OT: Other Sports 82

Status
Not open for further replies.

ChiHawks10

Registered User
Jul 7, 2009
28,801
22,743
Chicago 'Burbs
Agreed to disagreed.
Why? When it's beautiful and the weather is nice, the roof is open. When the weather sucks, the roof is closed. No rain delays. No rainouts. No going to see baseball outside when it's 35 degrees in April or October. Not to mention it brings in all kinds of revenue from concerts and festivals and such. There are really no negatives to it. Especially somewhere like Chicago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pez68 and Mrfenn92

ChiHawks10

Registered User
Jul 7, 2009
28,801
22,743
Chicago 'Burbs
Yeah, you're talking like an additional 300-500m for a retractable roof. I just think it makes sense somewhere like Chicago. If you're building a billion dollar+ stadium, wtf does it matter if you spend another 400m? :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pez68 and Mrfenn92

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
191,242
23,903
Chicagoland
Yeah, you're talking like an additional 300-500m for a retractable roof. I just think it makes sense somewhere like Chicago. If you're building a billion dollar+ stadium, wtf does it matter if you spend another 400m? :laugh:

Also increases options for concerts and other events to be held there in offseason

But still $300-500M would take a lot of concerts/etc to justify + Would go against venues like UC, Rosemont Horizon (Whatever that is called now) and others
 

BRayne

Registered User
May 5, 2011
283
152
Yeah, I'd hope that they'd tell him to suck a lemon and at most offer to build a red line stop for there or something. But they'll find a few hundred million to toss at the billionaire.

Best case scenario is that Jerry splits the funding with Related and they draw up a contract that includes the option of full stadium ownership for the purchaser when the kids sell the team after he dies.
 

Sarava

Registered User
May 9, 2010
17,283
2,878
West Dundee, IL
Also increases options for concerts and other events to be held there in offseason

But still $300-500M would take a lot of concerts/etc to justify + Would go against venues like UC, Rosemont Horizon (Whatever that is called now) and others
You also would need to see what the Bears do first. If the Sox put a retractable roof on a new stadium, and the Bears build a giant dome in Arlington Heights - I would imagine most concerts would go to the Bears dome. Also upkeep and maintenance costs that would be pretty massive for a retractable roof.

I'm a little out of the loop with this south loop stadium thing...been busy at work this week. I hope Jerry doesn't think the Illinois taxpayers will pay for this again?

And I wonder how will parking and traffic might be for people like myself coming from the burbs.
 

HeisenBaez

Registered User
Nov 3, 2008
3,457
1,550
Heart of Dixie
Why? When it's beautiful and the weather is nice, the roof is open. When the weather sucks, the roof is closed. No rain delays. No rainouts. No going to see baseball outside when it's 35 degrees in April or October. Not to mention it brings in all kinds of revenue from concerts and festivals and such. There are really no negatives to it. Especially somewhere like Chicago.
Football (and to a certain degree hockey) to me is always better in the elements. I know the NFL will never do it but I rather see the Super Bowl played in the cold and not the warm.
 

ChiHawks10

Registered User
Jul 7, 2009
28,801
22,743
Chicago 'Burbs
Replace football with baseball and my point still stands. I like the element being part of the game.

Who likes watching baseball when it's 35 or 40 degrees, sleeting, snowing, raining, etc? Baseball is a warm weather sport. Always has been. Playing it in those conditions is a disadvantage to those teams, as well as miserable for the fans. I literally don't even think of attending a Sox game until mid May at the earliest, and I really don't wanna go to a game past mid September. IDK if I'd even want to go to a cold ass October night playoff game at this point.
 

Space umpire

Registered User
Nov 15, 2018
3,263
2,656
Cocoa Beach, Florida
Replace football with baseball and my point still stands. I like the element being part of the game.
They are and should continue to be part of the game. Maybe asterisks since the games are now vanilla.
Much easier to pass a football in generic conditions.
Ball doesn’t sting off the bat in generic conditions.

All because p***y fans don’t want to sit in imperfect weather.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad