A goal can exist without an assist but an assist can't exist without a goal. So why should 2 assists be equal to a goal? I don't think even, "subjective" covers it.
I get that, but sort of weird way to argue it. Of course a goal can happen without an assist and an assist can't happen without a goal....but that doesn't mean a goal should be worth more or is all the work, etc....puck just happens to go across the line.
Goals without assists happen in 3 different ways: 1) the other team shoots it in their own net (not sure if that means the player on my team that last touched the puck did something great to score the goal), 2) the other team made a terrible pass right on to the stick of my teammate, who shot it in the wide open net or 3) player picks up the puck from the other team and then proceeds to do all the work himself and score the goal.
You want to start arguing goals should be worth more than assists, might as well start arguing some goals should be worth more than others as well. Generally speaking, the logic that was derived for 2 assists is that is takes those last 2 plays to set up a goal, so it's all connected. Of course there will be times where the 2nd assist really didn't do anything but touch the puck, sometimes by accident, but you have the same thing where a guy scores a goal after the puck going off his leg and not even knowing it. More often than not, the goal is never scored without the work being done by the players that's getting the assists.