Pretty sure there's also a water taxi stop at Ping Park or whatever that park is in Chinatown nearby. Or at least there used to be.The Roosevelt stop is 2 blocks away.
Really no reason that every modern to not be a retractable dome
Why? When it's beautiful and the weather is nice, the roof is open. When the weather sucks, the roof is closed. No rain delays. No rainouts. No going to see baseball outside when it's 35 degrees in April or October. Not to mention it brings in all kinds of revenue from concerts and festivals and such. There are really no negatives to it. Especially somewhere like Chicago.Agreed to disagreed.
It's way more than that. Roofs are the most expensive thing about a stadium. You never really pay for it, it doesn't add the long term value that people think it does.Yeah another hundred million is nothing
UnderstoodIt's way more than that. Roofs are the most expensive thing about a stadium. You never really pay for it, it doesn't add the long term value that people think it does.
Yeah, you're talking like an additional 300-500m for a retractable roof. I just think it makes sense somewhere like Chicago. If you're building a billion dollar+ stadium, wtf does it matter if you spend another 400m?
All State Arena.Also increases options for concerts and other events to be held there in offseason
But still $300-500M would take a lot of concerts/etc to justify + Would go against venues like UC, Rosemont Horizon (Whatever that is called now) and others
Bruh, I have like 10 months left until 40.I would definitely appreciate it, I'll be in my 40s by the time this thing gets built
Yeah, I'd hope that they'd tell him to suck a lemon and at most offer to build a red line stop for there or something. But they'll find a few hundred million to toss at the billionaire.
You also would need to see what the Bears do first. If the Sox put a retractable roof on a new stadium, and the Bears build a giant dome in Arlington Heights - I would imagine most concerts would go to the Bears dome. Also upkeep and maintenance costs that would be pretty massive for a retractable roof.Also increases options for concerts and other events to be held there in offseason
But still $300-500M would take a lot of concerts/etc to justify + Would go against venues like UC, Rosemont Horizon (Whatever that is called now) and others
Football (and to a certain degree hockey) to me is always better in the elements. I know the NFL will never do it but I rather see the Super Bowl played in the cold and not the warm.Why? When it's beautiful and the weather is nice, the roof is open. When the weather sucks, the roof is closed. No rain delays. No rainouts. No going to see baseball outside when it's 35 degrees in April or October. Not to mention it brings in all kinds of revenue from concerts and festivals and such. There are really no negatives to it. Especially somewhere like Chicago.
Football (and to a certain degree hockey) to me is always better in the elements. I know the NFL will never do it but I rather see the Super Bowl played in the cold and not the warm.
Replace football with baseball and my point still stands. I like the element being part of the game.We're talking about a baseball stadium. Not a football stadium.
Replace football with baseball and my point still stands. I like the element being part of the game.
I agree.Football (and to a certain degree hockey) to me is always better in the elements. I know the NFL will never do it but I rather see the Super Bowl played in the cold and not the warm.
They are and should continue to be part of the game. Maybe asterisks since the games are now vanilla.Replace football with baseball and my point still stands. I like the element being part of the game.