What's funnier is Kingerski's response that I just read, some blokes were mocking him for it too lol.
Read the back and forth by Kingerski and Shirey in the comments lol.
Harkins f***ing sucks, he's playing average hockey for a player of his draft status that they could have just used a lad from wbs for instead.
I still refuse to ever join that cesspool of a site, but lol at other blokes saying what we've been saying to dipshits like Yohe.
Sullivan is the sales guy who sounds great on the phone, knows the product inside and out, and has a good sales approach...but doesn't always close.
Then comes an ultimate discussion point of "when it comes down to it, is he a "good" sales guy or not?" There comes a time when the record IS the indicator. If they are not winning under Sullivan, they need someone new. That doesn't automatically mean that Sullivan is not a good coach. Just like a sales guy - "your sales numbers do not indicate that you are a good sales person".
The response of "well give specific examples while not citing the two biggest, most glaring examples" is such a p***y, cop out response. DK should be embarrassed for that but...we all know. I mean, I could rattle off 10 things that are coaching-related. Whether or not it's Sullivan's direct involvement in a "x's and o's"-like manner is irrelevant at a certain point. You can easily point to something like "Throughout the year, this team has been consistently inconsistent with the effort put forth in the game. Sometimes they play 20min, 40min, 50min, and lose, and sometimes they play 60min and win dominantly." That is absolutely something that is on Sullivan.
Ooof. Oooooooooooooof.
I don't know how anyone is looking at the on-ice product and is happy right now.
