No doubt you see Matt Murray and Samsonov as 2a and 2B goalies. Right? Maybe 3AB.Yeah, I don't see that happening
They only need to wait at the end of the season and put him under contract.This is assuming Kane is requesting to go home to Buffalo and the Sabres are somewhat in the playoff hunt in February. Sabres could just wait to sign him next summer but it could be a trade similar to Taylor Hall where the Sabres got a 2nd, Bjork and Lazar. Chicago doesn't want him to walk for nothing. Buffalo does have three 2nd round picks in 2023 and also have the rights to Portillo and Ryan Johnson which could all be included in a package. What is realistic at the deadline under this scenario.
No doubt you see Matt Murray and Samsonov as 2a and 2B goalies. Right? Maybe 3AB.
Makes absolutely no sense for the Sabres to give up much needed Picks/Prospects during a time where they still won't be making the Playoffs.
Kane could legitimately choose to sign there in the Offseason. No reason to give up Futures for him when you can simply wait for Free Agency.
In a season where the Sabres won’t be contending for the cup, it makes no sense to shed sssets at trade deadline to obtain a expiring contract. The gm of the Sabres has said that they will not be squiring Kane this year.To play devil's advocate the team with by far the deepest prospect pipeline doesnt have a "much needed picks/prospects" problem. If anything they have a top tier talent deficiency with incredible young depth behind.
While I completely agree it makes no sense to bleed assets for Kane when you can take your shot in free agency instead I just took exception to saying the Sabres have any remote need for prospects or picks. If anything they should be looking to trade some of them to bolster their lineup. Kane just isn't wise if you think you can get him in free agency for nothing...
ok...thanks for kinda saying what I said....In a season where the Sabres won’t be contending for the cup, it makes no sense to shed sssets at trade deadline to obtain a expiring contract. The gm of the Sabres has said that they will not be squiring Kane this year.
Sorry I got confused by your reply of “ Sabres have any remote need for prospects or picks. If anything they should be looking to trade some of them to bolster their lineup” I read it as you were saying they should trade away their prospects to get players now. The Botiril plan.ok...thanks for kinda saying what I said....
Oilers would offer their first + Puljujarvi + Foegele for cap reason + prospect .Even if he controls the situation its not going to force Chicago to settle for 2nds and meh prospects. If Jarmo can get 1sts for Foligno and Savard I think its safe to assume Chicago can manage a 1st + for Kane, especially with retention.
A GM doesn't tank for a prospect . When they do like Buffalo and Arizona did for McDavid the odds are against them getting the prospect and the odds of them lasting long as a GM is very short.Awww, just because the Sabres are building a better pool of prospects and are further ahead than Detroit doesn’t need you to be so salty. It’s a shame Yzerman added vets to ruin a perfect opportunity to grab Bedard. So short sighted.
Murray?Sorry I got confused by your reply of “ Sabres have any remote need for prospects or picks. If anything they should be looking to trade some of them to bolster their lineup” I read it as you were saying they should trade away their prospects to get players now. The Botiril plan.
For starters, the Sabres do not need to finish top 3. They need to finish 8th to make the playoffs. It's a long shot but Leafs goaltending is a major long shot too and pencilling them in for the exact same offence. We shall see. Matthews is 50-60 goals but they might lose some production aside from their top two lines.I don't trust the Leafs goaltending at all. difference is I know that the Leafs can outscore their goaltending issues.
I know that because despite having arguably the NHL's worst goaltending after November they won 54 games, they won those games because they had the #2 offense in the NHL behind only Florida.
Buffalo doesn't have the offense to do that they can't outscore their goaltending issues.
For starters, the Sabres do not need to finish top 3. They need to finish 8th to make the playoffs. It's a long shot but Leafs goaltending is a major long shot too and pencilling them in for the exact same offence. We shall see. Matthews is 50-60 goals but they might lose some production aside from their top two lines.
That’s very possible.Kane finishes the year in Chicago.
I doubt it. Makes no sense for him or the team.Kane finishes the year in Chicago.
This is assuming Kane is requesting to go home to Buffalo and the Sabres are somewhat in the playoff hunt in February. Sabres could just wait to sign him next summer but it could be a trade similar to Taylor Hall where the Sabres got a 2nd, Bjork and Lazar. Chicago doesn't want him to walk for nothing. Buffalo does have three 2nd round picks in 2023 and also have the rights to Portillo and Ryan Johnson which could all be included in a package. What is realistic at the deadline under this scenario.
but in a divsion with Toronto, Tampa, Florida, Boston, and a vastly improved Ottawa and Detroit they aren't likely finishing top 8.
even if they did finish 5th in the Atlantic which is the minimum required are they better than the Rangers?, Canes? Pens?, Caps? probably not.
are they better than the NYI? I'm not sure they got killed by covid and a 13 game road trip to start the year but prior to that they had been to the conference finals twice so they get the benifit of the doubt.
to me there are at least 10 teams better than them in the east and that doesn't include the NYI who are a question mark
YUp. CO makes sense to me. Wins another Cup, then is on the market as a UFA as a 4 time Cup winner. Then, he MIGHT take a look at BUF, but I wouldn't bet on it. He will want a bigger contract than Skinner's, and sooner or later the Sabres will have to be paying their young talent. Giving a pricey retirement contract to an older player who has nothing left to prove wouldn't be good for the team, IMO.I doubt it. Makes no sense for him or the team.
Giving a pricey retirement contract to an older player who has nothing left to prove wouldn't be good for the team, IMO.
He may want that, but is any team giving him $73M at age 34 turning 35 shortly after the season starts?He will want a bigger contract than Skinner's, and sooner or later the Sabres will have to be paying their young talent.
More than $9 M for Kane at his age. I'll take some of what you are having.YUp. CO makes sense to me. Wins another Cup, then is on the market as a UFA as a 4 time Cup winner. Then, he MIGHT take a look at BUF, but I wouldn't bet on it. He will want a bigger contract than Skinner's, and sooner or later the Sabres will have to be paying their young talent. Giving a pricey retirement contract to an older player who has nothing left to prove wouldn't be good for the team, IMO.
CHI will want as much as they can get in any deal, but i wonder if they might do Kane a solid by accepting less from a contender like CO - maybe a team in the East would be an easier sell, but i can't think of any team out there that is a sure thing the way that CO is this year.