Goalies are notoriously difficult to draft and develop, trading for a somewhat older underachiever (i.e. Campbell) is the way to go. The Kings grabbed a couple of good ones at the draft in Bernier and Quick, but those were an anomaly.
It's not like Ingham or Villalta are blue-chippers, they are mid and late-rounders. But still, their numbers have to be taken with a grain of salt. The AHL is often a mess systematically so numbers can really suffer. Look at Tarasov in Columbus, or even better Luukkonen in Buffalo. Both guys have looked pretty good in limited time this year, yet their AHL numbers aren't good at all. Personally I could see how Ingham or Villalta don't have much of a future with the Kings anyways. The clock is starting to tick with regards to finding a second to Petersen and there is too much at stake to give them a few games to see how they perform in a more structured system. I'm holding out hope for Villalta but I just don't see him as having "it".
It's not like Ingham or Villalta are blue-chippers, they are mid and late-rounders. But still, their numbers have to be taken with a grain of salt. The AHL is often a mess systematically so numbers can really suffer. Look at Tarasov in Columbus, or even better Luukkonen in Buffalo. Both guys have looked pretty good in limited time this year, yet their AHL numbers aren't good at all. Personally I could see how Ingham or Villalta don't have much of a future with the Kings anyways. The clock is starting to tick with regards to finding a second to Petersen and there is too much at stake to give them a few games to see how they perform in a more structured system. I'm holding out hope for Villalta but I just don't see him as having "it".