Sideline
Registered User
- May 23, 2004
- 11,533
- 3,471
I put better odds on Dubas signing Ryan O'Reilly and moving Geno to his wing.I gave up on that. Don't even consider it anymore.
I put better odds on Dubas signing Ryan O'Reilly and moving Geno to his wing.I gave up on that. Don't even consider it anymore.
Vej + Schmaltz for Pickering, P14ering and Granlund would be awesome.Maybe my valuation is way off, but I think you can probably poach a significant couple of players from Arizona and maybe get them to take Granlund.
Keller's off the table because of cost, but Vejmelka, Crouse, and Schmaltz are all guys who could plug into this team as upgrades and shouldn't cost the sun and moon to acquire, I think. Dangle the 14th overall, Pickering and whatever else isn't nailed down and walk away with something like Vejmelka + Schmaltz or Crouse and you've got a really successful start to the off-season I think.
I put better odds on Dubas signing Ryan O'Reilly and moving Geno to his wing.
If he wants and is going to get a 6-7 year term, just no thanks…that’s a killer term for anyone who’s not a Vezina caliber goalie…he should be getting 3-4 years..if they sign him, they also need a 1B goalie when he inevitably loses them leads and games…we can’t be paying him a lot because he’ll need a platoon…I don’t think the Pens’ needs and Jarry’s match up and that’s the problem, even if you can convince yourself he’s a league-average goalie who won’t have injury problems in the future…As unpopular of an opinion as it is among Penguins fans, I have really come around to the idea that the best option with the goalies is to just re-sign Jarry and bring in a big upgrade on DeSmith. Same exact thing the Penguins did in 2012 when they brought in Vokoun to be Fleury's backup after the Flyers series.
It's not that I want to keep Jarry but there really aren't many good options out there right now.
Emp's got the gold medal for mental gymnastics on lockdown. Dude can talk himself into and out of, or vice versa, literally any player/roster scenario.
I wouldn't even give Jarry a one year, prove it deal.
Yeah, I’m over him but some people keep trying to convince themselves he’s the best option…there are way better options, even for a platoon goalie system, than him…I wouldn't even give Jarry a one year, prove it deal.
Well that's on Sullivan as much as Dubas. Look at 2016 vs 2017.
2016 - Sheary-Sid-Horny for the vast majority of the playoffs. Took while to get the lines figured but they were solid from mid-Caps on.
2017 - Sid had a variety of linemates, including Kunitz, Sheary, Rust, Hornqvist, and Guentzel. It was switched up regularly.
Point being, in 2017 Sullivan not had the options for the top line but there was a willingness to change things up when things got stale. That is something we HAVEN'T seen from Sullivan for several years now. Now just how much influence Sid has on that...who knows. There's some no doubt.
So really, it's a three-man operation that needs to get on the same page:
1. Dubas needs to find and provide capable players.
2. Sullivan needs to get back to being willing to change things up.
3. Sid needs to be open to having new linemates even if they don't play 100% the way he wants.
Yeah, I’m over him but some people keep trying to convince themselves he’s the best options…there are way better options, even for a platoon goalie system, than him…
I'm not a change for changes sake kinda guy but I feel like I've seen enough of Jarry to want no part of giving him a big contract.I'm done with Jarry but I still think you guys are fooling yourselves a little in thinking that just swapping out netminders is the silver bullet you're looking for. Have we not learned how team dependent they are? My big issue with Jarry is frankly durability combined with a STILL "incomplete" grade on his post season work. Not because I think he "sucks."
I'm done with Jarry but I still think you guys are fooling yourselves a little in thinking that just swapping out netminders is the silver bullet you're looking for. Have we not learned how team dependent they are? My big issue with Jarry is frankly durability combined with a STILL "incomplete" grade on his post season work. Not because I think he "sucks."
I'm not a change for changes sake kinda guy but I feel like I've seen enough of Jarry to want no part of giving him a big contract.
He was negative 2 in goals saved above expected, which I'd say lines up pretty well with the 909 save %.Yeah you'd think that Jarry would have had a .875 save% last year based on how people talk about him in here. He'd only be acceptable as a 1B making $2 million to $3 million? He had a .909 save% in 47 games last year.
But Price is on LTIRIn a vacuum, Hellebuyck is the best overall choice for us but looking at all goaltender options, it just comes down to price.
True. But we might be able to replicate what Jarry did for less money and term, which might allow us to address holes elsewhere.Absolutely agree.
But I guess I can't help but feel like people are in for some disappointment unless the team changes a LOT about the way they play and how the roster is set up along with the goaltender, himself. I think other netminders could have maybe stolen a few more games last year as Jarry was about as un-clutch as I've ever seen. And hell that would have been the difference between playoffs and no playoffs. But it's still a position that relies a ton on what is going on in front of it.
He was negative 2 in goals saved above expected, which I'd say lines up pretty well with the 909 save %.
It wasn't a bad season, it was just totally mediocre. Not interested in paying out the ass for that and giving huge term.
But Price is on LTIR
I have a bad feeling about Hellebuck.
True. But we might be able to replicate what Jarry did for less money and term, which might allow us to address holes elsewhere.
Is anything out there what Jarry is asking for?True. But we might be able to replicate what Jarry did for less money and term, which might allow us to address holes elsewhere.