Is size really the only attribute that some HF posters are after? I have yet to read anyone fitting that very narrow characterization you have brought up in several posts now.
What is wrong with valuing size where the choice is between two players with similar profiles within the same tier, for instance? Should they disregard the “moar size” guy and opt for the 5’9 guy instead?
There is a reason that the “moar size” label is “silly and misguided” — it absolutely is cause no one fits that description.
Once again, size is just one attribute among others that teams are mindful of when roster building, to optimize their asset mix. No one is advocating choosing size as the principal determining factor or to disregard or downplay skill. I’m at a loss.