mrcshlbrstrm*
Guest
0-4 after firing Johnston and out scored 15-4.
In fairness, no Fleury and Letang doesn't help.
0-4 after firing Johnston and out scored 15-4.
He wasn't perfect. But he was a good coach.
He was a bad coach. He managed to drag Pittsburgh from top of the tree to a bubble team.
In fairness, no Fleury and Letang doesn't help.
That wasn't his fault. He had to deal with a lot of injuries, player changes, and the NHL changed. Offensive powerhouses aren't working in today's NHL. Dallas is an exception.
He did a good job in managing the cards he was dealt. He was never given a fair chance to prove his worth.
So he had to deal with things that all teams have to deal with? Weak excuses and you know it.
He got given his chance and blew it. Pittsburgh would not have made the play offs with him.
Johnston is still bad.
We might be losing but Johnston was far from good.
He lost three of his last four and we struggled to beat Colorado.
Johnston spent his coaching career coaching an all out offensive system, then all a sudden turns to a conservative for the Pens. Have Pens fans ever wondered why?
Johnston knew his team isn't good enough for the cup, is just a team that could make the playoffs. Johnston coached a system that has a high chance of the Pens sneaking into the playoffs. Obviously, he would turn to whoever played consistently which would be veteran players. That doesn't mean he prefers them.
Also, why would a coach focusing solely on just making the playoffs, take a risk with Sprong who could potentially lose him a game or 2? Rutherford pushing him made no sense. Both were in it only for this season, why would Johnston care what happens with Sprong? Why would Rutherford interfere with Johnstons strategy to make the playoffs?
Firing Johnston was a mistake, in fact, hiring was even a bigger mistake. Rutherford is an idiot thinking that the Pens needed an offensive coach with the roster they have, Johnston had his hands tied as his preferred system would obviously not work. I couldn't care less about Johnston, but the Pens fans ragging on him should be putting down Rutherford instead
That's BS and you know it. Penguins would get in as a wildcard at the worst.
Last year, they had a bad injury situation and still made the playoffs and were competitive.
Johnston spent his coaching career coaching an all out offensive system, then all a sudden turns to a conservative for the Pens. Have Pens fans ever wondered why?
Johnston knew his team isn't good enough for the cup, is just a team that could make the playoffs. Johnston coached a system that has a high chance of the Pens sneaking into the playoffs. Obviously, he would turn to whoever played consistently which would be veteran players. That doesn't mean he prefers them.
Also, why would a coach focusing solely on just making the playoffs, take a risk with Sprong who could potentially lose him a game or 2? Rutherford pushing him made no sense. Both were in it only for this season, why would Johnston care what happens with Sprong? Why would Rutherford interfere with Johnstons strategy to make the playoffs?
Firing Johnston was a mistake, in fact, hiring was even a bigger mistake. Rutherford is an idiot thinking that the Pens needed an offensive coach with the roster they have, Johnston had his hands tied as his preferred system would obviously not work. I couldn't care less about Johnston, but the Pens fans ragging on him should be putting down Rutherford instead
That wasn't his fault. He had to deal with a lot of injuries, player changes, and the NHL changed. Offensive powerhouses aren't working in today's NHL. Dallas is an exception.
He did a good job in managing the cards he was dealt. He was never given a fair chance to prove his worth.
None of the questions you raised are valid reasons for the precipitous fall in virtually every major category for the Pens. Mumps recovery doesn't take that long, Letang played his best hockey last year after the stroke, and Kunitz is too old to be an effective piece, but Johnston plays him all the time anyway.
League scoring doesn't affect the Pens relative lack of scoring either. The problem isn't that the Pens are scoring fewer goals, it's that they're scoring many fewer goals relative to other teams. 5th in scoring is 5th in scoring and 27th in scoring is 27th in scoring no matter how many goals are being scored overall.
The Penguins only just managed to sneak in last year with him and were trending downwards, WITHOUT INJURIES, this year.
Why didn't Rutherford hire Boucher?
Remember when Mike Yeo coached the Pens PP? It sucked so they fired him. Now Yeo is doing great as the Minnesota head coach and the Pens PP still sucks.
The Pens PP sucking is on the players. It's not like there's a huge variety of tactics involved in the PP anyway. There's pretty much only two formations being used by NHL teams. It's all about execution.
And the coach is responsible for that. The PP coach is responsible for who plays where on the PP, and for correcting execution mistakes. If the players aren't executing, it's his fault.
They have a worse PP than the Maple Leafs, a team that has no offensive talent. That's on the coaching.
The Pens hired Jim Rutherford as GM. How any team found him fit to manage an NHL team is beyond me. One Stanley Cup season and a bunch of playoff seasons in the cupcake Southeast Division. Hey, Don Waddell is now working for the 'Canes. Maybe they can pry him loose from Carolina in the off-season.
The Pens hired Jim Rutherford as GM. How any team found him fit to manage an NHL team is beyond me. One Stanley Cup season and a bunch of playoff seasons in the cupcake Southeast Division. Hey, Don Waddell is now working for the 'Canes. Maybe they can pry him loose from Carolina in the off-season.
Why didn't Rutherford hire Boucher? Any hockey fan knows this would have been the perfect fit for Pitts. There's a lot of bad coaches I would hire before even thinking about Mike Sullivan. Just an awful hire that was likely due to the old boys club mentality.