I always find it amusing when people compare resumes by what they collected and their trophy hardware. Some extremely amazing players could have had more trophies had they not been playing in the same era as Wayne and Mario. Guys like Ovie would not have won what they did had he been playing in that era. So dont compare him in a way that doesnt make sense when discussing players from the past. Has Ovie been dominating other players of his era in points year by year? Yeah he scores lots of goals, he is perhaps one of the best ever in that category no doubt, but the true greats are getting you 40 goals a year with at least 60 assists.
I'm sorry but when you've got like 17 assists so far right now, and you accumulate about 30 to 35 in a season, it doesnt strike me as a complete offensive player.
Jagr was a beast because not only could he do it all himself, but he made his linemates like Hridna and Straka dangerous. Jags was collecting 123 points at the age of like 35.
Gotta be more than one dimensional.
Except that whole illusion that players suffered due to Gretzky and Lemieux being in the league has been an excuse used far to many times. I mean, what players are tot referring to that would have won more if not for those guys? Because that can spread out to dozens of players regardless, there is no telling specific players who were victims of it. Also, you then stated how Ovechkin wouldn’t be winning anything if playing in an era with Gretzky and Lemieux....ok? And? No one would most likely, even Crosby. But facts are that Ovechkins goal scoring for this era is incredibly dominant and consistent when looking at different eras.
there you go with these sudden standards. True all time greats? There is no standard, your just making one right now in order to put his goal scoring on the back burner, which is pretty disrespectful given how prolific is goal scoring is. When your considered THE best of all time, or at least one, you don’t just get to have that ignored for a second and go...”Ya that’s nice and all but his assists aren’t impressive at all, so by that logic, his offense isn’t all that impressive either.”
I mean sure he isn’t the most well rounded offensive player, doesn’t mean he isn’t one of the best of all time. Scoring goals is the most valuable part of offense. You don’t stack up assists unless the guy your passing to scores, right? And when your dominating goal scoring like he has, you definitely get to be in the conversation.
Again, it’s not one dimensional when your helping your line mates gather assists by scoring a lot of goals. It goes both ways. Ovechkin has already showed he can score without Ovechkin, Kuzy, or Carlson. But have they shown they can score without Ovi? Don’t you think having the best goal scorer on your line, as a center, is beneficial to your stats and play?
Also Ovechkin has 8 top 10 point finishes and a scoring title. His goal scoring may be a majority of his offense, but that doesn’t mean his lack of assists mean he’s less offensively dangerous.
seriously. There’s a freaking award for goal scoring, not who has the most assists, and Ovechkin has won it more times than any player, including Lemieux and Gretzky. Why assists are suddenly being used as a measurement of who is and isn’t good offensively only shows how many are so eager to discredit Ovi by moving goal posts and changing the entirety of what is and isn’t valuable. Last time I checked, Goals win games. The guy with 50-60 assists doesn’t have any without the guy pulling the trigger. One clearly depends more on the other.