hak
Registered User
- Jan 4, 2008
- 114
- 48
Congrats ovie. I am so happy I got to witness his career
I just dont think he is the best i think hes up thereI feel like if you have the career all time numbers than you check all the boxes.
You don't get to that level by not being among the best. And longevity should absolutely be a factor. Just because of all the what if's a major one is also "Well what if their scoring fell off later on in their career and all those per game numbers massively dip?"
Ovi’s goals last night should not have counted as they were scored with goaltenders in the net.
Bobby Hull, played in a low scoring era, wood sticks, no curves for part of career, 72 game seasons, first player with multiple 50 goal seasons.I mean I have lost I don't think Ovie is the greatest goal scorer of all time
I think he's up there
And I don't think I can lose by having an opinion
If we go by goals per game he's 7th all time
there is lots of ways I can skiew an argument in my favor.
I out him in my top 5 of
Mike Bossy
Wayne Gretzky
Mario Lemieux
Ovie
Rocket Richard
There is more to things than longevity
He is in elite conversation I dont feel the need to label him as the best
I just dont think he is the best i think hes up there
I think hes top 3 for sure
but id still take mario or gretzky over him
Certainly. Key among them is how you play relative to your peers. Ie leading the league in goal scoring more often than anyone else. His 9x stands out among your top 5 which doesn't even include #2 in that stat (Bobby Hull).I mean I have lost I don't think Ovie is the greatest goal scorer of all time
I think he's up there
And I don't think I can lose by having an opinion
If we go by goals per game he's 7th all time
there is lots of ways I can skiew an argument in my favor.
I out him in my top 5 of
Mike Bossy
Wayne Gretzky
Mario Lemieux
Ovie
Rocket Richard
There is more to things than longevity
He is in elite conversation I dont feel the need to label him as the best
I think he's been the best for a while, when you adjust for era. As good as Gretzky was, he played at a time when scoring was the highest in NHL history. OV, on the other hand, played a good chunk of his prime throughout the DPE 2.0. If you era-adjust Howe's goals, he's close – but in 450+ more games.I think it's time to call Ovy the best goal-scorer of all time, honestly. I think it's getting harder and harder to argue against it, especially considering how he is doing it across different eras.
Because i wouldnt put Hull in my top 5, hes top 10 for meCertainly. Key among them is how you play relative to your peers. Ie leading the league in goal scoring more often than anyone else. His 9x stands out among your top 5 which doesn't even include #2 in that stat (Bobby Hull).
No. Brett will say the same.Because i wouldnt put Hull in my top 5, hes top 10 for me
but his son was better
I need to a top ten list
Not reallyI think he's been the best for a while, when you adjust for era. As good as Gretzky was, he played at a time when scoring was the highest in NHL history. OV, on the other hand, played a good chunk of his prime throughout the DPE 2.0. If you era-adjust Howe's goals, he's close – but in 450+ more games.
At this point, OV is the undisputed best by a decent margin.
exactly. Gretzky was the best player in the NHL for how many seasons? OV was the best for what 1 maybe 2 seasons?But he didnt dominate his era like gretzky did
Who knows.I don't think he's going after 1000.
I'd be totally shocked if he played beyond his current deal which ends after his age 40 season.
exactly. Gretzky was the best player in the NHL for how many seasons? OV was the best for what 1 maybe 2 seasons?
No, people don't pull out the "adjust by era shit" to make someone look better. It's because scoring is drastically different between eras and it is only logical to compensate for those differences. Unless you're one of those people who thinks Bernie Nicholls is better than Crosby or McDavid because he scored more points than either while playing in the Fantasyland 1980s?Not really
I gate when people pull the adjusted by era shit to make someone look better
What he did is amazing
But he didnt dominate his era like gretzky did
He dominated goal scoring for a far longer time than Gretzky. If he scores 40 this year, that's another longevity record he will hold. Same with 50.Not really
I gate when people pull the adjusted by era shit to make someone look better
What he did is amazing
But he didnt dominate his era like gretzky did
Is it better to attempt to adjust for differences in era or pretend that a sport hasn't changed in 40 years?Not really
I gate when people pull the adjusted by era shit to make someone look better
What he did is amazing
But he didnt dominate his era like gretzky did
1000 would mean averaging over 50 goals for the next 3 seasons. It is not happening and if it does, Ovechkin will have to be like -100 in order to get enough chances.Who knows.
1000 will be very very tempting if it's possible.
Three seasons.
But I don't even know why you're bringing it up. No shit Gretzky is better than Ovie.
If it wasn't for Covid and the lockout he'd break Wayne's record this season.It mentions shortened seasons (12-13 lockout, 19-20/20-21 Covid seasons) but something often forgotten is that Ovechkin missed the entirety of the 04-05 season.
There's no telling what he would have done that year, but given that he scored 50+ the following season it's probably fair to say his floor was 30-35.
That same guy accused Ovechkin of juicing.Bahahaha
How many of these guys score 50 in today's game?:Is it better to attempt to adjust for differences in era or pretend that a sport hasn't changed in 40 years?
Look at the goalies a guy like Bossy was shooting against:
View attachment 621537