KrisLetAngry
MrJukeBoy
The Marleau buyout cost a 1st and that was only for one year of buyout. A team that only wants Granlund for buyout will change a lot.
Yea I see that. Makes it less likely
One thing I will mention is that 1st was expected to be a late 1st with were the Leafs were at.
This is a 14 but then again I am asking for a 3rd line solid player + the 22.
Trading Guentzel now is not a good option. If the Pens trade him away they have to replace his production in a market where there aren't exactly a ton of options available... and they already need to replace Zucker.
The better option is to keep Guentzel and then at the trade deadline, if the Pens are out of it, that's when they can get a pretty good return for him as a rental, and at that point, they don't care about the hole in the lineup. If the Pens aren't out of it at the deadline, then they'll need him to both get in, and win some games if/when they get there.
"Asset Management" isn't a be-all-end-all, after all. The goal is to win games, not offseason report cards.
Agreed we don't trade pending UFA on good deal just because we want assets. I'd rather have the player