myleafs
Registered User
- May 25, 2021
- 2,425
- 2,659
and if that 4 are all soft passive forwardsYes.
And especially true if half of that four disappear when the going gets tough.
and if that 4 are all soft passive forwardsYes.
And especially true if half of that four disappear when the going gets tough.
A goalie, dman, centerman, winger instead of 2 wingers and 2 centres seems a better way to spend $ and to balance a roster.Ehh. Florida is paying nearly as much for Bob, Tkachuk, Barkov, and Ekblad .. and no one seems to be making an issue of that. But that's because Bob and Tkachuk are playing like they're being paid right now in the playoffs.
Had any of the core players have done that in their playoff performances, there would be more success that followed.
Problem is the Leafs hitched their wagon to the wrong core players .. and Dubas' continually gambling on them was his downfall.
Well I agree but the post I was quoting inferred you can’t tie your cap up in 4 players.. which isn’t always true as long as they are the right players
I am pretty sure Kyle just got mugged by the agents for the Big 3. I don't know that JT was even a factor. Willie was looking at Drai, Mitch was dreaming of AM money because he was outscoring him, and AM was looking at McDavid. A new GM with zero experience at high end contracts is fresh meat to them. He wants to be friends with his boys, make them part of the Leaf family' and the agents just want to bleed him white. Having a good relationship with the player doesn't help much when they pretend its their agent doing the squeeze and not them.I see a lot of off ramps from where we could have ended up somewhere different but obviously not A, B, C action plan without knowing what was available to Toronto.
Tavares is definitely the Big One. If he hadn't signed at $11 million per season, maybe the Big 3 contracts wouldn't have escalated the way they did. You could have saved $3 million on Matthews and Marner combined, so $14 million in roster flexibility between 2018 and now.
Second is they should have been more proactive in moving UFAs like Gardiner and Andersen. It was a very passive "own rental" policy instead of looking around at the league and plugging in alternatives before your guys left for nothing.
The Kadri deal to Colorado was obviously awful.
And then just all the little heads up moves other teams made during this era that Toronto could have plausibly done if they had the cap flexibility. Trading 2 2nd's for Devon Toews, re-signing Verhaeghe instead of passing over a few hundred k. Maybe let time run out on Marleau, and still have the Jarvis pick. It all adds up to a healthier franchise with more depth.
Agreed.A goalie, dman, centerman, winger instead of 2 wingers and 2 centres seems a better way to spend $ and to balance a roster.
You would have thought with Dubas being such a supposedly “nice guy” that perhaps they might have taken a home town discount.I am pretty sure Kyle just got mugged by the agents for the Big 3. I don't know that JT was even a factor. Willie was looking at Drai, Mitch was dreaming of AM money because he was outscoring him, and AM was looking at McDavid. A new GM with zero experience at high end contracts is fresh meat to them. He wants to be friends with his boys, make them part of the Leaf family' and the agents just want to bleed him white. Having a good relationship with the player doesn't help much when they pretend its their agent doing the squeeze and not them.
It looks like Dubas took the high road on an official basis and then got some of his friends in the media to sling the mud for him. Don’t know that for a fact, but it kinda smells that way.They were probably being greased behind the scenes. I don't know for a fact but it sure seems like there was shady business going on and it was larger in scope then has been suggested thus far.
Agreed.
And they’re going to the finals.
You would have thought with Dubas being such a supposedly “nice guy” that perhaps they might have taken a home town discount.
Guess it doesn’t work that way, of at least didn’t here.
It looks like Dubas took the high road on an official basis and then got some of his friends in the media to sling the mud for him. Don’t know that for a fact, but it kinda smells that way.
Teams looking at him, should take note of the damage he is doing to an organization that gave him his start in the NHL as he’s heading out the door.
These guys were kids, being led by their parents and the agents who just want to get them what they are worth. Its not the zoomer kids, its the parents. The club didn't need a discount, just market value.Agreed.
And they’re going to the finals.
You would have thought with Dubas being such a supposedly “nice guy” that perhaps they might have taken a home town discount.
Guess it doesn’t work that way, of at least didn’t here.
