I think he’s cooked both physically and mentally.
Laine's one of the best examples of "what could've been" for a hockey player in my time watching the game, imo. Dude has the size and skill to be an absolute juggernaut, but just never had the drive to reach his ceiling and has dealt with injury woes to boot.
I guess if Columbus takes Rakell at full cap hit *and* retains on Laine, it's worth a "who give a shit anymore, what's the worst that could happen" kinda shot. But other than that, nah.
Even if Laine played up to his potential, which I doubt, I still don't really like paying him the ~$9 million AAV he costs.
I'd honestly rather re-sign Guentzel, you know he fits with Crosby and you wouldn't have to spend any assets on him. And I've been vocal about not wanting to re-sign Guentzel.
Even if Laine played up to his potential, which I doubt, I still don't really like paying him the ~$9 million AAV he costs.
I'd honestly rather re-sign Guentzel, you know he fits with Crosby and you wouldn't have to spend any assets on him. And I've been vocal about not wanting to re-sign Guentzel.
Because he's not a 77-82pt winger in reality. He hasn't played a full season of hockey in half a decade. On pace production doesn't carry a lotta weight when a guy's playing 45-60 games a year for years on end. /shrugI'm really confused by this take and I see it a bunch on Laine.
Previous to last year when he was admittedly dealing with some extreme personal issues he had 52 points in 55 games with CBJ and 56 in 56.
Is a 77 - 82 pt winger not someone that we'd find attractive?
Because he's not a 77-82pt winger in reality. He hasn't played a full season of hockey in half a decade. On pace production doesn't carry a lotta weight when a guy's playing 45-60 games a year for years on end. /shrug
He's had a bad back almost his whole career?Not sure I'd consider Laine a "injury prone" player.
Not sure I'd consider Laine a "injury prone" player.
Okay. Agree to disagree I guess.Not sure I'd consider Laine a "injury prone" player.
Laine has only played in 175 of 302 games in the last 4 years.
Even if you ignore last year, he missed 26 and 27 games in the 2 previous years.
He's had a bad back almost his whole career?
And it's not even started yet.Dubois to Kotkaniemi to Nichushkin and now to Skinner. What a summer. What. A. Summer.
Oh wait til July 1st mein Freund.Dubois to Kotkaniemi to Nichushkin and now to Skinner. What a summer. What. A. Summer.
33, 35, 24 goals last 3 seasons. Rebounded rather nicely.I didn't even realize Skinner was still in the league ...
It's not the only reason we have no depth but it's a major factor.I think fretting about the expansion draft decisions made in 2021 in 2024 is just making up excuses for shitty GMing performances.
They have no depth right now due to Hextall and Dubas doing terrible jobs at adding effective bottom-6 players in the last 2 years. Had Dubas and Hextall not done terrible jobs at that, no one would be complaining about the expansion draft.
Anyway, I think their depth is sitting better now than it did a year ago with the breakouts by O’Connor and Puustinen. Their 4th line still needs to be addressed, but a 3rd line of O’Connor-Eller-Puustinen is at least fine, possibly better if O’Connor and Puustinen improve.
What's even more odd to me at times are moves that were made post 17 Cup to the 2020 COVID seasons. Like Skinner was traded to Buffalo in Aug of 2018. That's wild to me. If I had to guess, I would have said like 2015. Something about those years and COVID that just completely warp my NHL timelines.I'm honestly shocked to hear Jeff Skinner is *only* 32.