GMs have to trust the scouts, who in turn have to look for players who fit the coach's system. Up to the GM to allocate the cap dollars and make it work. Going to have to be good at that with $35 then $53 mill in dead cap coming up in 2024 and 2025.So if there has to be blame here, its probably on the sale of the new team. Paton may still get sent off for the whole ordeal because he wasn't the guy ownership put in place. He's got pretty clearly defined roles and works at the suggestions of the coach and the owner to a great degree I have to assume. He has made some other mistakes along the way of course, no one is perfect. I doubt a new GM is going to add value to the team but GMs don't exactly win games on the field either.
Americans don’t have culture
Americans:
They dressed 13 players for the game and all 13 recorded at least 2 points and 1 rebound.Nuggets farded and shidded all over the grizzlies
Herchel walker trade still. It wasn’t a horrible trade(Wilson)as far as cost to acquire. What’s frustrating is giving him that contract and the front office even thinking he was even remotely still a viable option. The minute I heard Russel Wilson was a possibility I started talking shit. I never liked Wilson, dating to the draftHas to be. I can’t think of anything that even comes close off the top of my head. I mean realistically its up there for worst trades in the history of the sport.
Good points here, unclear to me how much credit back to the Broncos they get if Russ signs everyone.GMs have to trust the scouts, who in turn have to look for players who fit the coach's system. Up to the GM to allocate the cap dollars and make it work. Going to have to be good at that with $35 then $53 mill in dead cap coming up in 2024 and 2025.
Russ had a NTC coming from Seattle, so part of waiving the NTC was basically a handshake agreement to sign a new deal before taking the field in 2022.
Realistically, Broncos have to look at players who will be on the roster in 2026 and beyond. Anyone who won't be with the team at that point in time needs to be considered trade bait, especially if they can save some cap space over the next couple of seasons.
There is offset language in Russ's contract but realistically, he's either getting a 7 figure 1 year deal like Baker did with TB, or he's on the couch waiting for a call as I don't see him signing on to be a #2. At worst, he's going to go in and compete for the starting job like Baker did. Wentz didn't get into a camp. At best you save a few to several million of the dead cap for 2025 if he gets a Baker type 1 year deal for $8 mill or so.
Would Tanny and Jimmy G as well, go in as a backup or are they starters only at this point in time? Depends on their ego. Flacco hasn't been the starter since early in Jackson's career, and Lamar is in year 6 of his career.
I assume Jokic did not return after exiting in the third quarter, so his shooting percentage was 100%!!!They dressed 13 players for the game and all 13 recorded at least 2 points and 1 rebound.
It's about as bad value wise as trading up for a bust QB in the draft. The Contract is the kicker here.Herchel walker trade still. It wasn’t a horrible trade(Wilson)as far as cost to acquire. What’s frustrating is giving him that contract and the front office even thinking he was even remotely still a viable option. The minute I heard Russel Wilson was a possibility I started talking shit. I never liked Wilson, dating to the draft
How does it work in the NFL? If a team picks him up are the Broncos still on the book?
If im ownership, Paton has to go, he’s been worse the the mcd debacle if that can be believedIt's about as bad value wise as trading up for a bust QB in the draft. The Contract is the kicker here.
But yeah, nothing will top Walker.
Dude brought back Melvin Gordon. Should’ve been fired a LONG time ago.If im ownership, Paton has to go, he’s been worse the the mcd debacle if that can be believed
In the most simpliest terms, all of the actual cash a team pays a player, will ultimately have to hit their salary cap. Unlike the NHL, where front loaded contracts, can be traded and the acquiring can pay a lower salary than the cap hit. NFL, cap charges are based on who has PAID the player. Which is why players who are within the first 2 years of a long term contract will leave behind large dead cap charges, even if they have no more guaranteed money.Unless it’s changed, only the signing bonus is guaranteed. So they wouldn’t owe him for the remaining salary portion of the contract.
But then you have the allocation of the signing bonus for cap purposes, which is spread out evenly over each year if the deal. But when someone is waived, the remaining part of the signing bonus goes to the year he’s waived. Again, this is unless it has changed recently.
Not saying it’s right or was the smart thing to do, but I’m sure Paton wasn’t going to move all that for a guy he wasn’t going to commit to long term. I’m sure we’d all be losing our mind trading all that capital for a guy we lost after 1 season. Just an absolute disaster all around.My biggest gripe with the trade is wiping out your draft capital AND your salary cap before the dude plays one down. If it was just one or the other I could understand things but they basically froze ALL of their player personnel assets for 2-3 years on this guy…….before he even took a snap. Paton kind of dug his own damn hole in that regard.
Interesting that the HC is bring given the power to fire the GM. I hope he boots the mother f***er to the moon.Adam Schefter: Fate of George Paton lies in Sean Payton's hands
"How does Sean feel about moving forward with George Paton? That's going to be a Sean decision, just like the Russell thing," Schefter saiddenversports.com
I thought Russ was signed for 2 years. There was a quote going around at the time that Russ was content just playing the final two years of that contract as it was. And I can’t find it online anymore but I read something last year that Greg (Penner) called up Paton and initiated the idea of extending Russ. I kinda fault Penner for the extension but Paton should have pushed back until Wilson had at least played. Instead I think Paton played the simple yes man.I’m sure we’d all be losing our mind trading all that capital for a guy we lost after 1 season. Just an absolute disaster all around.
Oh was it 2? I thought it was 1 for some reason. Certainly makes the contract decision that much worse imo.I thought Russ was signed for 2 years. There was a quote going around at the time that Russ was content just playing the final two years of that contract as it was. And I can’t find it online anymore but I read something last year that Greg (Penner) called up Paton and initiated the idea of extending Russ. I kinda fault Penner for the extension but Paton should have pushed back until Wilson had at least played. Instead I think Paton played the simple yes man.
Yeah I guess it was 2. Looked it up in this god awful article. Russell Wilson is such a chump - the team and Wilson mutually agreed on a Sept 1 deadline for his extension which was like 2 weeks before he would have to play his first game. This article has aged like goat cheese - explaining the “flexibility” in the deal lmao. How Russell Wilson's new Broncos contract came together in just 3 weeksOh was it 2? I thought it was 1 for some reason. Certainly makes the contract decision that much worse imo.
Interesting that the HC is bring given the power to fire the GM. I hope he boots the mother f***er to the moon.
It's also pretty funny seeing all the ex-players simping so hard for Wilson on Twitter. We need that POS gone ASAP.