a great player and I'll miss watching him, but he should be playing on (and getting paid by) a contending team and that ain't the Pens.
This could be the one time the Pens actually DON'T keep a guy well past their prime and have to beg someone to take him in three years
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad