Blender
Registered User
- Dec 2, 2009
- 53,301
- 47,196
Well, apparently there is. My point is, there was no point in that, Nashville HAD to get rid of Subban, and there were few potential suitors for two reasons:
1) Only a few teams can absorb Subban's $9M per for 3 seasons
2) Some believe P.K. Subban is not P.K. Subban anymore
Point being, I highly doubt Nashville walks if you give them #55 instead of #34. Just an unnecessary addition of a more valuable asset. At #34 you're still in the "almost sure thing NHL players" in this draft, whereas in the #50'ish area there's more doubt. Which is precisely why you're seeing numerous trades down into the #30s right now.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/264f1/264f18a7c583912652a89549c610c556c8687e42" alt="giphy.gif"
34 is not a sure thing NHLer, every draft pick analysis ever done refutes that.