I looked at the wrong column. He doesn't have a single power play goal.
So, how is a pass-first player going to help put the puck in the net for this anemic power play? They'll just pass it around the perimeter like they already do.
The guy has two 20 goal seasons in his entire career, is soft as Charmin, and is on the wrong side of 30.
Put him on a good team, he'll slide down the lineup and his production will crater. His only other productive season in the last decade was when he rode Forsberg and Duchene's coattails on a Nashville team that got stomped in the first round.
Mikael Granlund's problem wasn't Mike Sullivan. Granlund's problem was simply being terrible.
He has 31pts on an offensively anemic squad where 10 of them are powerplay assists. The team isn't exactly oozing with potential or talent at the moment, but the draft picks Grier has hoarded will allow him to do so while using Granlund to recoup more picks. 31pts in 42 games is incredible on a team like that.
The thing with Granlund is that he has produced like this before, that's not opinion, it's fact.
The Sharks are the 2nd worst team in the league, their powerplay is 23rd which is actually impressive given the roster they have the moment, there's not a lot to work with for Hertl and Granlund. Good players are still good when they're being used correctly even on poor teams, but good players can struggle on good teams if used incorrectly and that's happened far too many times to be ignorant to it for certain players just because you don't like them.
Meanwhile, the Pens are 30th for the powerplay. I mean, those 10 assists led to 10 goals on the powerplay. That means of the 23 goals the Sharks have scored on the powerplay, he's helped set up 6 of those with primary assists and 4 of them with secondary assists to help create (6 of those being primary assists and he leads the Sharks with powerplay points). Sharks are dead last for Goals For, which makes 100% sense when you look at that roster.
I don't get why you just dislike certain players for no reason, especially since these are players that were misused by Sullivan. It's like on one hand you want to say Sullivan needs to go but then you defend Sullivan inadvertently by trashing players that are directly affected by Sullivan and his misusage of them. Granlund is a good case of that as are other names on the team like Puustinen and even Puljujarvi (as well as Gruden, Hinostroza, etc).