Born a moron, you die a moron
It's not just that it's four players, it's that it's THESE four players, guys that often don't raise the bar when it needs to be raised the most, that makes it truly horrid.Whoever came up with the genius idea of spending half your cap on four players is to blame for everything, those who agreed with the idea are just as much to blame………
No doubt!If Dubas goes to Pittsburgh I'm thinking the Penguins start becoming a big topic for The Athletic.
Before Dubas got canned, many on this site along with Siegel and Mirtle made Dubas out to be an incredible and almost un-replaceable GM. Run it back forever, the Leafs are right on the verge of hoisting the cup was their argument.So just another Dubas thread now lol... not so much about the perceived media representation of the facts of the matter anymore.
Stick a knife in it, we have this thread *3
There we go, that's back on topic a bit.Before Dubas got canned, many on this site along with Siegal and Mirtle made Dubas out to be an incredible and almost un-replaceable GM. Run it back forever, the Leafs are right on the verge of hoisting the cup was their argument.
Now their narrative has changed and it’s that Dubas didn’t have success because Shanahan and MLSE ownership meddled.
So which argument is correct?
Dubas is awesome?
Or he sucked, but it’s someone else’s fault?
The truth is probably that he was neither.There we go, that's back on topic a bit.
Only point is we don't need another Dubas good/bad thread, and this one is there today.
Media representation of situation, that's a different thread and hey, have at 'er.
Here, I can't speak to, haven't been around to this level for years. Fun diving back in. Really bad for productivity lol..The truth is probably that he was neither.
He didn’t suck and he wasn’t awesome. He was a average GM that got very average overall results.
Why some here and in the media made him out to be some new age prophet is beyond me. It seems like he represented a particular generation age wise, mixed in with a bit of progressive politics.
Yes, so all those great trades you said he made last week, was it him or was it Shanny interfering and making the great deals? The intellectual pretzels are hilarious. He did such an amazing job, but really it was Shanny. Too funny.Before Dubas got canned, many on this site along with Siegel and Mirtle made Dubas out to be an incredible and almost un-replaceable GM. Run it back forever, the Leafs are right on the verge of hoisting the cup was their argument.
Now their narrative has changed and it’s that Dubas didn’t have success because Shanahan and MLSE ownership meddled.
So which argument is correct?
Dubas is awesome?
Or he sucked, but it’s someone else’s fault?
This is all true but the Panthers core pieces provide significantly more balance, as did the Pens core (Crosby, Malkin, Letang, Fleury) and the Kings (Kopitar, Doughty, Brown, Quick). The Leafs have their money all tied up in 4 soft offensive players. The ironic thing is, with the Leafs core, you'd at least expect exciting 6-4 games in the playoffs but this core just can't come up big in the post season because they have no extra gear.Ehh. Florida is paying nearly as much for Bob, Tkachuk, Barkov, and Ekblad .. and no one seems to be making an issue of that. But that's because Bob and Tkachuk are playing like they're being paid right now in the playoffs.
Had any of the core players have done that in their playoff performances, there would be more success that followed.
Problem is the Leafs hitched their wagon to the wrong core players .. and Dubas' continually gambling on them was his downfall.
what does this even mean? is the Athletic TO shutting down or something? do we expect that these two guys who have covered the Leafs long before Dubas was GM will just now be unable to do so?yeah because they had it easy while probably being overpaid as well lmao. I’d be mourning too if my free cake walk was over.
no doubtIt's seriously weird being a Leafs fan right now.
Could you be any more condescending: "lack of media literacy in modern society?" Media literacy is exact opposite of what you're implying. Media literacy is identifying the biases/agendas, catching the story framing, seeing the out right ignoring of other notable facts and events, recognizing the grandiosity of the individuals in the media, seeing when "the media" goes into full marketing campaign masquerading as news.This thread is a really good example of the lack of media literacy in modern society. OP is basically saying because Mirtle and Siegel have opinions different than he does that they were a part of a secret media cabal to spread pro-Dubas propaganda.
Exactly spend money but get a goalie ffsA goalie, dman, centerman, winger instead of 2 wingers and 2 centres seems a better way to spend $ and to balance a roster.